It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by redoubt
reply to post by boncho
You have a strange concept of money. And no understanding of Geopolitics and Social Nuances.
I was looking for comments on the concept, not a pissing match. I appreciate your time but... I'm not here to discuss personality with a complete stranger. Besides, you're probably wayyy too smart for me.
Thanks
We stick them in the nursing homes because we're able to pretend that they're being taken care of; without the SS coming in, we would be able to tell that lie anymore. I'm not any good at economics, so you may be right about the inflation; but I think that on the whole, private citizens would do the right thing in these circumstances.
Retreating into a little Bully Bubble like that only weakens your argument. You should use the opportunity to prove that you have a good concept of money and an understanding of Geopolitics and Social Nuances. He wasn't challenging you to a pissing match; he was challenging your ability to sufficiently form this concept.
Originally posted by seejanerun2
I agree with you totally.
My husband had a stroke and several heart attacks. He had a good job all of his life so he gets the most SS will pay. We can live on it just fine. (medical problems wiped out our 401K.)
If his check does not come on the 3rd, he will be dead by the end of August as we wont be able to afford the medicine that is keeping him alive. He isn't eligible for medicare for another year.
Somehow I doubt I will get anyone to charge these idiots with murder, but as sure as I am typing that is what is going to happen. I also know my husband can't be the only one out there in the same boat.
Needless to say I am very worried right now.edit on 7/28/2011 by seejanerun2 because: (no reason given)
I believe that those who try to do something will be less than a third. Too many people are satisfied with their entertainment (TV shows including entertaining news, facebook, cell phones, beer, etc.) to really care. When those who care about others try to stand up for them and do something about it, they will simply identify themselves. Then the authorities can tighten the screws and controls on them, round them up and put them (us) in the concentration camps.
If your SS check doesn't come, it will be owed to you. You'll get it eventually. I'm sure that there is someone, somewhere who will offer you credit for your husband's meds. Don't fall victim to this doom and gloom. Sure, if he doesn't get his meds, he'll die. So make sure he gets them. Talk to your doctor, see if he has samples. Write the drug company, they have programs. Stand at a freeway exit with a sign the says "NEED MONEY FOR HUSBAND'S MEDS OR HE WILL DIE!"
Originally posted by redoubt
reply to post by Solasis
Retreating into a little Bully Bubble like that only weakens your argument. You should use the opportunity to prove that you have a good concept of money and an understanding of Geopolitics and Social Nuances. He wasn't challenging you to a pissing match; he was challenging your ability to sufficiently form this concept.
Sorry, I will welcome comments on the subject but... I really don't want, nor will I respond to personal debates. I am not the subject... neither are you. If you want to be the center of a thread, tell us about yourself and I may offer an opinion. I just have better things to do... and I am now beginning to wish I hadn't come to ATS with this.
Originally posted by redoubt
reply to post by boncho
You have a strange concept of money. And no understanding of Geopolitics and Social Nuances.
I was looking for comments on the concept, not a pissing match. I appreciate your time but... I'm not here to discuss personality with a complete stranger. Besides, you're probably wayyy too smart for me.
Thanks
Originally posted by Solasis
I've always been under the impression that the most popular theorized/expected NWO groups want to remove the voting system.
Originally posted by zbrain75
Originally posted by Solasis
I've always been under the impression that the most popular theorized/expected NWO groups want to remove the voting system.
There is no need to remove the voting system. Your choices in elections are already fixed to produce the outcome the rich and powerful want. The parties have certain requirements for candidates and no candidate will make the grade unless they are in line with their bosses. In addition, the new voting machines can be easily set up to have any desired outcome. There are plenty of threads here on ATS talking about these things with evidence to back it up. Actually my job is in computer security and I know someone who knows this information personally. This information will never be in the mainstream news. That is all I can say on the subject without identifying myself.
The bottom line is that you really don't have a choice now so, regarding elections, you are already controlled.
Originally posted by redoubt
reply to post by Solasis
I came here to offer a concept in hope of finding some second opinions on IT... nothing else.
reply to post by zbrain75
Forget the politicians, they’re irrelevant. The politicians are put there to give you the idea you have freedom of choice – you don’t. You have no choice. You have owners. They own you. They own everything. They own all the important land. They own, and control the corporations. They’ve long since bought, and payed for the senate, the congress, the state houses, the city halls, they got the judges in their back pockets, and they own all the big media, so they control just about all the information you get. They got you by the balls. They spend billions of dollars every year lobbying – lobbying, to get what they want.
Originally posted by Solasis
Originally posted by SmokeandShadow
A contagious virus would better serve depopulation purposes. While systemic collapse would certainly kill many, it would not reach the goals of people such as the adherents of the Georgia guidestones or power brokers. I believe they would attempt to keep the infrastructure intact.edit on 28-7-2011 by SmokeandShadow because: (no reason given)
I can't believe I'm arguing for the sensibility of any of this, but---
A contagious virus would be far too risky. There's probably no way to guarantee immunity among the elite, and their ability to survive the crisis would be paramount to their plans. They would hide in bunkers, but that is far too risky for the aims and desires of any ruling group of that sort.edit on 28-7-2011 by Solasis because: (no reason given)