It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
That's because we do not have a four compartments stomach, like cows do, and only one of those four compartments works as our own stomachs, all other compartments are needed to change the plants they eat into digestable food that goes into the stomach that works as the human stomach.
Originally posted by gentledissident
Wow, it had the opposite effect on me. I just figured that's why cows are so beefy. They go straight to the protein source, vegetation. So, everyone else that stops eating meat becomes fragile?
One (selfish) reason is that the meat is better if the animal is not stressed in any way, the other is that I don't see any reason not to be kind with any living creature.
Originally posted by nyk537
I suppose some may wonder....what's the point of treating them "kindly" and "gently" if they are still going to meet the same fate?
No, but they would taste better, and that's what most people want.
Will the chicks feel better about being killed and eaten if they are not handled "roughly"?
Originally posted by fbipeeperjr
The do-do bird would not be instinct if we found it great in duck sause.
Originally posted by ArMaP
reply to post by Jobeycool
Yes, there are better ways, in the EU the animals should be unconscious when they are killed.
Originally posted by Anunaki2012
Its time for Mankind to leave this planet, i mean serious..we all have to die..we are not worth it to live.
It's not the same thing, humans and chicken are different species and humans eat chicken, the Nazis did what they did to other members of the same species, and not for food, so while both things are wrong, doing it to the same species and without any real reason is worse than killing other species for food, at least in my opinion.
Originally posted by McGinty
Why is it wrong for Nazis to treat other races this way, but seen as ok to do it to helpless animals?
It's not human arrogance, we need food.
Originally posted by rexusdiablos
But why should they be killed at all? Their lives are worth more than mere food stuff. It's human arrogance to the point of delusion.
Originally posted by ArMaP
It's not the same thing, humans and chicken are different species and humans eat chicken, the Nazis did what they did to other members of the same species, and not for food, so while both things are wrong, doing it to the same species and without any real reason is worse than killing other species for food, at least in my opinion.
Originally posted by McGinty
Why is it wrong for Nazis to treat other races this way, but seen as ok to do it to helpless animals?
Originally posted by IlluminatusOculus33
I don't see how being a vegetarian makes one more compassionate. Hitler was a vegetarian and he mass slaughtered people.....
I don't know, from what I have seen it depends on the person, some people's organism appear to be more adaptable to a vegetarian diet than others.
Originally posted by gentledissident
Are you saying that this is only temporary, and I'm about to suffer the repercussions of becoming a vegetarian?