It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

General: China Could Be Planning Surprise Missile Attack on United States

page: 8
42
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 09:52 PM
link   
reply to post by SLAYER69
 


Unique adaptation more than cultural invasion.

A method in the madness.

Chinese rap actually makes more sense to me than American...






posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 09:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by Raider of Truth
reply to post by Anoynymoose
 


....not to mention it takes NORAD 60 minutes to get 50 fighters in the air.


I believe the U.S. Air Force Global Strike Command would disagree.

Time it buddy...




posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 09:54 PM
link   
Yea, I'm sure.

The 60's called, they want their cold war paranoia back.



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 10:01 PM
link   
ATS. A website for kids who live in the video game land they play in and who think the real world is like video game land. I always keep thinking im going to come back here for rational, intelligent, logical discussion only to see delusional threads like this.



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 10:01 PM
link   
reply to post by Fractured.Facade
 



Global Hegemony
I'll ask again.

Who has already invaded whom?

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/67dc3d4fa8b3.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/37d1452662e1.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/b1412ed675c0.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/5176c9f9df64.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/7c54d1271e6a.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/8516634dc46e.jpg[/atsimg]

edit on 1-9-2011 by SLAYER69 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 10:02 PM
link   
i believe that in a conventional ground war,the usa would'nt be able to muster anywhere near the amount of troops that china can.chinas standing army, compared to usa, is at least 5 to 1 and probably more. the united states would have to resort to a ww2 style draft just to cope with the massive onslaught that china could inflict.if china lost 1 million soldiers there would be another million ready to go and they could do that over and over.if the usa lost 1 million soldiers it would be a savage blow that the country might not recover from "in time" to resist the next wave that would be let loose upon them...



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 10:03 PM
link   
Lets see... Lend a country trillions of dollars and then attack them to ensure you are never paid back?

American leaders circa late 90's maybe, but China?

Don't be daft.

Fail Thread is Fail.



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 10:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by SyphonX
Yea, I'm sure.

The 60's called, they want their cold war paranoia back.




Couldn't resist.



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 10:08 PM
link   
The worse that could happen is a proxy war. China has too much to lose to go head to head with us.



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 10:09 PM
link   
c'mon guys, I'm not American but I can't see China overtaking US economy any time this century, can't you see it was the same talk about the Japanese until the 80`s?, they create a military treat as always (terrorist now) was CCCP before, and economic (China now) was Japan before, and so you undervalue the real plans of the US shadow government that is far beyond those you see elected in Washington, we are talking about the power elites that even US presidents warned about.



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 10:09 PM
link   
reply to post by SLAYER69
 


You seem to miss the finer points of adaptation.

Culturally and politically insignificant, yet economically viable.... They needed to, part of the business models that have been so successful at luring large portions of the US business and manufacturing to China.




posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 10:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by SLAYER69
reply to post by Fractured.Facade
 



Global Hegemony
I'll ask again.

Who has already invaded whom?

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/67dc3d4fa8b3.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/37d1452662e1.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/b1412ed675c0.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/5176c9f9df64.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/7c54d1271e6a.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/8516634dc46e.jpg[/atsimg]

edit on 1-9-2011 by SLAYER69 because: (no reason given)
these images that you put up and their points are well taken,but those "pop culture/fast food people have nothing to do with those that are "running the show" in china and nothing at all to do with what their military might have planned...



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 10:16 PM
link   
reply to post by blocula
 


Was it absolutely necessary to quote that ENTIRE post?

/off topic.



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 10:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by anumohi
Chinas stupid, we have subs all around china waiting to deliver them to their maker. what the Chinese don't understand is the US's newest and most devastating weapons that far exceed the hydrogen bomb plus our space based laser systems that are locked on to all of Chinas satellites....Chinas got a really big surprise coming if they want to push the envelop


we owe them so much money,

yet we are staked out all over their backyard waiting for a reason to blow them to smithereens *ultimate bite-hand feeds ya*

anyways, it does look like MSM was pushing the 'China is a Threat' new to the public, but US has done that with like 100 countries already so join the line China.



note though, US seems to spend the most on military/defense, yet is the among the smallest military among big spenders, whilst china spends relatively little yet still has among the biggest militaries in the world.



