It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by WarminIndy
reply to post by truthrising2012
Controlled explosions start at the bottom, that is the method. There is not one video or eyewitness who says there was an explosion at the the bottom of any building at the WTC. We did see explosions (from the jets) at 100 plus floors above the bottom.
That is certainly suspect in saying if it were a controlled explosion or not. Since the explosion occurred where the plane hit, that would mean a plane did hit it.
All controlled explosions start at the bottom. Did you see an explosion at the bottom of the WTC?
Originally posted by truthrising2012
Originally posted by WarminIndy
reply to post by truthrising2012
Controlled explosions start at the bottom, that is the method. There is not one video or eyewitness who says there was an explosion at the the bottom of any building at the WTC. We did see explosions (from the jets) at 100 plus floors above the bottom.
That is certainly suspect in saying if it were a controlled explosion or not. Since the explosion occurred where the plane hit, that would mean a plane did hit it.
All controlled explosions start at the bottom. Did you see an explosion at the bottom of the WTC?
Me personally? No I wasn't at the location when it occurred. I also don't recall anyone at the base or basement of the WTC ever hearing any explosions, only the people on the exact floor of where the plane hit is where they heard the explosion of the impact of the plane hitting the building.
Underwriters
Laboratories performed four tests which incorporated six variables:
1. Truss span: 17 ft or 35 ft
2. SFRM thickness: 3/4 inch or 1/2 inch
3. Restrained (unable to flex with expansion) or unrestrained
All four tests incorporated the full design load. In an effort to keep the results scaled for the
shorter lengths, the load assigned to them was doubled.
What they found was that
“All four test specimens sustained the maximum design load for approximately 2 hours
without collapsing.” (NCSTAR 1, 143)
In the opening pages, NIST confirms that
“…in all cases, the floors continued to support the full design load without collapse for
over 2 hours.” (NCSTAR 1, xli)
Originally posted by plube
I have read it and it does not back up one thing of what you said...it is saying after the collapse and looking at the seats they were bent down.....
.
Originally posted by plube
the performance test actually go against what they are saying....Also NIST could not even get access to the area...or most of the materials that would be necessary to come to reasonable conclusions.
But keep on believing what you are being told,,,,,,
As you see even NISTS own testing did not support what wayne posted...
The 2nd law does not contradict the 3rd law, they all work together. The 2nd law explain the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration. You have to consider the 3rd law in context. The 3rd law states that when two objects collide the forces on both objects is EQUAL, which is why 15 floors can not crush 95 floors. An increase of mass, or velocity, of one object increases the forces felt by BOTH objects, again equally.
The fact that you are confused over this is why you can't see a problem with the NIST explanation of the collapses. I know it's hard to get your head around, and just reading about it on line might not help you understand what you're reading.
Do they not teach this stuff in high school any more?
Shear strength in engineering is a term used to describe the strength of a material or component against the type of yield or structural failure where the material or component fails in shear. A shear load is a force that tends to produce a sliding failure on a material along a plane that is parallel to the direction of the force. When a paper is cut with scissors, the paper fails in shear.
In structural and mechanical engineering the shear strength of a component is important for designing the dimensions and materials to be used for the manufacture/construction of the component (e.g. beams, plates, or bolts) In a reinforced concrete beam, the main purpose of stirrups is to increase the shear strength..
A design specification provides explicit information about the requirements for a product and how the product is to be put together. It is the most traditional kind of specification, having been used historically in public contracting for buildings, highways, and other public works, and represents the kind of thinking in which architects and engineers have been trained. Its use is called for where a structure or product has to be specially made to meet a unique need. For example, a design specification must include all necessary drawings, dimensions, terms, and definitions of non-standard terms, and the materials used must be described fully to include thickness, size, color, etc.
Originally posted by WarminIndy
reply to post by Ewok_Boba
So a computer burning in one room can cause damage? That much you admit? And the video I posted was silly and I posted it for a reason. It is people like you who demand credibility while yet denying the credible accounts of the victims and witnesses.
Do you even know where the origins of the lies came from?
Here is one link www.slate.com...
We can post videos all day long, but at the end of the day, airplanes were hijacked, thousands were killed and the Twin Towers fell. Why is it so hard to give any honor and remembrance to those who died?
Originally posted by plube
Well you my friend are out of date as NIST throughout the pancake theory with the wash approximately 3yrs ago....so you might want to look that up....
