It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
After looking into things to see just who these fruitcakes actually were, I discovered this (forgive the source...they get it right sometimes too):
Incorporated in 1967 as a not-for-profit organization, WBC considers itself an “Old School (or Primitive)” Baptist Church. WBC’s leader is Fred Phelps and several of his children and dozens of his grandchildren appear to constitute the majority of the group’s members. WBC has no official affiliation with mainstream Baptist organizations.
Source
Originally posted by Maluhia
reply to post by nenothtu
For some reason your post made me think of Ted Haggard - go figure.
Originally posted by 12voltz
reply to post by intrepid
Fred Phelps jr is loving that attention.I bet he went home and looked at his butt cheeks in the mirror
Whats with some of those signs? "god hates cripple soldiers"!!! "America is doomed".
Can we get some WBC players on here , with some sources and evidence as required
Originally posted by Deaf Alien
I have made a few threads and many posts about the fact that NOWHERE in the bible does it say that homosexuality is wrong. NOWHERE.
I have to take issue with the characterization of WBC as "Primitive Baptists". Their doctrine is nothing like the doctrine of Primitive Baptists. Primitive Baptists are for the most part stand-offish and isolationist, and would not be caught dead at a protest rally, and their doctrine specifically prohibits litigation, which absoultely cannot be said of WBC's money-making scams.
It does. It's one passage in Deuteronomy or Leviticus (can't remember which). It says that Homosexuality is an Abomination. The Old Testament also says that Shellfish are an Abomination so I guess I'm going to hell for every time I've eaten at Red Lobster. And it also says you can have 2 slaves. Make sure you get yours today!
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
Thank you for the reply and clarification. I really wasn't entirely clear on the 'Primitive' reference. My focus in sharing what I did was in the family nature of the WBC as opposed to a regular Church as the Media would have folks believe this is. However, your explanation of what that reference actually means adds to my understanding of this and I appreciate it.
That's because all those "anti-establishment folks" way back when ARE the establishment now. What's left to fight when you become what you were fighting?
Originally posted by dron020
This is why I love Rock Music. Sadly popular music today is pro establishment
Check the knee-jerk reaction at the door, for a moment while I play Devil's Advocate. What if there really are consequences to your choices in life? (Notice I stayed away from the gay thing. There are far more decisions out there than whom we sleep with.) The thing is that good, bad, or parallel, most things we do have consequences (not always a bad consequence, either), but a group like this makes it far easier to go against them rather than see if any of their claims have merit.
Originally posted by Floydshayvious WBC can tell me that I and my significant other are going to burn for an eternity, but giving them the power of attention is giving them ammunition - and that makes me just as dense.
Sounds like you're talking Church of Christ to me. I grew up that and still am nominally labeled that. Sadly our roots were in the Reformation Movement, which was the most modern thinking of the "Protestant movements". Our "forefathers" would revolt against much of what we now are.
Originally posted by nenothtuPrimitive Baptists are for the most part stand-offish and isolationist, and would not be caught dead at a protest rally, and their doctrine specifically prohibits litigation, which absoultely cannot be said of WBC's money-making scams.
Primitive Baptists are so "conservative" in their doctrine that they don't even allow music in church services - everything is sung acapella, and all the song's I've heard in their services seem to carry the exact same "tune", regardless of which song it is. Their preachers tend to preach in a nearly incomprehensible sing-song chant that gets worse as it progresses, reminiscent of an auctioneer getting "wound up", and it used to scare the hell outta me when I was a kid.
Nah, it goes even further. The land is trying to vomit them out (a scriptural reference in Leviticus). But then the land tries to revolt against human sacrifice as well. I wince with this one because I can't deny that it's there, and it tends to end debate and make everything into a "you backwards Christian!" moment. It's never been about the particular sin, it's always about rebellion.
Originally posted by CryHavoc
It does. It's one passage in Deuteronomy or Leviticus (can't remember which). It says that Homosexuality is an Abomination.
I disagree with # 4, only because the "individuality" is only viable when to follow God, you MUST march in lock-step, and only the really conservative (I mean even beyond me) have such a rigid Pharisaical outlook.There is a lot of room for individuality without resorting to sin, written into the book. From the Pauline position that everyone likes to throw out for being soooooooooo rigid.
Originally posted by Sphota
reply to post by CynicalDrivel
True, but there's also:
1. Hate the sin, not the sinner.
2. Nobody's perfect.
3. He without sin cast the first stone.
And my favorite...
4. There's a certain spirit of individuality in sin, that gives you your character when it's not to excess.
The reason sexual sins are blown out of proportion is that certain sexual sins are listed, Biblically, in lists like the Abomination lists (but then, so is being divisive liar--look at the original 7 deadly sins for that :lol and that Sexual Sins are the only sins listed as being sins against yourself as well as the other person. But at the same time, 1 sin, the tiniest white lie, the theft of a single penny is as wrong (contextually--takes a lot of explanation, and I really think this is for another thread) as being the next Ted Bundy, as far as how it separates you from God.
The idea that somehow homosexuality, assuming it is a sin in God's eyes, is beyond par with any other sin (ie, it's exceptional and stands to the forefront of the most heinous of sins such as killing or raping or stealing) is a major stretch. At the very least, the only sin regarding sexuality from my point of view is sexual abuse, sexual violence and to a more inwardly focused angle, sexual addiction.
I absolutely agree that this deserves another thread.
Originally posted by Maluhia
reply to post by CryHavoc
It does. It's one passage in Deuteronomy or Leviticus (can't remember which). It says that Homosexuality is an Abomination. The Old Testament also says that Shellfish are an Abomination so I guess I'm going to hell for every time I've eaten at Red Lobster. And it also says you can have 2 slaves. Make sure you get yours today!
This info (and many other examples like it) deserves a thread of its own. Just make sure you wear all your sparring gear if you go for it.
Besides that, I don't see why you ASSUMED If I went down there that violence would insue...
I wasn't arguing about whether abortion was right, wrong, or fuzzy green nurples. My WHOLE AND OLNY point was that the groups have different agendas and mindsets. So, if you had started arguing about the right and wrong of Abortion, I'd have had to back you off.
Originally posted by NerdGoddess
Im not going to argue the abortion thing, Because If I do, my whole post will be off topic.
My comment, had nothing to do with YOUR intent. These people are looking for excuses to financially own businesses and people through the court system. I was giving you a bad scenario, and someone else with bad intent causes you to be put in a position of assumed violence. BIG difference.
Besides that, I don't see why you ASSUMED If I went down there that violence would insue....
Peaceful usually isn't an in-your-face thing. If you catch too much attitude about it, people will assume your next step is violent. The underhanded will occasionally make sure you get the blame when things go wrong. All I'd request of you is restraint in order to be the better person. If you were planning on going to meet them and use restraint while giving them a piece of your mind, then I applaud you.
I have the right to peaceful protests as do they, so If I went down there I would counter protest.
Read my response again, and see why I'm trying NOT to to taunt you for this statement.
Assuming things is bad for all of us.