It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
By all means...... prove me wrong.
If you imply religious symbolism to a non-religion you make it a ... religion. Like Buhdism without the moral guidance.
I'm not Christian, and you're ignorant. Again, by all means... prove me wrong that at least 95% of all people who died believed in some form of religion.
If you were not so ignorant you would have read: Atheism deserves to be "offended" because it's not a religion and represented the smallest number of people.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
And ultimately why do Atheist care? Seriously..
Those that died are dead.
Originally posted by Lemon.Fresh
Reply to post by Annee
And a lack of symbols is unacceptable, is it gives prominence to a certain belief.
It goes both ways.
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
Originally posted by Rockpuck
The lawsuit was filed because the Musuem (on private property) was "partly" financed by the Government (who gave a grant to get the program started).
Pure Atheist ignorance.
Originally posted by Lemon.Fresh
Reply to post by Kitilani
I dunno.
Let's use our super-duper logic to figure out who wants to remove symbols.
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
How about I just call you wrong since you failed to even try to show you were right. It is not my job to research YOUR CLAIMS.
Ultimately why do Christians care?
Originally posted by Rockpuck
For the exact opposite the reasons I just stated? Just as any real religion would care.. but Atheist believe in nothing, so it shouldn't matter. Removing religious symbolism is a violation of the 1st amendment. Atheism, not being a religion, should not be able to trump other religions just because an extreme minority are "offended".
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by Rockpuck
The lawsuit was filed because the Musuem (on private property) was "partly" financed by the Government (who gave a grant to get the program started).
Pure Atheist ignorance.
You get government funding - - you fall under government law.
Simple.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
Perhaps this opinion gets me some hate, but perhaps Atheists would do well to recall what nation they are living in and what majority faith controls it by such a wide margin, the whole discussion is almost moot.
I don't want to see any harm come to Atheists, but they seem to treat the attacking of religion as a personal sport.
Originally posted by fooks
lif the other faiths want a symbol, let them put one up.
Originally posted by drew1749
My whole point is that it doesn't matter which religion is paying respects to the dead. They're still paying respects for the dead.
Respect is not bowing to the whims of those propagandizing their religion at hot spots. Respect is NOT making everyone look at a cross when they visit the WTC.
Maybe preserving liberty is an "intellectual" thing to you but I'm sorry, it doesn't look like you recognize them let alone how to preserve them.