Conservation of Momentum
The momentum of an isolated system is a constant. The vector sum of the momenta mv of all the objects of a system cannot be changed by interactions within the system. This puts a strong constraint on the types of motions which can occur in an isolated system. If one part of the system is given a momentum in a given direction, then some other part or parts of the system must simultaneously be given exactly the same momentum in the opposite direction. As far as we can tell, conservation of momentum is an absolute symmetry of nature. That is, we do not know of anything in nature that violates it.
Conservation of Angular Momentum
The angular momentum of an isolated system remains constant in both magnitude and direction. The angular momentum is defined as the product of the moment of inertia I and the angular velocity. The angular momentum is a vector quantity and the vector sum of the angular momenta of the parts of an isolated system is constant. This puts a strong constraint on the types of rotational motions which can occur in an isolated system. If one part of the system is given an angular momentum in a given direction, then some other part or parts of the system must simultaneously be given exactly the same angular momentum in the opposite direction. As far as we can tell, conservation of angular momentum is an absolute symmetry of nature. That is, we do not know of anything in nature that violates it.
Disappearing Angular Momentum
The deceleration of the top's rotation is even more discrediting to the idea of a gravity-driven collapse, which cannot explain the documented changes in angular momentum. Conservation of angular momentum is the tendency of a rotating solid object to continue rotating at the same rate in the absence of torque. Initially the block consisting of the top 30 stories of the tower acted as a solid object, and rotated about a fulcrum near the impact zone. Although the fulcrum was the axis of rotation, the block had two types of momentum: the angular momentum of the block around its center of gravity, and the linear momentum of its center of gravity tilting away from the tower's vertical axis. When the portion of the building below the collapse zone disintegrated, the block would preserve its angular momentum by continuing to rotate at the same rate (but the acceleration of the rotation would cease due to the removal of the torque that was being applied by intact columns at the fulcrum). But in reality, the rotation of the block rapidly decelerated as the downward plunge began. Once the fall started, any resistance it encountered from parts of the building would have imparted torque on the block in the same direction as the original fulcrum, and would have accelerated its rotation.
Given the apparent absence of any torque to counter the rotation of the block, the slowing of its rotation can only be explained by the breakup of most of the block, which would have destroyed its moment of inertia.
Originally posted by plube
don't even need to acknowledge that one mate
i know my background...and i have a fairly decent understanding of what did not occur on the day....
so when the time comes i hope you enjoy your stay in the Fema camps.....Because i wont be there with you.
NIST’s findings do not support the “pancake theory” of collapse, which is premised on a progressive failure of the floor systems in the WTC towers (the composite floor system—that connected the core columns and the perimeter columns—consisted of a grid of steel “trusses” integrated with a concrete slab). Instead, the NIST investigation showed conclusively that the failure of the inwardly bowed perimeter columns initiated collapse and that the occurrence of this inward bowing required the sagging floors to remain connected to the columns and pull the columns inwards. Thus, the floors did not fail progressively to cause a pancaking phenomenon.
sorry mate your whole thing failed.....and you can go on and on...but it does matter big time and the energy is transferred and...
yes soon as the upper block hit that special floor your talking about...engery is transferred in the fracturing of the seats and dampers..
The floors were connected to the perimeter spandrel plates with viscoelastic dampers that helped reduce the amount of sway felt by building occupants.
en.wikipedia.org...
During the design process, wind tunnel tests were done to establish design wind pressures that the World Trade Center towers could be subjected to and structural response to those forces.[36] Experiments also were done to evaluate how much sway occupants could comfortably tolerate, however, many subjects experienced dizziness and other ill effects.[37] One of the chief engineers Leslie Robertson worked with Canadian engineer Alan G. Davenport to develop viscoelastic dampers to absorb some of the sway. These viscoelastic dampers, used throughout the structures at the joints between floor trusses and perimeter columns along with some other structural modifications, reduced the building sway to an acceptable level
also you have a massive central core which in your repsonse you have not taken into accound at all....where it is actually resisting the falling upper block..
