It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TupacShakur
reply to post by TheWalkingFox
I do. Here are some reasons why, taken from his website:
You don't really think that a lifetime politician is looking out for you, do you?
He also wants to abolish the income tax, end the drug war and let the freedom of choice be up to the individual rather than the government, and back the federal reserve with gold to make sure it's power doesn't go unchecked.
He has never voted to raise taxes.
He has never voted for an unbalanced budget.
He has never voted for a federal restriction on gun ownership.
He has never voted to raise congressional pay.
He has never taken a government-paid junket.
He has never voted to increase the power of the executive branch.
He voted against the Patriot Act.
He voted against regulating the Internet.
He voted against the Iraq war.
Can you tell me which one of those things doesn't involve Ron Paul looking out for the people?edit on 17-8-2011 by TupacShakur because: To edit my post
Originally posted by crimvelvet
One thing that people seem to forget is the President is NOT a king with absolute power.
So what can the President do???
1. Clean up the corrupt bureaucracy.
2. Cut out the wasteful spending in the bureaucracy.
3. Veto idiotic bills
4. Control American Troops in foreign lands.
5. Set the "Tone" of the Administration.
6. He appoints the heads of the federal agencies, including the Cabinet.
7. He also appoints the heads of more than 50 independent federal commissions, such as the Federal Reserve Board or the Securities and Exchange Commission, as well as federal judges, ambassadors, and other federal offices.
8. He conducts negotiations with other nations,
9. He sign treaties (must be ratified by two-thirds of the Senate)
10. He initiates the budget.
Given the actual powers of the president, Paul's stance on bring the troops home and reining in spending and cleaning up the corruption dovetail quite nicely with what needs to be done.
His stance on "Social Issues" are not much of a factor because no one including Paul is going to pull the rug out from under Americans.
Also his point of view is that he wants to turn the problems back over to the local government where they can be handled better and cheaper.
Originally posted by fooks
where is he on energy independence?
how is he going to create jobs?
what's he gonna do about big corps and taxes?
trade deficit with china?
the borders?
illegals?
healthcare?
Originally posted by 27jd
reply to post by MrSmith
Perhaps you haven't seen the recent telephone poll...
The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey of Likely Voters shows Paul picking up 37% of the vote, while the president earns 41%. The Texas congressman joins Mitt Romney, Michelle Bachmann, and Rick Perry as candidates within hailing distance of the president at this time.
www.rasmussenreports.com...
Originally posted by Freenrgy2
reply to post by awareness10
You know what's great about the 2nd video regarding "Corporations are people" is how Ron can so easily and willingly talk to anyone about these issues. My God, when is the last time we had President that could do that! Most modern day Presidents have to be very careful about what they say, for fear that the wrong soundbite will make it onto the airways. But Ron Paul tells is consistently like it is every stinking time. You can tell that when he speaks he REALLY believes what he is saying.
Originally posted by fooks
reply to post by Observor
the borders?
"I don't think he intends to change the US borders."
that's funny, i hope you are joking
illegals?
"He intends to uphold law. So illegals will be dealt with as per law"
fed or state?
"Market will take care of it."
"He is not even promising he will create jobs. He doesn't believe it is the President's job to do so. It is the market's job to do so."
"Market will take care of it."
"Again, it is not the President's job. He will let the market handle it."
=========================================================================
i've seen some awesome markets in my travels but the one he is counting on takes the cake!!
"Have I convinced you to vote for Dr. Paul? "
the heck with him, i'm voting for the market!!
Originally posted by awareness10
At this point i really don't think it would matter if he was a god or a devil, the people will choose
the One who can best run the Country and who has the Peoples best interests at heart. He's a
guy that listens to what people want.
Originally posted by awareness10
reply to post by Observor
Yes actually..
Paul has been around for some time and has a pretty good track record.
Obama... Who is this guy Obama anyways? He was virtually a nobody before
Anyways, what other choice is there?
Unless
The American Citizens take over and boot everyone one out of office, nothing will
ever change, not for the better the way it's going on now.
Originally posted by 27jd
Originally posted by TinfoilTP
The BBC was far more accurate than your revisionist historical account of the last election was. All you did was make excuses for him on his failings.
Find me the quote from Ron Paul saying he wanted to "legalize heroin? (yeah, I used a Z, cuz this is America )
Originally posted by 27jd
Originally posted by TinfoilTP
He let that small segment get out of hand and paint loser all over HIS canvas.
Some leader.
Where are his televised podium speaches where he takes command of his own campaign and tosses them fringers who were destroying his chances on the curb where they belonged?
I'll be waiting.
So, lemme guess, you don't have the quotes from Ron Paul where he said he wanted to "legalize heroin", and that he believed the government was behind 9/11 yet? You were defending the BBC article, so let's see those quotes.
Better get on it, cuz it seems like you went right back to trying to attach a small segment of outspoken supporters that you find obnoxious, to Ron Paul and his positions on leading the country. If you can't find me those quotes, then find me where he once told supporters to be disruptive, or defended disruptive behavior on their behalf. I asked you first, provide me those quotes, and then I'll get on looking for yours.edit on 17-8-2011 by 27jd because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
Well it looks like 98% of ATS is going to be dissapointed with the GOP nomination.
I'm just curious...does anyone honestly believe that this poll reflects reality of the GOP nomination race?
Originally posted by TupacShakur
What's up with people supporting Palin for her "electability"? Are some people voting for presidential candidates based on their popularity and charisma now or what?
Originally posted by Stovokor
If I'm not mistaken wasn't it only 17,000 or so people that voted in the Iowa ames straw poll??
Why should this poll be any less relevant? We were not paid unlike the real straw poll.
Originally posted by litterbaux
reply to post by TrueAmerican
We should do a joint venture of making bumper stickers that state "I'm voting for Ron Paul in 2012".
I'll bet you'd see a lot of those on cars/trucks.
We could even charge a dollar for them, then donate the money made for his campaign.
My mom says I'm a dreamer.
COMPLETELY AGREE! I was allowed to select 4 issues most important to me. I chose the important issues. Electability is NOT an important issue. I don't vote for people based on how likely they'll be elected, I'd vote for them based on what they intend to do when they get into office.