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 10:19 PM
link   
reply to post by SLAYER69
 


lol. looks like big business pwnage.
we also have a zillion +1 Chinese restaurants here, too. I, for one, just had some shrimp fried rice and general tso's!
yum, I like me some china buffet~



The only way it would work is if we let them in...

given our track record, us serfs would only first find out about the Chinese invasion as they were in the middle of lighting us up somewhere. Then, we would all be hearing fables from uncle sam of how it was so 'unexpected.' Then down the road, our great grand kids would learn in school about how the world needed a way out of depression.......... yadda yadda

edit on 1-9-2011 by bojimbo because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 10:19 PM
link   
A far more likely scenario is that China will attack Taiwan and threaten the US with nuclear missiles if they interfere. The theory is that the US will not risk nuclear war in order to defend Taiwan. The point about Chinese ownership of US debt is a good one. If they ever start selling their holdings of US debt in large amounts, which they would be smart to do prior to any planned confrontation, then we should worry.



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 10:22 PM
link   
I don't think the guy actually meant that China was planning on attacking the US. I have always backed Wikileaks, and I don't think they would publish any sensitive information that would actually heavily compromise any lives, at least they wouldn't without editing it, but I think they overlooked the implications of this cable.

They didn't know that China would be able to tell that they had spies in their midst, because they didn't know how the information was obtained to begin with. So there could very well be US operatives/agents' lives in danger at this point. That is not a good thing.

So like I said, I don't think that this meant China is planning an attack on the USA, but that doesn't mean they won't attack in the future. I remember my grandmother, when I was younger, saying that if the US were ever attacked by another country, it would be Red China...I never asked her why she thought that, but I would probably agree at this point, since they are probably the only country that could go toe to toe with the US militarily.

If we ever do go to war with them, which is still unlikely at this point, we better hope and pray that neither side is stupid enough to use nuclear weapons, because if they do, the other side WILL respond in the same manner.
So without using nukes, a war with China would be extremely difficult to win. They have the infrastructure and form of government, communism, necessary to pose a great threat to us.

Remember back in 2007? The nuclear sub that snuck-up on our Pacific fleet? Not good. It would be more difficult to land ground troops, but it could be done. A big part of the war would be allies, and who's country could be used as an invasion point. Say if Mexico allied with China, it would be extremely easy to invade from into the border states. We have already shown how good we are at protecting our Southern border...

We should just pull a Canadian Bacon and go after Canada. Canada/GB would be great allies in a war with China. I am not positive that we could win that war. The possibility is there, but a big part of it is impossible to analyze, simply because we do not know of the super-secret advanced technologies that the military has. As in weapons I mean. Space-based weapons would be used as well. But again, if nukes are used, there won't be any need for ground troops, since there would not be any ground troops left.



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 10:24 PM
link   
reply to post by Fractured.Facade
 


It's called the "Western World" You seem to forget that Global Hegemony is more than just people globally using the US dollar as a reserve currency. Or economic power. If I went practically anywhere in the world and mentioned two people I'm pretty sure more often than not they would recognize them. Arnold Schwarzenegger and Madonna. Why? Because the US is in North America and has racial and culture ties to Europe, Africa, Asia, South America etc etc etc.

China? well, China is pretty much filled with Chinese.

Now not all those Spanish speaking countries are all up in arms like Venezuela and Brazil. Speaking of Brazil Well US companies have invested huge amounts of money building factories there. They may be part of BRIC but I wouldn't really worry too much about them or Russia well were at it. Russia's population has been on a steady decline now to the point that in a few more years they wont be economically viable. India will also be rising and be giving China a great run for it's money.

All the time the US wont be sitting still as many here wish...

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/48f569d5d902.jpg[/atsimg]
edit on 1-9-2011 by SLAYER69 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 10:27 PM
link   
reply to post by TDawgRex
 


"The “pattern” of exchange in the war will not be a surprise. Many people will perish as a result of starvation and disease. I would also submit that you already know if you’re safe or not. The trick is to not turn off your fear when you’ll need it the most. Australia is sort of interesting in what is unknown. After the war, they were not very cooperative or friendly (can’t blame them really).

It is known they did repulse a Chinese invasion and most of their cities were hit. They have a trading relationship with the U.S. but I would characterize them as reclusive and ticked off. "



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 10:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by SLAYER69

files.abovetopsecret.com...


... That belongs in the predictions forum here on ATS!

We'll see, eh?
edit on 1-9-2011 by Fractured.Facade because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
42
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join