The core of the towers housed the elevator and utility shafts, restrooms, three stairwells, and other support spaces. The core of each tower was a rectangular area 87 by 135 feet (27 by 41 m) and contained 47 steel columns running from the bedrock to the top of the tower. The large, column-free space between the perimeter and core was bridged by prefabricated floor trusses. The floors supported their own weight as well as live loads, providing lateral stability to the exterior walls and distributing wind loads among the exterior walls.[32] The floors consisted of 4 inches (10 cm) thick lightweight concrete slabs laid on a fluted steel deck. A grid of lightweight bridging trusses and main trusses supported the floors.[33] The trusses connected to the perimeter at alternate columns and were on 6 foot 8 inch (2.03 m) centers. The top chords of the trusses were bolted to seats welded to the spandrels on the exterior side and a channel welded to the core columns on the interior side. The floors were connected to the perimeter spandrel plates with viscoelastic dampers that helped reduce the amount of sway felt by building occupants.
The World Trade Center towers used high-strength, load-bearing perimeter steel columns called Vierendeel trusses that were spaced closely together to form a strong, rigid wall structure, supporting virtually all lateral loads such as wind loads, and sharing the gravity load with the core columns. The perimeter structure containing 59 columns per side was constructed with extensive use of prefabricated modular pieces each consisting of three columns, three stories tall, connected by spandrel plates.
.
Also unique to the engineering design were its core and elevator system. The twin towers were the first supertall buildings designed without any masonry. Worried that the intense air pressure created by the buildingsâ high speed elevators might buckle conventional shafts, engineers designed a solution using a drywall system fixed to the reinforced steel core
Originally posted by Cilvanus
How would you, the original poster and the like, melt steel which is rated for 2600-2800 degrees when the fire temperatures alleged in the official story were only 1300 degrees?
Considering the official story claims that both planes damaged the exterior as well as the inner columns, why did the top of the building not do the same?
wouldn't it be simpler for the outer edge of the tower to collapse first on the side where they were damaged and instead of through the path of greatest resistance?
it would require 10 times the kinetic energy which the buildings fell with to turn the concrete to hot ash which is what happened,
Unless you can offer an alternative to the clouds being pulverized concrete, i feel you have not researched your topic and are as prepared for debate as you could be
How would one explain the chemical tracers for military grade thermite and actual solid pieces of thermite being found in the dust and ash?
And lastly, another one of my favorite questions; how does a falling building melt steel into pools which so many claim to have been at the bottom of rubble, and in the basement.
Fire fighters claimed it was like a foundry in the basement with pools of molten steel before the building even collapsed?
If you feel that the firefighters were just lying
A building designed to specifically handle the weight and impact of a 707 ainplane
defied both physics and thermodynamics
Originally posted by plube
your doing the same thing still....making snarky little remarks...
NIST’s findings do not support the “pancake theory” of collapse, which is premised on a progressive failure of the floor systems in the WTC towers (the composite floor system—that connected the core columns and the perimeter columns—consisted of a grid of steel “trusses” integrated with a concrete slab). Instead, the NIST investigation showed conclusively that the failure of the inwardly bowed perimeter columnsinitiated collapse and that the occurrence of this inward bowing required the sagging floors to remain connected to the columns and pull the columns inwards. Thus, the floors did not fail progressively to cause a pancaking phenomenon.
this is a reply to questions ask by A&E from NIST.......but hey...will you bother to read...nope.
and also the upper block would not just collapse symetrically upon itself in one go in the same way with two different impacts....which would have affected each building differently.
LAW III: To every action there is always opposed an equal reaction: or the mutual actions of two bodies upon each other are always equal, and directed to contrary parts. — Whatever draws or presses another is as much drawn or pressed by that other.
now to say that the physics don't apply because why...IT' S construction....now that is just unbelievable
You are wrong about Newton's Laws. They completely explain how the upper mass while accelerating and picking up momentem can subject the construction materials well pass their design specifications.
let me ask you this.....say the plane exerted 20000N of force upon the tower...how much did the tower exert on the plane.
also the seats were connected to the spandrels of the perimeters wllas and they were connected to the I-Beams of the core.
now as you can see in this law...and read the end.....we do not know of anything in nature that violates it....the momentum from the upper block will tranfers that potential energy into the lower block...but that engery will soon enough run down.
The spandrel plates were located at each floor, transmitting shear stress between columns, allowing them to work together in resisting lateral loads.
The floors were connected to the perimeter spandrel plates with viscoelastic dampers that helped reduce the amount of sway felt by building occupants.
Structural building engineering is primarily driven by the creative manipulation of materials and forms and the underlying mathematical and scientific ideas to achieve an end which fulfills its functional requirements and is structurally safe when subjected to all the loads it could reasonably be expected to experience.