Parent complains after children were searched at pool... Bare behinds...

reply to post by journey2010


Were you there?

Are you strictly relying on the media reports?

Are you jumping to conclusions?

Let's see what really happened before we imagine the worst.

The children then pulled up their bathing suits and showered, he said.

I have learned from personal experience the media never gets it right.

reply to post by journey2010


They were looking at their trunks not strip searching the kids.

And if somebody has evil intent towards a child then whether or not they have swimtrunks on is not going to make a difference.

Originally posted by journey2010
reply to post by Ivar_Karlsen

 

Let us pretend that EVERY SINGLE kid listens to 100% of what their parents say. Let us also pretend that none of the 65 kids was sick and had uncontrollable issues.

Does that make it right for 64 other kids, who did NOT go #2 in the pool to be searched as they were?

I can see the obvious totalitarian reply now: if a kid was sick why didnt he come forward?

Because we all know kids aged 9-12 have absolutely nothing to worry about regarding peer acceptance or ridicule.

Funny how you can crap in a pool on purpose and your peers will think it's awesome and funny or crap in the pool because you're genuinely ill and receive nothing but cruel mockery from your peers.

Kids are sick and evil like that. Still, they shouldnt have to be subjected to some angry idiot on a power trip forcing them to drop and spread.

They weren't forced to drop and spread. Funny how you guys always start adding things to the story to make it sound worse than it was.

What lies are you going to add next?

Nobody even is claiming molestation.

They are claiming the boy was traumatized.

This had to be highly supervised.

reply to post by kro32


I have never said "drop and spread". BUT, they did have to drop their trunks in front of a counselor - which means they had to expose their behinds.

reply to post by whyamIhere


So are you meaning that being traumatized at at day camp is ok?

I'm really trying hard not to laugh at you for making world war 3 because a kid had to expose their behind for a second.

There are hallmark cards with kids showing their bare butt.

Don't you think there are bigger issues in the world than this?

reply to post by journey2010


Somebody is dumping in the pool.

What is your solution?

This is a serious health issue.

reply to post by whyamIhere


Since when?

There have been turds in pools since the invention of pool. When was the last e.coli outbreak due to a turd in the pool?

And how does checking out kid rear get the turd out of the pool?

reply to post by thisguyrighthere


They were checking the trunks according to the article not the rears.

Quit making stuff up.

NOT OK - - in any way shape or form.

An in-depth serious investigations needs to be done - - - in regards to this violation of minors.

reply to post by kro32


Right. So I pull my pants down in front of you and all you can see are my skidmarks, right? My bare ass isnt floating there in front of your face?

Originally posted by kro32
reply to post by thisguyrighthere

 

They were checking the trunks according to the article not the rears.

Quit making stuff up.

Searching anything - any part of a minor in the area covered by "trunks" is NOT OK.

It is in violation of personal rights.

This a very serious situation.

reply to post by thisguyrighthere


Lol so your upset with some counseler seeing a bunch of kids butts?

I feel more sorry for the counseler having to endure that than I do for the kids. I wonder if they were betting who could get the loudest fart off when he was inspecting lol

reply to post by kro32


WW3? Really? Are you that immature, stupid, illiterate, and plain old fashioned dumb to think that I am claiming WW3? WOW, this world really is in some trouble.

I am saying that 65 kids should not be forced to pull their pants down in front of an adult to check for feces residue... (Let's face it, pool water kinda washes stuff anyway...) They could have been forbidden from swimming, parents could have been called, etc. There was no reason for children to be forced to remove clothing, exposing private areas, to a "counselor:"

I am guessing that you think the TSA has every right to manhandle a 10 year olds penis too... Am I right? Every thread I post, KRO32, you troll. I really don't care what you think, and I am done responding to you. Make yourself look like a police state admiring sheep... I don't care. I know what children should and should not be subjected to... and this went beyond the limits.

Originally posted by kro32
reply to post by thisguyrighthere

 

Lol so your upset with some counseler seeing a bunch of kids butts?

Obviously I'm not since you said they never saw any butts. So it's a non-issue. Must have had some magic ass screens or something when the kids lined up to moon the counselors.

Originally posted by kro32
reply to post by thisguyrighthere

 

They were checking the trunks according to the article not the rears.

Quit making stuff up.

reply to post by journey2010


Just because someone disagrees with you is no reason to call them a troll.

If you can't handle people debating your stances perhaps your not emotionally strong enough to post on this website.

reply to post by journey2010


The crazy thing is what was the guard gonna do if they found what they were looking for. I call it a sneak peek by a freak, my kids and I would of left before they got the chance to do that, smh a bit intense 1 could say on the kiddies. Just clean the mess and keep it movin. One of the kids probably did it for shock attention in the pool

reply to post by thisguyrighthere


I never said they never saw the children's butts but i'm saying it's not a big deal and it's certainly not anything to do with molestation.