It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Masonic President Franklin Roosevelt, aided by his Secretary of Agriculture/Vice President Wallace, ordered these Seals to be placed on the back of the Dollar Bill in 1935, having been urged on and advised by the Russian channeler/mystic, Nicolas Roerach.
Originally posted by DaveNorris
i know, how can we be soo stupid to beleive in beings that come from other planets, it makes sooo much more sence that they come from a mystical fairy world that we cannot observe in any way at all
1. They don't believe in a resurrection. 2. Someone who has died but yet remains alive is a "zombie" by our modern culture. Forget that real zombies are severely drugged living people. 3. Cannibalistic behavior is a trait of zombification. Catholics and others insisting that bread as body and wine as blood instead of metaphor are "insisting on cannibalism". 4. It's far more fun to go with it. Egged my husband to mess with his Atheist buddy and run up too him glass eyed, growling "Braaaaaaaaaaaaaaainssssssssssssssalvaaaation!" That shut him up more than any other arguement out there. Which proves that it's not if you are right, or even argue logically, but that people are mollified by disarming humor than they are by proof.
Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
How can Jesus be a zombie if he's alive?
They question the Authority of the Bible to learn anything from. The only time to use this phrasing with those who SEVERELY don't believe is when they WANT a Biblical discussion. Like if they say the phrase, "The Bible says this, and yet this happens!" or something like that. You have to place your words in a different manner. Most, if not all, of my Bible referencing in here (when I bother), has either been to people who have started with the use of the Bible, or when they start saying "Christians believe xyz!" Sorry, if all Christians can pick up their Bible and read it, then Bible can be used to argue a point on what Christians believe, some Christians believe, what they ought to believe, et. al.
Bible clearly states his body physically ascended.
The body of evidence for this and how reasonable it is requires a whole thread. Asserting this doesn't phase them. In fact, the assertion automatically biases them against what follows, even when you are right.
Christianity is based on historical facts. It is impossible to separate the Christ of faith from the historical Jesus. He is one and the same. The Christ of faith is the Jesus of history. He lived a perfect life on this earth in Jerusalem and was crucified on a Roman cross, and rose from the dead. These are historical facts.
Originally posted by TheSandMansExecutioner
Originally posted by DaveNorris
i know, how can we be soo stupid to beleive in beings that come from other planets, it makes sooo much more sence that they come from a mystical fairy world that we cannot observe in any way at all
We cant even "observe" the bottom of the oceans trenches. Nor the Dark side of the Moon.
So, by your logic neither exist.
P.S...How Many Beings from other planets have you observed?
Your a Troll...And Not a "Mystical Fairy World" Troll from under the bridge neither.
edit on 02/09/2011 by TheSandMansExecutioner because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by DaveNorris
Originally posted by TheSandMansExecutioner
Originally posted by DaveNorris
i know, how can we be soo stupid to beleive in beings that come from other planets, it makes sooo much more sence that they come from a mystical fairy world that we cannot observe in any way at all
We cant even "observe" the bottom of the oceans trenches. Nor the Dark side of the Moon.
So, by your logic neither exist.
P.S...How Many Beings from other planets have you observed?
Your a Troll...And Not a "Mystical Fairy World" Troll from under the bridge neither.
edit on 02/09/2011 by TheSandMansExecutioner because: (no reason given)
how do u know im not under a bridge lol
Originally posted by DaveNorris
funny, we have managed to see images of at least 8 planets, 3 dwarf planets, several moons and numerous comets and thats all in our solar system. given the fact that we can see hundreds of billions of stars in the sky, why is it so hard to beleive theres life circling one of them. no, instead people want to beleive in a mystical man with a beard sitting on a cloud and another man surounded by fire with a goatee and a pitch fork.
oh and ps. How Many Beings from heaven and hell have you observed?
how do u know im not under a bridge lol
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
Let's back off this particular subject for a moment and look at the word Urination.Urination Wiki To the Layman, urination is peeing. To an EMT, Urination is the process of making Urine, not passing Urine. To an EMT, the process of micturition is voiding the bladder. This is an example of Jargon-or job specific language that is not used in the same manner as the layman. The Bible is FULL of self-defined words (as in, by context, the word means something FAR different than what non-believers, and often believers who never go through an in-depth study are used to it meaning in their everyday life). This is not talked about all that much. For instance, Biblically, HOPE:
Uh....NO...Christianity is a RELIGION....as religion is defined in any dictionary.
