NASA Whistleblower: Alien Moon Cities Exist

Why is it that all photos claiming to show evidence of UFO's or Lunar anomalies look blurry and out of focus or pixilated and dark? Just once i'd like to see some evidence that was clear as day!

reply to post by Beowolfs


you, me and a few million others would like to see the 'in your face' photos for sure. maybe an internet petition is in order.
f

Originally posted by Beowolfs
Why is it that all photos claiming to show evidence of UFO's or Lunar anomalies look blurry and out of focus or pixilated and dark? Just once i'd like to see some evidence that was clear as day!

I agree, of course, but there's a pattern (maybe there's a name for this?) where, if supposed evidence is unclear (Bigfoot photos, Loch Ness Monster, many UFO and alien photos), people doubt it for that reason. And if it's clear (the face on Mars, Billy Meier's photos) - regardless of what you think of those specific examples, people doubt them out of hand because they look "too good". You can't win.

reply to post by purplemer


People who are screaming "FAKE" should get their facts right, here are some photo's i studied, i got these directly from NASA/JPL's website, they are acknoweledged to be the original pictures.
Bear that in mind, after a few minutes, i took these closeups from the Apollo 17 mission, i believe these pictures to be from the infamous Shorty Crater.....

Junk?

Robot shoulder

Another head probably an older model?

Discs

Yet more junk...it looks like Mos Isely spaceport out there
Seriously, these are real images, if they were faked, then they were faked by NASA (Not Another Strange Anomaly).

This supposed artificial structure



is part of Apollo 16


.

Poor research.

Originally posted by Bigfoot73
I'm familiar with some of those photos, they've been known about for some time. The first one, the cylinder with the gear teeth is in AS16-116-18603. The 'skull' is in AS17-137-20993/4/5, images which contain many other artifacts.
The digging blade was easily visible in Clementine Lunar Image Browser 1.5, at Lat. -35. Long. 208. NASA 'retired CLIB early last year without explanation.
My personal penny'sworth is that those are the products of a previous advanced human civilization.

Previous advanced human civilization? From Earth or from other planets? Are you talking about Annunaki?

Are there any more credible links to this "story" other than beforeitsnews as that is hardly a very believable source. Anything from that site should be taken with a pinch of salt!

My hunch says these are left overs from previous human endeavors on the Moon.

Aliens aren't likely to leave tools behind

reply to post by blackrain17


I think he means humanoid

reply to post by purplemer


Wouldn't we be the aliens on another planet?

reply to post by purplemer

NASA Whistleblower: Alien Moon Cities Exist

I've been pouring over lunar images and reading the varied reports for years. I am indeed convinced that 'something' about our moon is not quite as we are told. But I also understand that the best way to destroy a subject is to reduce it, or dilute it with disinformation... such as we have seen done on the subject of UFOs for decades.

You do have to be careful what you believe. You can talk about anything... discuss, debate, argue your face blue as ice. But what you believe should be a lot more carefully considered.

I'm not trying to preach, by the way. I'm just sharing my approach to the matter.

I do believe the moon is something wayyyy different than anything we have been led to believe it is. But I am also wayyyy careful about what I spend that belief money on.

Great post!

An equivalent of google earth would be nice. with same zoom options. We get decent shots with Google earth why not google moon.

Originally posted by Engafan
An equivalent of google earth would be nice. with same zoom options. We get decent shots with Google earth why not google moon.

Well if NASA could get the Google Earth car there....

reply to post by DJM8507



I saw that movie too. Moontrap, starring Walter Koenig and Bruce Campbell.

Pretty good B-movie, actually.

hey guys i see here that there are testimonies, photos, and flat out in your face evidence of attempted cover-up but im going to need a second, third and maybe fifth opinion from credible people who i will question anyways. im also going to need some links to reputable websites that discuss this subject, surely a site with this topic will remain credible and reputable in the eyes of the mass. finally, i want my own flying saucer with a invisible cup holder, i also want the pink slip to said saucer with my name as the title older or it does not exist.

Interesting link(s) on that site, in particular about that experiment which did indicate life on Mars. I really didn't know that.

Just merely a thought that popped into my head as I was reading through this. It is claimed that there is evidence to support that the moon landings were faked, just as there is evidence to support that we really went there. What if technically both are true. Let's just say we went to moon, found artifacts and evidence of another civilization. To cover it up, they had to "re-create" the moon landings on a sound stage or wherever. I would think that in this era before photoshop and video editing software, most of this stuff would be difficult to edit out without being able to tell that something was removed or changed. Just a thought, I have nothing to support either, thought I'd share and see what the plausibility of this scenario could be.

Originally posted by 2manyquestions
Those pictures are too pixelated to be able to determine whether or not they are legitimate. Until they finally come out and just say it, it's going to be hard to figure it all out without either seeing clear evidence, or traveling to the moon to see it for one self.

This could be nothing at all, but I tend to take a few moon pictures with my camera, and I noticed something interesting when studying them closely. There was a crater in the shadow zone that seemed brighter than it should have been. The moon is supposed to reflect sunlight, which is what makes it shine at night, but this crater is obviously in a shadowy area where sunlight would be very limited. Why then does it seem so bright compared to other craters around it? Even when the moon is full, that particular crater still seems to outshine all the rest. I'll be honest, I don't know that much about moon geography. Maybe it's a non-issue. Anyone have an explanation?

View at full size. The crater is located almost directly in the middle of the left side of the moon.

My moon shot

Here's a shot where the left side is not in the shadow, and notice the crater is brighter than the rest.

My moon shot 2

edit on 15-9-2011 by 2manyquestions because: To add photo

Probably been answered already but the bright object is Aristarchus - the-moon.wikispaces.com...

Newer craters tend to be brighter in appearance as the ejection of dust is fresher than the surrounding area.

As for the topic in hand I don't think it's beyond the realms of possibility that the moon was used for a base, either by terrestrial or extra-terrestrial - look how far we've come technologically in only a century.

interesting....

Originally posted by Dayvancowboy
maybe they're not advanced ancient cities. maybe its where the super elite are gonna go when the shtf here on earth. thats why we imposed a no fly zone around the moon. DUN DUN DUUUUN!!

This is what I am thinking too. Saying they are ancient cities...is a coverup. I bet that the former Nasa employee...got paid a lot of money (under the table)....to spread this information.....he is a well planned plant....to spread lies and cover up the real truth....which is....there are actual cities that have been built...and are now nearly ready to inhabit...one of..the reasons for the coverup and the no-fly zone.