It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
For the record and to be completely up front: We will not be discussing or hypothesizes about Tiahuanaco being constructed by refugees of Atlantis, or Ancient Space Aliens
Originally posted by Majestic Lumen
I always wondered, why all the academics can't seem to accept the possibility of the "new world" having residents with highly evolved civilizations so far back in time. They always "short" them on the timeline
Originally posted by Majestic Lumen
Personally, I believe it possible, human life also began simultaneously in the "new world" as it did in the "Old world".
Originally posted by Majestic Lumen
All we can do today though since none of us were alive back then, is look at the evidence.
Originally posted by Wyn Hawks
...initially, racial and religious supremacy were the culprits... they no longer hang you or burn you at the stake for voicing an unpopular opinion but, still, the politics in academia is the controlling factor...
...takes a lot of integrity to buck an institution that you depend upon for your paycheck (or grants)...
Originally posted by Wyn Hawks...agreed but i dont know about the simultaneously part... if the combination of events can happen in one place, it can happen in more than one place... i'm partial to "it happened in 4 places"...
Originally posted by Wyn Hawks...how do you know i wasnt alive back then?...
Originally posted by Wyn Hawks...seriously - the problem with evidence is the interpretation part... for example - that photo of the infant with the elongated skull... some will interpret that as being shaped intentionally after birth... some will say its an alien baby... i say the baby was in the birth canal too long... can we all be right?... maybe...
But....
This thread wasn't about that!
Now was it!?