I Corinthians 8b-12
A Ploughman or thresher works for his wage. A farmer doing his own ploughing does it for a new crop, you thresh for already gained grain, to seperate what you can eat. The Biblical definition of hope is EXPECTATION. But to non-Christians, the word hope has as much strength as wishing. Now, you plough for something you don't have, you thresh because you already have it. Generally, hope, with concerns about spirituality has 2 parts. Hope for the future, and hope for what you already have. It's rediculous to WISH for what you already have, but you can have expectiations surrounding it.
8b Or does not the Law also say these things? 9 For it is written in the Law of Moses, "YOU SHALL NOT MUZZLE THE OX WHILE HE IS THRESHING." God is not concerned about oxen, is He? 10 Or is He speaking altogether for our sake? Yes, for our sake it was written, because the plowman ought to plow in hope, and the thresher to thresh in hope of sharing the crops. 11 If we sowed spiritual things in you, is it too much if we reap material things from you? 12 If others share the right over you, do we not more? Nevertheless, we did not use this right, but we endure all things so that we will cause no hindrance to the gospel of Christ.
Religion means 2 seperate things to a Religious person and to a non-religious person. It's best to define exactly whose definition is being used for what argument. Or maybe those of us with as more technical definition, instead of a broad term, should have some pity on the laymen.
Don't get me wrong....if people actually followed some of the things that Christ was purported to saying.....then we wouldn't have to be bombarded by a Religios Freek on a Alien Topic. [/qote]1. No, you're bombarded by a religious freak on an alien topic because people started this out accusing CHRISTIANS of CLAIMING that ALIENS ARE DEMONS merely BECAUSE they are blind JESUS FREAKS. I've had to repeatedly state that I'm a Christians who doesn't give a rat's pa-twoi about what aliens are or are not, who's had to go to the Bible, like above, to explain things that should be obvious, but are not, and do deal with FALLACIOUS LOGICAL STATEMENTS. *sigh* The majority, if not all, alien/demon believers actually didn't start trying to prove that they were until SEVERAL PAGES IN. ( I nominally get placed here because I'm a Christian who believes it's plausible.) Cause and effect wins over accusation. Start paying attention to WHEN this turned on people. There are things that you are doing and saying that are triggering this converstation. Own up, sir. Now, does that mean that every single conversation in this particular forum starts with your side? Not necesserily so, but the other topics are seperate from this topic, and ought to be treated so.
Meek braided a cat of nine tails and drove people out of the temple with it. 1. Meek is not weak, it's the choice to submit your strength when apropriate--literally means contextually: gentle--and is translated as that in more recent versions. Like Andre, the gentle Giant. He still pounded people into the mat, but the man was not arrogant about it. 2. Modest is not the sole defining characteristic of being humble, but rather is about knowing your capacity and not claiming further. It also coincides with boasting being useless.
The person would be meek and modest and try to listen and understand people of different views...opinions and experiences....rather than force their ideals upon others.
What good is it to teach math? Can't that be figured out on it's own? Why do we have to teach kids that you don't touch a hot stove? Its obvious that humans have to LEARN a lot of what they do. Our instincts are quite low, compared to most animals--animals still have to learn.
Besides....what good or values are ideals that need to be EVANGALISED? If they had any real merit....people would be more than happy to find out for themselves...without any help.
and to realize that these ^^^ sinister and intelligent beings control their flying saucers with negative psychic energies from within, as they pilot these mysterious machines that are sometimes hoovering right in front of you and i ,as we walk along outside on a bright sunny day, or star filled night, totally oblivious to their presence, untill they need another human soul and then they will suddenly appear and make themselves known.
Originally posted by blocula
the grey aliens are "biological robots" that were created by demons, the watchers, using a combination of human dna and reptilian technology, as a portal into our world, like a space suit that they wear, a way for them to gain entry into our material reality. a half living, half machine, that they posess and inhabit to escape from out of their hell dimension, where they were banished to long ago,imprisoned by the victors in the long forgotten war of the gods and into our presence they arrive. the demons animate these biological exo skeletons, the greys with their own disembodied spirits from within, then inside their flying saucers, their inter dimensional craft, which are also human abduction, soul harvesting machines, they fly, they voyage into our reality and the final war between good and evil has begun...edit on 8-9-2011 by blocula because: (no reason given)
Absolutely NO evidence inside or outside the Bible that he was ever bit by a zombie or a vampire, or plain bit even. Real zombies, like is done in voodoo aren't dead, but drugged and made to believe that they died. It is funny to call Him that, I'll give you that, but there's no logic behind it because too many steps needed are missing.
Originally posted by Zeer0According to the Bible he died on the cross then he rose from the dead. What is a Zombie? Someone who gets bit by another Zombie dies and RISES FROM THE DEAD. So in terms your Lord is a Zombie Jew. Worship that.
