It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Komodo
reply to post by The Old American
Change your ways and ways of thinking or change your christian status; you can't have both better yet.. read the bible from cover to cover.................
Sorry about the spelling, since english is my second language i think i do very good. It does not hurt me at all, it is not moral for marriage, atheist, Marxist, liberal garbage. The gay agenda goes deeper than marriage, if you dont think so you are blind.
Originally posted by The Old American
...
I am quite OK with gay married couples adopting. Since being gay is overwhelmingly found to occur in nature, and thus could be said to be genetic, it's unlikely a child will "grow up to be gay".
...
Originally posted by The Old American
Originally posted by Komodo
reply to post by The Old American
Change your ways and ways of thinking or change your christian status; you can't have both better yet.. read the bible from cover to cover.................
Thank you for your comments. I have read it from cover to cover, not to mention I've researched it. I would advise the same to you.
/TOA
I agree for the most part, if god will judge the gays only he knows? My point of this writing is to tell of the Marxist people behind the gay agenda, these types of issues are gateways to other insanity, man and women in marriage has been the way of the world for a long time now all of a sudden its going to change and make things better? BS
Originally posted by Domo1
reply to post by discharged77
Sorry about the spelling, since english is my second language i think i do very good. It does not hurt me at all, it is not moral for marriage, atheist, Marxist, liberal garbage. The gay agenda goes deeper than marriage, if you dont think so you are blind.
You were actually doing so good I wouldn't have realized English was a second language for you! Sorry for that, it's very annoying and petty to correct people's spelling (especially considering how bad I am sometimes).
If it does not hurt you, then why is it morally wrong? More specifically, why should you care if someone does a certain thing if it does not hurt you or others? I have a general dislike for vegetarians, but as they are not hurting anyone think they should be free to do as they wish. Let God judge.
Originally posted by CodyOutlaw
I really, really, really get uncomfortable when laws are debated in a religious context.
The fact of the matter is that a marriage contract between two consenting adults should be available to all who seek it. It's definitely not something to be decided upon in the arena of religious thinking.
People need to mind their own damn business more often.
gay marrige was legal in rome
Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to post by spw184
gay marrige was legal in rome
Rome fell.
So did Sodom and Gomorrah.
Like I said, I don't think the government has any logical reason to be involved in this matter in today's world, but I can say that countries without strong family foundations typically don't last long. Can a gay couple create a strong family foundation? I think they can. But will they? That is the question. Not that straight couples are any saner.
Originally posted by Gravity215
Originally posted by The Old American
...
I am quite OK with gay married couples adopting. Since being gay is overwhelmingly found to occur in nature, and thus could be said to be genetic, it's unlikely a child will "grow up to be gay".
...
Hi OP,
A little off topic but I would have to disagree with this statement. Evolution clearly points to homosexuality as a disease. Before politics got involved it was classified as this and only changed by political pressure.
Originally posted by The Old American
Originally posted by Gravity215
Originally posted by The Old American
...
I am quite OK with gay married couples adopting. Since being gay is overwhelmingly found to occur in nature, and thus could be said to be genetic, it's unlikely a child will "grow up to be gay".
...
Hi OP,
A little off topic but I would have to disagree with this statement. Evolution clearly points to homosexuality as a disease. Before politics got involved it was classified as this and only changed by political pressure.
If it is a disease, then why would God forbid the act to his early human children? Surely God knows that if a person is afflicted with a disease that person is not in full control of their actions.
Yes you are right, the gay agenda is a part of the liberal Marxist arm of this country.
Originally posted by Gravity215
Originally posted by The Old American
Originally posted by Gravity215
Originally posted by The Old American
...
I am quite OK with gay married couples adopting. Since being gay is overwhelmingly found to occur in nature, and thus could be said to be genetic, it's unlikely a child will "grow up to be gay".
...
Hi OP,
A little off topic but I would have to disagree with this statement. Evolution clearly points to homosexuality as a disease. Before politics got involved it was classified as this and only changed by political pressure.
If it is a disease, then why would God forbid the act to his early human children? Surely God knows that if a person is afflicted with a disease that person is not in full control of their actions.
Im not disrespecting you my friend, simply correcting a statement you made regarding the status of homosexuality. Its not just the religious who disagree with some of the stories floating around about human sexuality, its also science.
The whole thing was used by TPTB as a way to create more division by taking over gay rights movements in order to create resentment for them in the general public. Giving the line line to the most flaming activists making ridiculous claims for things that most homosexuals wouldn't care about in a lifetime. Once legal equality is attained as it is in many area's, the rest is just politics and division for control.