It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Six6Six
Originally posted by gaurdian2012
AGENT Six6Six YOU WROTE
My thread clearly state that evidence is not the topic.
I asked for people to explain why the two "truthers" are still walking around?
Originally posted by Six6Six
I
Well the burrden of proof must be on those who do not believe the GOVERNMENTS story, people who AMERICANS voted in freely.
I do not carry the burden as I have not given much thought to 9/11 in the first place.
I am though sick of people not having evidence for their claims.
Since both towers collapsed, little physical evidence was available to guide the investigation.
Primary sources of information for estimating initial conditions, guiding, and validating the results of the models were analyses of structural steel, review and analysis of available imagery of the event, and eyewitness accounts.
Originally posted by 5MaveN5
Originally posted by Six6Six
I
Well the burrden of proof must be on those who do not believe the GOVERNMENTS story, people who AMERICANS voted in freely.
I do not carry the burden as I have not given much thought to 9/11 in the first place.
Huh?? What?? Geez, now I feel dumberer for having posted here..
I am though sick of people not having evidence for their claims.
Such as yourself? ???
This is a great line boy!
But in all seriousness, your youtube videos are not really proof are they?
I have NOT heard the truth yet.
I would clearly like to hear some real evidence.
But alas, no evidence beside one sided home grown science can be offered.
Originally posted by Six6Six
Originally posted by 5MaveN5
Originally posted by Six6Six
I
Well the burrden of proof must be on those who do not believe the GOVERNMENTS story, people who AMERICANS voted in freely.
I do not carry the burden as I have not given much thought to 9/11 in the first place.
Huh?? What?? Geez, now I feel dumberer for having posted here..
I am though sick of people not having evidence for their claims.
Such as yourself? ???
I need no proof for my Thread to be relevant. If you read it carefully you will see that i mention nothing about evidence or proof but ask question about the freely walking two jackels that are avery and jones.
Oh and maybe irony is in effect but there is no such word as "dumberer" in the context you used. So that statement may have some legitimate backing!edit on 15-9-2011 by Six6Six because: (no reason given)
Another post with ZERO evidence of any factual form.
How many people come on ATS with little or no grammatical capabilities?
I am fed up with reading post that sound like my 3 year old wrote them!
edit on 15-9-2011 by auraelium because: (no reason given)
A VIDEO IS NOT EVIDENCE.
Originally posted by ErtaiNaGia
reply to post by Six6Six
A VIDEO IS NOT EVIDENCE.
THEN WHY DO YOU BELIEVE
IN THE OFFICIAL STORY?[/SIZE]
I do appreciate it but you have derailed the threads actual point
Again with the government employment? what is that about?
Originally posted by Six6Six
Originally posted by ErtaiNaGia
reply to post by Six6Six
A VIDEO IS NOT EVIDENCE.
THEN WHY DO YOU BELIEVE
IN THE OFFICIAL STORY?[/SIZE]
Where in MY OP did I say I believe the OS 100% I just said I did not believe the truthers story and that it may be fake because of one simple point!
I am concerned that a government that supposedly KILLED 3000 can not kill two jokers? It make them look weak, UNLESS they did not commit 9/11 in the first place.edit on 15-9-2011 by Six6Six because: (no reason given)
Where in MY OP did I say I believe the OS 100% I just said I did not believe the truthers story and that it may be fake because of one simple point!
I am concerned that a government that supposedly KILLED 3000 can not kill two jokers? It make them look weak, UNLESS they did not commit 9/11 in the first place.
We are too believe that the US can KILL 3000 people in full view of the world but taking out a mouthy, uneducated kid by either hit and run, car jacking, drive by shooting or poison or any number of ways is a step too far? That they would rather have LOOSE CHANGE circling the net and the world causing some easily brainwashed people to ask dodgy questions and shed bad light on their MASTER PLAN???????
I don't think so. I think they would of killed him with no hesitation IF they really did commit the terrorist attack themselves.
Also, why is Steven Jones still walking about free to spout his fictional accounts of his poorly executed science experiments that have convinced truthers the US government committed this atrocious attack.
That simple reasoning is this is all the proof we need to know that the US government were not the ones who took down the twin towers. Its that simple.
Is it only me who sees the utter stupidity in that single statement?
Man I type this more and more often lately....
No the OS states Bin alnden and his men committed the crimes.
I do not believe that part.
I do NOT know who did. That would be interesting to find out. But I do not think it is those two groups mentioned above.
Originally posted by Six6Six
reply to post by ErtaiNaGia
Again with the government employment? what is that about?
Look boy, my thread was not about truthers evidence or OS evidence. It was about the scenario but that has passed you by as you are remaining blinkered to your truthers pact.
I did not watch the two hour video as there is no point. I can easily add many youtube videos that point foul at the truthers but that is not my threads intention.
You and your other thread on the OS being a conspiracy are so cult like in wording and presentation.
A VIDEO IS NOT EVIDENCE. ITS WHY SO MANY UFO PHOTOS AND VIDEOS ARE NOT TAKEN SERIOUSLY BECAUSE THEY ARE SUSPECT AND SHOT FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF THE MAKER ONLY.
If you dont like this thread may I suggest you leave. Find something more to your level of interest. You are clearly here to try and cause an argument but that is easy for someone who is hiding behind a screen.
So lets no argue and lets just agree that you are not wholly correct. Thanks you for your time boy, I do appreciate it but you have derailed the threads actual point (which is not about evidence, that you do not have)edit on 15-9-2011 by Six6Six because: (no reason given)