It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

8-3-11 Creepy Website! Can We Figure Out The Code?!?!

page: 157
165
<< 154  155  156    158  159  160 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 23 2011 @ 04:17 PM
link   
reply to post by Libertygal
 


I wonder what they're watching for?



posted on Jul, 23 2011 @ 04:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by Forevever
reply to post by Libertygal
 

I'm not sure but most of the items we've posted would fall under the fair use act wouldn't it?

I've been online since 1997, I've never considered anything I uploaded MINE once I uploaded it.

Its out there.

www.copyright.gov...


Exactly, but artists, especially musicians, do not share that idea. Especially when it comes to anything about making money. Copyright does not have to be filed for, it is assumed, but the way the internet is - global - there is no way to enforce fair usage VS copyright infringement.

Fair right usage requires a source. Look at all the people that do not give credit for their avatars, but they obviously use them from movies, musicians, etc. Some people even change the images to meet their own desires.

So, how do you enforce copyright laws fro the US in say, Argentina? You can't. Unless you have a lot of money, or somehow restrict the flow of information.



posted on Jul, 23 2011 @ 04:19 PM
link   
reply to post by Libertygal
 


Star for that post. I never thought of that angle. Very interesting indeed!



posted on Jul, 23 2011 @ 04:19 PM
link   
reply to post by Forevever
 


I think that's one of the best parts with no real answers It's almost impossible to get off topic anything goes well almost anything
edit on 23-7-2011 by violentz313 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 23 2011 @ 04:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by Libertygal
reply to post by Numb2itall
 


I think the material posted on their site is free of Copyright infringement. If people submit photo's, they are obviously free of copyright/fair usage violations. The photo of Belle, and why she was "informed" was to garner permission to use/photoshop the photo. There were obvious stages of her being informed revealed through the questions/answers. They did state Copyfight was not a typo. The mp3's are copyright free.

I think they are painfully careful about not infringing on Ciopyrights of any type, but if it is an experiment, perhaps it is to simply show one thing.

We have *ALL* violated Copyright law by printing/posting/pasting/altering all of the images and texts from their website.

Think about that for a moment.

It is the whole basis behind Copyfight/Net Neutrality, and the unreasonableness of trying to use US Copyright Laws on the internet. It *is* global, yes?

I cannot help, because of the obvious usage of Copyfight on the website, this is an in your face clue. Been saying that since I found this thread, and still feel it is deeply involved.

Basically, it is a test to see how wide and far this image is spread, and if indeed there is a Copyright on it anymore.

Copyright Law is pretty simple. Once you type, create, or post a thing, it is Copyrighted. You cannot Copyright an *idea*, but you can copyright creations of literature, art, and images simply by being the first to make them.

Hence, everything we put online... *every* image, creative story, poem, artwork - is instantly copyrighted when you click post.

If your icon is not free clip art, etc, you are violating a copyright if you do not have the original owners permission to use it, unless you give credit to the person, and it falls under fair use laws.

Almost everything on youtube violated some copyright law.

I think this is key - hence, the images are "key".


Damn that was good.
I guess I will see you all in court! Then in a CELL. lol



posted on Jul, 23 2011 @ 04:22 PM
link   
The picture of Belle is suppose to be two halves of a person so why are the light relfections in her eyes almost identicle?



posted on Jul, 23 2011 @ 04:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by Forevever
reply to post by Libertygal
 

I think personally, no mods have been involved because this has been an incredibly civil discussion

we've all worked very hard to keep it on topic ♥


But, mods participate in threads as members too. Quite often! Just some food for thought.



posted on Jul, 23 2011 @ 04:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by Forevever
I don't know why I can't find where they said all would be revealed ..... its going to make me nuts

but maybe we learned something from that question

if they didn't say all would be revealed, why didn't they pick up on that, they only picked up on the next step part.

Also, accusing them of saying something they didn't say... might be the way to get their attention


Well they might have had that one up and deleted it. I noticed one of the Qs from the last 24 hours has been deleted. The one about the photo names having meaning for the photo (the answer implied they didn't).

We need to start taking screen shots of the Q & A, since they are deleting some of them.

Again.... I think we are dealing with kids. Deleting content? Seems to me if they are trying to release some significant info they wouldn't be deleting Qs.

And then there's this post... which really... we expect these people to give us a medical cure, enlightenment, protection from an overhead disaster???