1. Assumption: that what we are NOW is what God created. 2. It is possible to be RESPONSIBLE for something without being the CAUSE. Any manager can tell you that...in detail. So can a Captain, when he goes down with his ship. 3. He assumed responsibility, (when you pay someone else's debt, you've assumed the responsibility of paying their debt), but the burden can still be all ours.
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
First of all...if you believe that GOD created us....then by logic...it also means GOD created our FLAWS....thus GOD....is RESPONSIBLE....for any SINS!
It would have been far simpler to say: To call someone a zombie is to call them a brain-eater.
Originally posted by yaluk
Originally posted by Zeer0
reply to post by yaluk
Did i ever say he ate brains? I dont believe so
all zombies eat brains that is common knowledge. It is one of the pre requisites to be a zombie. I fear you may not even know what a zombie is.. I would bow out of this discussion if i were you .
1. Assumption: giving someone the ability is the same as MAKING THEM DO IT. Illogical. We don't send people to jail for LEGALLY SELLING A GUN TO A POTENTIAL MURDERER. We send the murderer to jail because he kills. 2. Assumption: That we know what God wanted out of the situation, in the first place. Even scientist will set up a test for failure, and still be totally right for doing so.
Originally posted by SplitInfinityAGAIN....your logic is FLAWED! GAVE us freewill.....GAVE....US....get it? It's GODS FALT for providing the conditions to SIN!
Considering that Demons are supposed to be "high energy spirits" it still fits with the whole concpet of Demons smelling of Sulphur. And I happen to agree with you on this one.
Originally posted by annella
The Sulphur Enigma seems connected with high energy phenomena. The similarity of ball lightning and UFOs has been noted by researchers. Also plasmoid energy and electrical discharge have sulphuric qualities in common with the full range of paranormal manifestation. Transmutation of oxygen into sulphur, by high energy discharge, can't be discounted.
Hmmmmmm...I dunno, seems some would disagree with you maybe.
Many scientist are out to prove that some, if not all, ethics are unnatural, but taught. This is still a wide randge of b.s. in this field.
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
While I have nothing but respect for your beliefs...as I do for anyones...I am also well educated and...."Trained"....and am familiar with T.A.'s concepts of natural law and ethics. Thing is....philosophy....and theory from people as historicly prominent as him....are of the same real life value as any person on EARTHS opinion....everyone has one and they are akin to....well you know.
Antagonising. Many Christians have NO moral disgust with Masturbation. Quit tring to incite arguments by intoducing words that REQUIRE debate.
People who study, teach or write about these things are simply performing a type of MASTERBATION.
1. Assumption: that there will never be technology that can produce heavier elements. 2. Assumption: heavier elements are only caused by a supernova. It may be the only way we've found, or that may even be a figment of some random Scientist's imagination (not saying it is folks), but we find new discoveries all the time that change how we view reality. So being this way, thinking this way, does not leave you open to the possibilities. Yes, have some skepticism when this is brought up, but don't automatically jump in with the dogmatic approach. I understand that later posts reveal you to be a bit more open than this, but the way this was stated was not open at all. If you can come across as closed minded, but not be, so can others.
Originally posted by SplitInfinityThe ONLY WAY that lower ATOMIC NUMBER ELEMENTS.....can change into higher number atomic number elements.....is either in the Gravitic Created furnace of a star....hydrogen to helium.....or in the case of heavier elements....byproducts of SUPERNOVA.....an E.T. craft can't do this. Split Infinity
Originally posted by annella
reply to post by MasterGemini
Really need a 'shaking head in disbelief' smiley here. Truly.
So this is the man you are on about huh?
Parsons had always been interested in occultism, but his path to notoriety really started in 1941, when he joined the California-based Agape lodge of Aleister Crowley's Ordo Templi Orientis. Parsons threw himself into the Eastern-inspired mysticism and hormonally inspired sex magic of Thelema, the religion Crowley had either devised or channeled from beyond, depending on your point of view.
SOURCE
Another sociopath and sex addict. Nothing like getting it for free and on tap.
The fact that you people ( ETs are demons) have to resort to mentioning/quoting these kinds of poor excuses for humanity is rather sick.
There is absolutely NO PROOF that Crowley and his cohorts summoned the devil, cavorted with demons, etc. A wee piece from the screeds Crowley wrote you have all leapt onto. Nothing more than a coincidence.edit on 7-9-2011 by annella because: (no reason given)
ETA: Ooops, forgot something important. Seems your rocket scientist was a mate of Ron Hubbard. Figures.edit on 7-9-2011 by annella because: (no reason given)