It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Dust from the tons of drywall and sheetrock and fireproofing.
Originally posted by Varemia
Why would there be space between the first falling floor and not the subsequent floors below?
Originally posted by Bob Sholtz
reply to post by Varemia
so you're model of the twin towers is floors floating on nothing? you do realize there were verticle support columns, right? and that all the floors were connected by walls. you know, exactly how the cement blocks are.
and he put space between the falling block and the colliding block erring widely on the side of the OS. with the twin towers, the collapse wouldn't have even started at 9.8 meters per second^2 because of the matter in those floors. he went ahead and gave it the full 9.8.
the floors are represented by the flat top, middle, and bottom of the cinder blocks, so there is space between them, as they are held up by the walls.
Yes, he did it completely wrong and wasted a lot of time. Why would there be space between the first falling floor and not the subsequent floors below? There has to be a system in which there is the same space between each block, and the floor as well.
Originally posted by Varemia
reply to post by ANOK
As I said above, it is not symmetrical. This destroys your argument, simple as that.
Originally posted by Bob Sholtz
seems someone has already done this block drop test, using all manner of things, even small half-blocks. results the same every time.
care to tell me why the wtc towers behaved different?
Originally posted by Bob Sholtz
reply to post by GenRadek
Dust from the tons of drywall and sheetrock and fireproofing.
i've seen samples that show around 25% of the dust was concrete. it was over three inches thick 6 blocks away. that is a huge amount of matter.
Originally posted by Bob Sholtz
reply to post by Varemia
so you're model of the twin towers is floors floating on nothing? you do realize there were verticle support columns, right? and that all the floors were connected by walls. you know, exactly how the cement blocks are.
Originally posted by waypastvne
The towers failed under shear loads.
All of the experiments in this video are set up to fail under compression load. Therefore the man who made this video is an idiot.
If you want to tell me the towers failed under compression.
Originally posted by ANOK
supposedly sheared
Originally posted by Bob Sholtz
[. also, near freefall speed is seen.
Originally posted by Bob Sholtz
this collapse model that the french use for demolitions only works when 50% of the building is dropped on the other 50% AND the lower half is weakened.