It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Q2IN2Y
If this hurricane turns out to be nothing but a strong tropical storm, I will resign from ATS.
Originally posted by exo87
That's very understandable lol!
Originally posted by My.mind.is.mine
reply to post by exo87
I'm not fear mongering, I'm HOPING!!
NO MORE JERSEY SHORE!
NO MORE JERSEY SHORE!
NO MORE JERSEY SHORE!
NO MORE JERSEY SHORE!edit on 26-8-2011 by exo87 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SeekerDave007
Everything you ever wanted to know about Hurricane Edna (1954) as a Storm to compare to Hurricane Irene
(Aug. 26, 2011 in terms of a ' Split Eye '.
docs.lib.noaa.gov...
Originally posted by evolv
Here you go guys. Play with the settings to get all types of cool views of this hurricane.
Naval Satellite Serviceedit on 26-8-2011 by evolv because: fix link
Originally posted by exo87
No It did not! It could be wind sheer affecting the upper body of the hurricane giving the effect it is splitting in 2. Hurricanes and cyclones do not split in 2 like cells lol.
Originally posted by muzzleflash
Originally posted by evolv
Here you go guys. Play with the settings to get all types of cool views of this hurricane.
Naval Satellite Serviceedit on 26-8-2011 by evolv because: fix link
If that photo is legitimate than it does appear to be a rather weak tropical storm.
The eye isn't even clear? It's totally filled in with visible cloud activity.
I am not an expert with this type of satellite imagery technique, so is it an optical illusion that the 'eye' section is actually cloud covered?
I google'd "Hurricane photo space" and got a list of pics all having open eyes with very little cloud activity visible within that eye.
I then google'd "Tropical storm photo space" and it listed photographs of hurricane shaped storms but with the eye section filled in with cloud activity which was clearly visible.
Am I wrong here?edit on 26-8-2011 by muzzleflash because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by seenavv
Small eyes—those less than 10 nmi (19 km, 12 mi) across—often trigger eyewall replacement cycles, where a new eyewall begins to form outside the original eyewall. This can take place anywhere from ten to a few hundred miles (fifteen to hundreds of kilometers) outside the inner eye.The storm then develops two concentric eyewalls, or an "eye within an eye". In most cases, the outer eyewall begins to contract soon after its formation, which chokes off the inner eye and leaves a much larger but more stable eye.While the replacement cycle tends to weaken storms as it occurs, the new eyewall can contract fairly quickly after the old eyewall dissipates, allowing the storm to re-strengthen. This may trigger another cycle of eyewall replacement.[8]
ACCORDING TO WIKI
en.wikipedia.org...(cyclone)
Originally posted by graceunderpressure
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/8043f03ce3d7.jpg[/atsimg]
C'mon people. Get it together. There's a dangerous storm out there, and peoples' lives are likely to be lost. Let's quit quibbling.
As a person who has experienced quite a lot of hurricanes in my past, been in FL for a LOONG time, I can tell you that Irene is nothing out of the ordinary and no there isn't a second storm eye... really guys, a second storm eye? What's next? "The guvament made da big swirlies!"?