I know this may seem quite strange, but my female friends are beginning to grow fond of you, 175,000.. Why do you have to be more popular in Washington than I am? O . o

Be more mysterious. Bitches dig it.

www.formspring.me/8X3X11



posted on Jul, 23 2011 @ 04:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by Itop1
The picture of Belle is suppose to be two halves of a person so why are the light relfections in her eyes almost identicle?


They admitted they photoshopped the hairline and eye, and that the mouth is from one person. They also said the face is two halves.



posted on Jul, 23 2011 @ 04:25 PM
link   
reply to post by Libertygal
 


that I have no answer for

but they have U2U'd me



posted on Jul, 23 2011 @ 04:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by Libertygal

Originally posted by Itop1
The picture of Belle is suppose to be two halves of a person so why are the light relfections in her eyes almost identicle?


They admitted they photoshopped the hairline and eye, and that the mouth is from one person. They also said the face is two halves.


But the eyes are not 100% identicle, they are different eyes, only the relection in them are similar



posted on Jul, 23 2011 @ 04:27 PM
link   
reply to post by OneisOne
 


this morning I copied ALL of the Q&A into a notepad

I'm editing out the junk now - its a lot in there (like the whole 8x3x11respondedshareaskafriend)
I'm also deleting "can I spread this in ________" cause yeah, we all know they want it spread


once I get it done, I'll be happy to share it, I'm not even halfway yet - when I find really interesting ones that I think we overlooked, I post them



posted on Jul, 23 2011 @ 04:27 PM
link   
reply to post by OneisOne
 


Washington State, or Washington DC. So 175000 is male? This one makes me more confused



posted on Jul, 23 2011 @ 04:28 PM
link   
I still want to know that if they're not anonymous then how come we dont know who they and never will? seriously.



posted on Jul, 23 2011 @ 04:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by Konklar
If I were doing a research a paper on viral websites and internet meme, I would have hit a home run on this occurrence. there are no less then five distinct web groups debating what this web page could mean, and there are probably more. Me personally I've only been monitoring four sites. They've covered topics about Nazis, Aliens, Elenin, Cold war projects and have touched on other subjects also. They've thrown out a few bread crumbs, and now they watch the reactions of their subjects.

It's just a thought. I'm looking forward to the 3rd to see what happens.

The THX thing gave me a giggle


Greetings:



They've thrown out a few bread crumbs, and now they watch the reactions of their subjects.


We believe you have hit the nail on the head.

We were even thinking that Los Tres Amigos are behind it, as this "experiment" not only brings out the best in ATS'ers - exhibiting selfless dedication by assisting others in search of the truth - and at the same time, said experiment bringing other members to the point of exasperation, hand-wringing and even questioning their very sanity... as we said before - brilliant.

What a great way to further observe "humanity at work" and LTA probably take extreme delight in tracking the various "facts" that fit various scenarios.

It proves that that imagination - in a collective - can "analyze a situation to death" - and still be pointed in a completely new direction, and go there, to analyze that situation to death - positively brilliant!

Peace, Love & Light

tfw
edit on 23/7/2011 by thorfourwinds because: lynx



posted on Jul, 23 2011 @ 04:33 PM
link   
This is doing my head in, so many unanswered questions, i dont see the point in having a QA when they dont answer anything decent, only bother answering deadend quesrions.



posted on Jul, 23 2011 @ 04:36 PM
link   
reply to post by Itop1
 


You should ask them that...



posted on Jul, 23 2011 @ 04:37 PM
link   
reply to post by thorfourwinds
 

Agree, its definitely a theory.

Answers like this make me think its actually "something" though...


I want to make the "Prank" in the first diagram in Large City, The NorthWest, USA. Will that be ok?
It's not a prank. If you do send pictures. Mail us at [email protected].


but then they imply they're not here to help anyone..... ?

but they word things intentionally, which is the reason I'm going through all the Q&A again - I went first looking for stuff we missed - now I'm looking for discrepencies



posted on Jul, 23 2011 @ 04:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by kluskinoodle
reply to post by Itop1
 


You should ask them that...


submitted, doubt they will answer it thought lol



posted on Jul, 23 2011 @ 04:39 PM
link   
Had anyone else noticed the strange freudian slips throughout the whole thread?



new topics

top topics



 
165
<< 154  155  156    158  159  160 >>

log in

join