It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SouthernRain55
I recently came across someone's post on a thread that shed a new light on how one might interpret Genesis.
Originally posted by JonU2
Originally posted by SouthernRain55
I recently came across someone's post on a thread that shed a new light on how one might interpret Genesis.
Are you referring to my post on the 'Ancient Alien' thread? With regard to the Old Testament stating that there were thousands of people on earth when Adam and Eve were created?
THIS POST
Originally posted by sgreco
In the end, though, we have to realize that the leap from "maybe evolution and the big bag are processes set in motion by an 'intelligent designer'"
Originally posted by Kaiuk
I understand it as a story to teach kids a life lesson.
Originally posted by sgreco
reply to post by SouthernRain55
I am open to many possibilities, some I lean more heavily towards than others.
1) its completely, literally true. I'm not sure I buy that. It would mean that somehow our genetic diversity sprang from two people, which would be odd because if we ourselves narrow genetic diversity, say to marrying only within royal bloodlines, we begin to get genetic abnormalities resulting in fatality and nonviablity. It also means that at some point, everyone who sprang from adam and eve had to commit incest. There's too much of it that just doesn't wash to be literal.
2) its an absolute falsehood. Well, while not all religions have similar stories of creation, many actually do. Take the iriquois, for example, who believed there was a plane of dirt in the sky above earth, replete with trees and plants. The female dug for the precious roots she wished to eat of the forbidden tree and, in doing so, caused the ground to crumble beneath her and her spouse's feet and thus man and woman fell to earth in disgrace. Very, very similar. While I do not believe that women are due any sort of blame, I do think the similarities in many stories of creation might hold a kernal of truth about our origins.
3) It was a parable. Since the question originally was about the judeo/christian bible, lets discuss this possibility in those terms. Jesus taught in parables very much of the time. I recall Nicodemus asking Christ about heaven and Jesus said, "I cannot get you to understand Earthly things, what makes you think you are ready to understand Heavenly things?" I suspect if jesus had said, "well, you see, first there was the Big bang explosion of massive quantum singularity followed by an epoch of coalescence before there was even a solar system, let alone evolution..." I think the people of that time would've gone cross eyed. Now, gensis was written a considerable amount of time before the time of Christ. I doubt they were more ready to understand deep and weighty topics, so why not also use a parable? The parable of Adam and Eve could well stand in for a basic understanding of the creation of the universe and subsequently mankind's evolution.
In the end, though, we have to realize that the leap from "maybe evolution and the big bag are processes set in motion by an 'intelligent designer'" to "that 'intelligent designer' MUST be THIS one religion's deity" is enormous to say the least. Many creationists will provide ample counter-proof to discount evolution but can offer only blind faith as to why their god is the intelligent designer. I think the argument breaks down right there.
Originally posted by LightAssassin
reply to post by SouthernRain55
Genesis 1:26
And God said, Let US make man in OUR image, after OUR likeness...
I wonder why God speaks as if there are more than one of him when saying the above..
Then I read Robert Morning Sky's Terra Papers and it made a whole lot more sense
Originally posted by JiggyPotamus
The one thing that stands out for me is the superiority of man over woman. It just fits in so well with how women were perceived and treated back then, and even today in some parts of the World. So what I am saying is that this story, in part at least, is a justification for these actions. It could possibly have been partly designed to make women more obedient. I just had this idea, so it isn't something I have heavily pondered or anything.
Originally posted by Archangelelijah
reply to post by SouthernRain55
Creation was started with the ability to think with the mind and obtain wealth of the spirit with the heart creating our inner soul.
Humans previously had been at the stage we are at now. This system was reset for the new creation of humans to achieve the goal which was to defeat the enviornment and reach space like our last cycle by thinking positive of eachother and the enviornment.
Mankind and womenkind are the software of information while the Sun (Male) and the Earth (Female or Mother nature) is our hardware like a massive macro computer.
Technology made the pyramids to perfect mathematical equasions in order understand the wealth of eternal creation and the life and death of the spirit. The Sphinx represents humans king of the domain.
The serpent which sent Adam and Eve knowledge is the spirit of Earth itself which humans have obtained information and knowledge. This is Satans work as everything is negative and positive energy which creates fire.
Everything living thing on Earth from plants, animals, humans ect is Fuel (food), Heat (tempretature) & Oxygen which forms Fire in the fire triangle. The three dimensions of life.
Physical life burns us like fire which is a negative but our Spirit of Mind, Heart & Soul is our positive spirit which lives for ever with the presents of water! This makes humans like a living battery.