It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dolphinfan
reply to post by LoneGunMan
Making assumptions and basing policy on those assumptions is an extremely slippery slope. All rich folks were not crooks in the same manner that all great atheletes are not taking juice.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
I was thrilled to get a 10% raise at work! That 10% raise was $2400 per year or $200 per month. It made us completely ineligible for the food stamps! We had a net LOSS of $500 per month.
Since my #1 concern was taking care of my family, I went to my boss and tried to give the raise back or negotiate for a little more. Making $25,400 was not going to work for my family! The boss declined on both and was appalled that I would ask. My family had to make some major sacrifices to survive on my new "higher" income, and I kept the job and progressed over the next few years. Now I am making a lot more, and my wife has returned to work, and we are doing fine. Our situation was temporary, and the aid was used as intended.
Still, it seems like a ridiculous system to work in such a manner? Ridiculous that daycare costs more than a job making $10 per hour. Ridiculous that a very small raise can result in complete loss of benefits. Ridiculous that my boss didn't have enough common sense or courtesy to look at the whole picture. And we are one of the lucky ones! One of the success stories. I'm sure there are others that didn't turn out quite as well.
Originally posted by DZAG Wright
Just because someone has a flat screen tv, cable and x-box doesn't mean they are not poor! You have to take into account HOW they acquired those things. I can obtain any of those things on the street for a fraction of what you think they paid.
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Originally posted by DZAG Wright
Just because someone has a flat screen tv, cable and x-box doesn't mean they are not poor! You have to take into account HOW they acquired those things. I can obtain any of those things on the street for a fraction of what you think they paid.
The woman who occupied my apartment before myself had a big 50" flat screen, an Xbox and surround sound.
She got them from one of those rental places.
Eventually she sold them and some weeks later was arrested.
Prime example of how poor decision making helps keep the poor poor.
Originally posted by Cuervo
No... it's a prime example of how bad decisions make people go to jail. Holy crap, what a way to twist things. There are plenty of billionaires in Wall Street who made dumber decisions than that woman and they aren't poor or in jail.
Originally posted by Forevever
reply to post by thisguyrighthere
I'm inclined to think her choices were intentional so she would get arrested - some people would rather go to jail than be homeless
me: "Want to make $20.00 bucks?
him: Doing what?
me: raking leaves
him: How many?
me: $20.00 bucks worth
him: I can make $20.00 bucks standing here in a hour
him: How big is the yard?
me: Small
him: I don't have to bag them or anything just rake?
me: Yes you have to bag them
him: No Thanks
Originally posted by Alxandro
Ahem, don't forget about iPhones and Blackberries.
Originally posted by Forevever
reply to post by thisguyrighthere
I'm inclined to think her choices were intentional so she would get arrested - some people would rather go to jail than be homeless
Originally posted by dolphinfan
reply to post by DZAG Wright
If you were homeless, where did you keep your flat screen tv and xbox? Just curious.
The entire business can be underscored by your view of AC. It is now a necessity. It was not a necessity in the 70s. Were so many folks dying because of a lack of air conditioning that there became a government mandate to have ac? When I was a kid my father finally made enough money to get a window unit AC that they put in my parents bed room. We all slept on the floor in there during the summer. Did we sleep OK prior to that? Yes.
The difference between what is considered poor today and what was considered poor just 30 years ago is amazing. My mother used to darn our socks, cut our jeans off for shorts and then sew parts on other jeans when we got taller, we grew our own vegetables, she used coupons like a mad woman. We had no TV. We were fine and never took a handout. My father worked three jobs to provide for his family rather than take food stamps or welfare. Even if he could have taken them he would'nt.
Today all of these things are considered necessities and of course, everyone must have all of the necessities of life, right?