It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by GrassyKnoll
No human had ever claimed to have walked on the moon before the Apollo 12. The ONUS is on the Apollo 12 to prove they actually did.
No human claimed to have flown across the Atlantic Ocean before Lindbergh. You are welcome to believe he did, or believe it was some sort of magic trick. Same for Apollo. You can believe all the evidence or not. If you do not believe the evidence, you are welcome to refute it. That puts the onus on you.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by GrassyKnoll
Here is a satellite image at 0.5m/pixel (the highest resolution allowed for commercial use by the DOD).
geoeyemediaportal.s3.amazonaws.com...
Here is an LROC image of the Apollo 14 landing site at 0.5m/pixel.
www.lroc.asu.edu...
Considering that the descent stage is about 13 feet across
upload.wikimedia.org...
A Chevy Blazer is 14 feet long, what is it that you would expect to see?
Originally posted by ShiningBeneath
It's easy enough to fake evidence of a fictional event at a fictional representation of a setting if the only flow of said evidence and material for comparison is handled by you. I do however wonder how we have higher resolution pictures of places many light years away than of a place 60's technology, as crude as it was, could reach so much closer to home.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by GrassyKnoll
Here is a satellite image at 0.5m/pixel (the highest resolution allowed for commercial use by the DOD).
geoeyemediaportal.s3.amazonaws.com...
Here is an LROC image of the Apollo 14 landing site at 0.5m/pixel.
www.lroc.asu.edu...
Considering that the descent stage is about 13 feet across
upload.wikimedia.org...
A Chevy Blazer is 14 feet long, what is it that you would expect to see?
Originally posted by ShiningBeneath
reply to post by GrassyKnoll
No sweat. There's more about that which don't add up to me, such as the varied shadow intensity/light sources (what's going on in the bottom left quarter for instance; Shadows? Reflection? *shrugs*look artificial, but I'd rather not beat a dead horse.
Originally posted by DJW001
The problem is: you know those pictures where you can see your car in the driveway? They weren't taken by a satellite.
#1 Why would NASA use a low resolution BLACK and WHITE video camera to capture arguably the greatest event in human history?
Surely they could afford a colour one.
#2 Armstong's first step the first word's on the moon's surface. There is absolutely no joy, excitement or euphoria in his voice. If you were the first human to set foot on the moon wouldn't you show more excitement??
#3 Armstrong remarks how the surface of the moon is similar in topography to "much of the high desert of the United States".....hmmm did he make a Freudian slip? Was the moon landing faked in the "US high desert"...Area 51 perhaps?
The more I seem to examine NASA's evidence the more questions I have.
Originally posted by FurvusRexCaeli
Originally posted by ShiningBeneath
It's easy enough to fake evidence of a fictional event at a fictional representation of a setting if the only flow of said evidence and material for comparison is handled by you. I do however wonder how we have higher resolution pictures of places many light years away than of a place 60's technology, as crude as it was, could reach so much closer to home.
I would like to see one of these pictures of something many light years away with a resolution better than the LROC's 0.5m resolution.
Originally posted by DJW001
Ever jumped out of an airplane?
Originally posted by southbeach
reply to post by GrassyKnoll
There is a lot of suspect circumstantial evidence to suggest we did not go to the Moon - However,i for one trust my general self judgement and believe that when a man with the apparent integrity of Buzz Aldrin says he went to the Moon then that for me is good enough for me.
And the general and more relative point that you have missed is that why have we not been back?why are we still here on the earth?Why haven't we left the close proximity of our atmosphere in all those years?Figure that out or at least ask those questions and i'll tell you you're on the right track.
Originally posted by intrptr
reply to post by GrassyKnoll
I thought that one of the "proofs" that men have not been to the Moon is that men cannot survive outside the protective Magnetosphere (let alone atmosphere) of Earth. Low orbit missions like shuttle and ISS don't count. Leaving earth orbit in a soda can and standing in the full stream of the Sun's radiation on the surface of the Moon is supposedly lethal, right? I don't know, because nobody has ever shown me a study of how much radiation impacts the Moon from the Sun. Moon "soil" is sterile right? Like Mars? And Mars is further out. Astronauts are still alive today that walked and talked on the Moon. They haven't died of 22 cancers yet, so what's up with that? How come space is so lethal to satellites sensitive electronics and humans have survived so long after traveling to the Moon and back?
Originally posted by DirtyRed
Don't you think the Russians would have said something a long time ago if it wasn't true? Old tech and lots of guts got us to the moon.
Originally posted by LightSpeedDriver
Stanley Kubrick, or at least his not insubstantial film techniques, were used to make the Apollo mission footage. Jay Weidner has a DVD which has unfortunately been removed from youtube due to copyright infringements which explain in great detail how Stanley actually gave all clues in his movie The Shining. ...