I know this is long, but just consider some of the things I have...
Okay, as matrixportal suggested, I went back and read again to see if anything stands out. It does.
Are you planning on bringing something down?
They reply: Like a roof? It's more of a retraction.
Knowing what I know about idioms, "Bringing down the roof" is a variation on "Bringing down the house" which according to
this site, means "Describes a performance or performer that is very successful and
wins over the crowd, eliciting a strong positive reaction, especially great laughter or a standing ovation."
Think about the word retraction, which I take to mean withdraw, take back, etc.
I feel like something we have already been "told" (not from these people) or have come to accept as "truth" will be taken back, kind of like,
"Remember when we said x? Well, we were just kidding..." or something like that. But it will affect us worldwide.
I also feel like they are answering things very carefully. We should see what they say and what they don't when responding, like maybe consider how
they could have answered specific questions and find reasons why they didn't give an answer. Or why they did. Anybody here have any experience with
kids? If you don't specifically state something, oftentimes they'll try to find a loophole to get what they want. For example, look at how they
answered the
question, "Is there any non-human member?" They reply, "One. His name
is Sam." I know some of you have torn yourself apart thinking about the answer, but maybe Sam is someone's dog? Or hamster? See what I'm saying?
Some other things:
-It has to be on
August 3, 2011. . That's very much an absolute.
-
It wasn't planned. But how long does it take to put something like this together?
If we go back and find when this was started, we may have another clue? Also, the plan is too much "in motion" to be stopped.
Too many people know? Too much, regardless of what has been found, is already out
there?
-THEY'RE not doing anything illegal - they never said whether or not what it pertains to is illegal. Governments or corporations won't be opposed
to what they're
DOING. Not what they're GOING to do on that date.
-The reaction will be mixed. It's up to you whether or not you're
"effected."
Not "affected," which would be grammatically correct. So, come that date, it's up to you if you're on board or not. Something tells me lots of
people will be rolling their eyes and saying, "Really?" rather sarcastically.
-Stop focusing on the disease.
-They're not in profit for this of any kind:
First example
Second example
Third example
However, this leads me to believe that the potential is there, but they are not in it for that reason. So if any money, etc., comes because of it,
they don't want it or will do something else with it. But, those who help spread the word can be rewarded if they choose.
-They do contradict themselves on occasion, saying they're doing it because you won't, then later on denying that was ever said.
-It's out of their control now.
-They also say they'll pick up the phone if we call...
-The message isn't violent/we shouldn't be scared. Now or when it comes out?
-Whatever is in the diagram is not a prank, and they want you to send pictures if you make it. They didn't warn you that you're doing something
illegal if you make it...
-They may be lying. When asked that question, they
reply "Would you know any better
than to believe us?"
-When they answer, "What country will be affected?" they say, "Your country." It was asked anonymously - it could mean the country that you're
sitting in when you read this.
-"Who ever said we were going to help somebody?"
link
-"People have all the information they need to make the next break through. They just seem to have trouble putting together the pieces."
I'm just fixated on this because they know something I don't. And whether or not I'm satisfied on that date, I'm okay because this has gotten me
thinking.