It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
seeing how u understand will u give me a summary of with your mind in on cus i can only get 1/2 the page then i only still have my mind and without ue side ur data no double the space on my mind
Originally posted by jhill76
All of mankind started in heaven. They did not interact like the angels did in heaven in the beginning. More so like a placeholder. When God in Genesis said be fruitful and multiply in number, he was talking to all of mankind at once in heaven, as Adam and Eve was not on the Earth yet.
Also, the Bible is not a history book, it does not tell everything specific thing that happened. Other people were put onto the Earth after Adam and Eve in close proximity but not too close. This is how you seen Adams son go off and have children.
Originally posted by akushla99
Who really understands the process by which a creator, creates? The reason for 'genesis' is a moot one, and probably outside of our scope to understand properly.
Suffice to say, all cosmological treatises, describe some form of combination/recombination of elements. The Adam&Eve story talks of more than one combination, when read properly.
The final one mentions the breath of spirit infusing a clod of 'clay'. The mention of a rib in the story is an interesting addition, especially since the advent of our own research into 'life manipulation'.
Places where DNA can be accessed easily and plentifully are the bones which contain the marrow. The shin and the rib. I suspect the rib was a case of artistic licence...although, then again, it may have been the process by which this was being done at that stage.
Given the illustration, present in most cosmological treatises which describe the body variously as a 'vessel' or a 'vehicle'...the infusion of a 'driving' force would become necessary, hence the infusion of 'spirit'. The suggestion here (and it is in no way reserved for the Christian tradition) is that, the body is but a vehicle for the spirit, or soul - the breath of life.
Given that, the GODS, who made man in THIER image - by inference, were following a process, which would produce the given result, according to an 'image', or blueprint. The inclusion of the (on the surface) confusing use of the plural GODS, and THIER, image...points to the definite conclusion that those who created us were not necessarily THE GOD, but, HIS/HER emisseries who did so, under instruction, following a process, from a blueprint, using the DNA of the original to create another, which would accept the seed (which contains half the DNA) necessary to perpetuate the excercise outside of laboratory conditions. Man and woman.
Any mention or intimation that other 'beings' existed, should be taken quite literally. There should be no question that this did not all happen without some experimentation...hence, Nod, Lillith etc. etc. etc...
The rest is history!
Akushla
Originally posted by SouthernRain55
Originally posted by akushla99
Who really understands the process by which a creator, creates? The reason for 'genesis' is a moot one, and probably outside of our scope to understand properly.
Suffice to say, all cosmological treatises, describe some form of combination/recombination of elements. The Adam&Eve story talks of more than one combination, when read properly.
The final one mentions the breath of spirit infusing a clod of 'clay'. The mention of a rib in the story is an interesting addition, especially since the advent of our own research into 'life manipulation'.
Places where DNA can be accessed easily and plentifully are the bones which contain the marrow. The shin and the rib. I suspect the rib was a case of artistic licence...although, then again, it may have been the process by which this was being done at that stage.
Given the illustration, present in most cosmological treatises which describe the body variously as a 'vessel' or a 'vehicle'...the infusion of a 'driving' force would become necessary, hence the infusion of 'spirit'. The suggestion here (and it is in no way reserved for the Christian tradition) is that, the body is but a vehicle for the spirit, or soul - the breath of life.
Given that, the GODS, who made man in THIER image - by inference, were following a process, which would produce the given result, according to an 'image', or blueprint. The inclusion of the (on the surface) confusing use of the plural GODS, and THIER, image...points to the definite conclusion that those who created us were not necessarily THE GOD, but, HIS/HER emisseries who did so, under instruction, following a process, from a blueprint, using the DNA of the original to create another, which would accept the seed (which contains half the DNA) necessary to perpetuate the excercise outside of laboratory conditions. Man and woman.
Any mention or intimation that other 'beings' existed, should be taken quite literally. There should be no question that this did not all happen without some experimentation...hence, Nod, Lillith etc. etc. etc...
The rest is history!
Akushla
Thank you much for sharing. I think that this opens a new perspective indeed. And you covered a point that I had brought up earlier. Other people before/after Adam and Eve.
Originally posted by JonU2
Originally posted by SuperiorEd
reply to post by SouthernRain55
Genesis 1:1
In the Beginning (Time), God created the heavens (Space) and the earth (Matter). Let there be light (Energy).
