It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by radkrish
Bart Sibrel is a "master" of out of context clips and quotes. He takes those moments and tells his viewers what is "really" being said. He is a jackass who deserved what Aldrin gave him.
Originally posted by iNkGeEk
reply to post by GrassyKnoll
Let me first preface this by saying I in no way mean any disrespect to you or your views. I support your right to have your views, even if they differ from mine.
With that being said....I find the problem with dealing with someone who is so sure that the moon landing was faked, or someone so quick to debunk a moon landing is that even if I were to point Hubble at the moon, zoom in on some of the junk left on the surface by NASA and show them to someone like yourself, your first response would be "That's been Photoshopped".
Now, perhaps, you are the odd duck that would look at that pic and say, "Whoa! Ok...the moon landing was real. Cool. Thanks." But I somehow doubt that. But that's ok...it's that very thing that makes this site fun to come too.edit on 4-9-2011 by iNkGeEk because: crazy OCD about typosedit on 4-9-2011 by iNkGeEk because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Kitilani
Yup. I don't blame him a bit.
"You're a liar, a coward and a thief."
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Kitilani
Yup. I don't blame him a bit.
"You're a liar, a coward and a thief."
An object on the Moon 4 meters (4.37 yards) across, viewed from HST, would be about 0.002 arcsec in size. The highest resolution instrument currently on HST is the Advanced Camera for Surveys at 0.03 arcsec. So anything we left on the Moon cannot be resolved in any HST image. It would just appear as a dot.
Originally posted by Helious
Thats what you get when you call somebody a liar, coward and thief all in one sentence though so he should have braced himself, I don't know where that guy was from but around here, that will get you punched in the mouth, true or not.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Kitilani
The judge had a different opinion.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Kitilani
The judge had a different opinion.
Correction. It never went to court.
edit on 9/6/2011 by Phage because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Kitilani
Correction. It never went to court.
www.cbsnews.com...
But those were jury trials.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Kitilani
I guess you could say I made it up.
Or you could say I was mistaken. In any case I corrected myself.
Originally posted by Kitilani
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Kitilani
I guess you could say I made it up.
Or you could say I was mistaken. In any case I corrected myself.
How were you mistaken?
I am willing to go with that if you can make it make sense.
You said the judge had a different opinion. What was the mistake again? The fact that there was no judge and you had no reason to even say that?
Explain it to me. I am willing to believe it was a mistake. Dazzle me.
Originally posted by radkrish
reply to post by Helious
And whats so national security issue about the moon landings? I am not an American but the whole world like to know whats so secret about moon findings that they withheld from the public?
Is it moon rocks or Un-obtainium? In this day where there is no space race or cold wars, its sad to see the government and space agencies withheld information from the people citing national security as an issue. What is really the threat of revealing facts?
Very very immature for the U.S to act like there is still competition within nations of Earth when in reality there isn't.edit on 6-9-2011 by radkrish because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by wavemaker
Originally posted by iNkGeEk
reply to post by GrassyKnoll
Let me first preface this by saying I in no way mean any disrespect to you or your views. I support your right to have your views, even if they differ from mine.
With that being said....I find the problem with dealing with someone who is so sure that the moon landing was faked, or someone so quick to debunk a moon landing is that even if I were to point Hubble at the moon, zoom in on some of the junk left on the surface by NASA and show them to someone like yourself, your first response would be "That's been Photoshopped".
Now, perhaps, you are the odd duck that would look at that pic and say, "Whoa! Ok...the moon landing was real. Cool. Thanks." But I somehow doubt that. But that's ok...it's that very thing that makes this site fun to come too.edit on 4-9-2011 by iNkGeEk because: crazy OCD about typosedit on 4-9-2011 by iNkGeEk because: (no reason given)
You actually have to ask the question, why didn't the Hubble Telescope point their telescope on the moon? The Hubble Telescope can look at the farthest galaxies yet they don't have a high resolution photo of the moon. I'm sure that the equipment left by the astronauts can be clearly seen from Hubble Telescope but so are other things NASA is hiding from the public.