It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by nearlyfabled
reply to post by Maslo
You bet that's the real face of Islam, but it doesn't mean that it's harsh or a threat to the West. When someone has their hand cut off for stealing something, do you think they can easily and consciously steal something again, while they use their only remaining hand to commit the crime?
Originally posted by Maslo
reply to post by nearlyfabled
Islam ideally is not a religion that is followed by people who are living under the laws of another country - especially a secular one.
This post, along with another post by a muslim I saw calling for criminalisation of homosexuality, shows that tolerance is in short supply in islamic religion, and they in fact often do desire to force their religious customs on others.
Originally posted by Maslo
I do not, I said there are both tolerant muslims and extremists.
Source, please. And no, something that happened hundreds of years ago is not relevant.
What religion doesn't want to force their religious customs on others. Care to point it out.
Originally posted by Maslo
Originally posted by nearlyfabled
reply to post by Maslo
You bet that's the real face of Islam, but it doesn't mean that it's harsh or a threat to the West. When someone has their hand cut off for stealing something, do you think they can easily and consciously steal something again, while they use their only remaining hand to commit the crime?
It is a cruel punishment. But my problem is mostly with that "stoning adulterers, killing apostates" thing.
Originally posted by catwhoknowsplusone
Yes, the Islamic lunatics are a genuine threat.
What other religion goes this far?
None.
You have said no such thing in this thread.
Nothing is black and white, and there are both peaceful and extremist muslims.
But congratulations on being the first person ever to require proof that the Christian Religion has forced itself on people....
Originally posted by catwhoknowsplusone
Yes, the Islamic lunatics are a genuine threat.
What other religion goes this far?
None.
Originally posted by Maslo
reply to post by buster2010
What religion doesn't want to force their religious customs on others. Care to point it out.
In some religions it is more prevalent, in some it is less. For example, christianity nowadays has quite strong "freedom and little government" meme associated with it. In islam, things like separation of church and state are much less accepted, along with widespread support for killing or punishing apostates, adulterers, homosexuals etc.
Originally posted by Terrorist
reply to post by Maslo
Hey hey hey, don't forget the extremist Christian terrorist in Norway who attacked in and near Oslo a month or so ago!
Originally posted by Maslo
My first sentence in this thread:
Of course it has, thats why I have compared islam with christianity in the past. Anyway, did you not saw my sentence about requiring recent examples, because old ones are not relevant today?
Hint: christian extremists in Africa
I would like to address the often-overlooked but the central question in the war on terror: is the Muslim outlook vis-à-vis terror sponsorship driven by Islamic doctrines?
FP: Summarize for us statistical analysis of Islamic doctrines. Muthuswamy: More than most religions or ancient ideologies, Islam’s foundational texts may be well-placed for a statistical analysis. These texts form Islam’s trilogy – the Koran, the Hadiths and the Sira. The Koran plays a unique and commanding role in the trilogy as it is seen to represent “revelations” from God, given through its messenger prophet Muhammed. The Hadiths represent sayings of Muhammed and the Sira is a biography of him.
By most accounts, Muslims attach great deal of importance to the trilogy in guiding their life. Importantly, these texts, in particular the Koran, appear to have remained in just one form over a thousand years. Hence, these texts can be seen as a reliable and critical “data” upon which a useful statistical analysis can be carried out. Bill Warner of the Center for the Study of Political Islam has pioneered the statistical analysis of Islamic doctrines and has come up with some of the most incisive and groundbreaking results.
Extensive discussion of his work is given in my book. But let me refer to a synthesis that stands out, and conclusively defines what we are up against: 61 percent of the Koran talks ills of unbelievers or calls for their violent conquest and subjugation, but only 2.6 percent of it talks about the overall good of humanity. The above statistical analysis forms the basis not just for contesting but even for comprehensively discrediting the often quoted description of Islam as a “religion of peace.” In fact, an appropriate and statistically acceptable characterization is that Islamic doctrines overwhelmingly preach dislike, hatred and conquest of unbelievers and that this material constitutes the majority of the content in the Koran.
Using this statistical basis, one may also interpret that the token “goodness” toward unbelievers is present in the Koran in order to camouflage the true intent of subjugating and conquering them. When this anti-unbeliever-rich Islamic doctrine is preached through mainstream mosques, one could justifiably claim that neither the mosques nor the people who deliver the sermons there nor those who listen to them are likely to develop a moderate outlook toward unbelievers.
The Christian Religion has forced themselves upon the world.... I have provided sources.
Nice edit there buddy.