So he created the heavens and earth before light? Which means he created the heavens and earth in the dark!!!!!!!!
Wow, this God dude is GOOD!!!
Originally posted by MamaJ
reply to post by coyotepoet
I like this......see when you combine ALL we know and summarize it...we are close to 'knowing" a fraction about the Designer/Creator.
There is a plan and the creation story continues....it has not stopped.
Originally posted by mythos
reply to post by ChaoticOrder
which is more or less the point i was trying to make... when dealing with ancient folklore, meaning and context morph. we can interpret (as is the intent of OP) the meanings, but we cannot truly, iron-clad, define.
the exercise (and wisdom, imo) lay in the interpretations. in understanding the mythic intent of these profound stories. then we are not bound to literal interpretations, nor trying to make sense of the inconsistencies, and instead can delve into the metaphoric intent of the human conditions these stories are attempting to communicate. Jospeh Campbell made a career of such things.
PS it is possible that Lilith is actually a carry over from Mesopotamian myths, and Adams consorting with her is a metaphor for the ancient hebrews early relations with their neighbors.edit on 21-8-2011 by mythos because: type-oedit on 21-8-2011 by mythos because: and another
Originally posted by SouthernRain55
Originally posted by MamaJ
reply to post by coyotepoet
I like this......see when you combine ALL we know and summarize it...we are close to 'knowing" a fraction about the Designer/Creator.
There is a plan and the creation story continues....it has not stopped.
Thank you for all the time it took you to reply.
Thank you for all the time it took you to reply. I enjoyed the way you spoke of God with such love and light. Lots of individuals believe Hell is right here right now. Another perspective to look upon.
reply to post by SouthernRain55
Lots of individuals believe Hell is right here right now. Another perspective to look upon.
Originally posted by MamaJ
reply to post by SouthernRain55
Lots of individuals believe Hell is right here right now. Another perspective to look upon.
Yeah....I actually think it is both. It is here now...and when we "die" we either go up..or we go down.
Originally posted by benrl
reply to post by SouthernRain55
My personal belief is that it was a summary of events that Moses could understand, remember the creation account was told to Moses, everything up to the Exodus was told to Moses by God.
Even as soon as cain it mentions other people on the earth and describes them as more primitive, perhaps it was a telling of the first Homo sapiens, and the people Cain went to would of been Neanderthals?
Do you know some of the first caves with bones from both species and tools they both used have been found in israel?
So there may have been peaceful mingling, infact that is what its starting to point to that we breed them out of existence.
So even the story of Noah was told to Moses.
If you where describing a very complex process to a child do you tell them even detail? Or do you summarize so the understand? What is more important to you, that the child know every single complex detail, or that he just get the overall point?
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
Originally posted by SouthernRain55
Originally posted by MamaJ
reply to post by coyotepoet
I like this......see when you combine ALL we know and summarize it...we are close to 'knowing" a fraction about the Designer/Creator.
There is a plan and the creation story continues....it has not stopped.
Thank you for all the time it took you to reply.
Thank you for all the time it took you to reply. I enjoyed the way you spoke of God with such love and light. Lots of individuals believe Hell is right here right now. Another perspective to look upon.
I have often thought that hell was on earth. Look around the world today and see all the wars and rumors of wars and civil wars, the world economoy in the tank and going bankrupt. Read the book of Revelation and correlate it to current world events and then the book of Revelation will read like a news channels nightly report.
Originally posted by SouthernRain55
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
reply to post by SouthernRain55
I choose to think of God like he is a scientist, since being the creator of everything he would have to know about molecules/atoms/protons/neutrons, ontop of medical sciences/DNA/RNA/virus'/bactierum etc. My theory is that he most likely created adam and eve through evolution. The reference to God making man out of dirt could just mean that he took the particles and elements found in dirt and used them to create the building blocks of life and maybe amino acids and maybe set the genetic template for life to proliferate. This, however is a scientific rationalization to an act of God that no one to this day can explain with 100% certainty because no one alive now was alive then. The only thing we really have to go on is dusty old tomes and faith.
I guess i have to say if you want the answers to these questions, youre going to have to wait till you die so you can ask him. I know i'm going to ask him, supposing that we don't have access to universal knowledge on the other side.
I think thinking of God in terms of a scientist is intersting. I enjoyed the way you described it quite well. I never thought of it that way before.
I believe along the lines that once we pass on we will know all, but if we don't immediately, I am asking right away! haha.