Woman Gropes TSA Agent's Breast at Security Checkpoint

this is such b/s un cool

Originally posted by AnIntellectualRedneck
Sounds to me like the authorities just admitted that the pat downs are sexual abuse, seeing as she's being charged with a felony.

Its not a felony. She was just helping out a TSA agent. She wanted to make sure the TSA agent's weapons were properly holstered. Sometimes they slip out.

Originally posted by jude11

Originally posted by timidgal
reply to post by Golithion

 

Great chuckle - thanks. Has anyone given any consideration to the though that just perhaps these might be average folks who are looking to earn a pay check? Pretty #y way, no question about it, but a pay check nonetheless. Not saying they're all boy and girl scouts, but I have to think that a fair share are just honest folks who leave work, shake their heads as they look at their reflections in their car mirror and then force it out of their minds because tomorrow night's dnner for the family needs to come from somewhere...

TG

Any person that puts money above human rights is nothing but a puppet and deserves no respect from neighbors, friends or family. Simply put, they are traitors.

If the Govt. wants to state "You are either with us or against us", then the same rules apply to our fellow citizens when fighting for human rights and especially the constitution.

Oh, come on. TSA agents are not the root of all evil. They are doing a job. We might disagree with the NEED for this job, but they are just essentially minimum wage drones. Attacking the least powerful is a symptom of a brainwashed and oppressed population. Dont fight amongst yourselves, go after the REAL culprits.

Also, no one is forcing you to fly.

As I was trying to post in the other bloody closed thread -

reply to post by Xcathdra


The fundamental argument is the legality of searches that involve touching legally specified areas of the human body.

The breasts and crotch are considered, by law, to be sexual areas of the body. As such, they are expressly forbidden areas to touch WITHOUT CONSENT.

Just because someone needs/wants to fly doesn't mean they give consent, no matter what that fine print says.

Under the strict interpretation of the fine print, the government has specified that sexual contact is legal.

Next time I'm at the grocery store I'm going to grab some guy's inner thigh.

The government says it's legal.

I wonder how I'll do in court.

So in another thread people were saying how when the TSA pat you down it is not sexual assault because you consent to the search by entering the security checkpoint.

What this women did is sexual assault because the TSA agent didn't consent.



So my point is this:

You have to consent to sexual assault before you fly now?

Does anyone else have trouble understanding this?

As far as the lady goes... She gave a little tit for tat... erm, tit for tit? Boohoo TSA agent, now you know how everyone else feels....

Originally posted by boncho

So my point is this:

You have to consent to sexual assault before you fly now?

Again, with the faulty logic:

Sexual assault is an assault of a sexual nature on another person, or any sexual act committed without consent. Although sexual assaults most frequently are by a man on a woman, it may be by a man on a man, woman on a man or woman on a woman,[1] adult on a child, adult on an adult, child on a child or child on an adult.

Sexual Assult

reply to post by Lostinthedarkness


A thread about TSA... Check
Flags?... Check
Stars?... Check




But seriously... I wish america had no security at all so we can go back to terrorism and drug trafficking.

i agree its our civic duty they might be sneaking weapons or contraband through airport.

reply to post by kykweer


We're being terrorized by our own government.

As I said in the other bloody closed thread, I'd rather be BLOWN up than FELT up.

Many people have died for our liberties. Let's not throw away what they've given us.

Originally posted by kykweer
reply to post by Lostinthedarkness

 

But seriously... I wish america had no security at all so we can go back to terrorism thread.

Its called irony.

Once we start to relax our security, some radical group will slip in and attack. Everyone will suddenly be saying, "Where did the TSA go? Why did they decide to scrap the security? HELP US TSA! HELP US!"

reply to post by unityemissions


What you fail to understand is that people will sign forms and/or enter contract into things without fully understanding what they are consenting to.


So while you have legal consent:

The person really doesn't give you their consent.

There are companies/people being charged, after tricking/manipulating people into giving consent into illegal activity.

reply to post by boncho


Dude, you don't need the bold text.

I'm not failing anything, you're failing to have common sense.

Show me a single individual who doesn't already know what they're getting into when they enter that line.

Originally posted by Section31

Originally posted by kykweer
reply to post by Lostinthedarkness

 

But seriously... I wish america had no security at all so we can go back to terrorism thread.

Its called irony.

Once we start to relax our security, some radical group will slip in and attack. Everyone will suddenly be saying, "Where did the TSA go? Why did they decide to scrap the security? HELP US TSA! HELP US!"

Or some radical group will use some means not screened out by the TSA, or the target won't be a plane. There will still be a catastrophe, and people will say, "why did I bother getting molested, this # still happened."

Originally posted by unityemissions
reply to post by boncho

 

Dude, you don't need the bold text.

I'm not failing anything, you're failing to have common sense.

Show me a single individual who doesn't already know what they're getting into when they enter that line.

edit on 16-7-2011 by unityemissions because: (no reason given)

reply to post by boncho


You keep switching the goalpost, man.

I'm not going to try and debate with a liar.

Originally posted by 2012srb
reply to post by kykweer

 

We're being terrorized by our own government.

As I said in the other bloody closed thread, I'd rather be BLOWN up than FELT up.

Many people have died for our liberties. Let's not throw away what they've given us.

Are you out of your mind? " Rather be blown up than felt up"... Your logic escapes me.

I mean personally I'd rather be alive and have my kids alive... Go through an airport guilt free on my trip... they can tough my balls I don't care... As long as I can get on the plane and feel like, yay we arnt trafficking drugs with mules or bombed, I'd feel safe and say, " those bastards won't get us this time "

You got to ask yourself, is this because you feel guilty? Is this only about anti government?

Obviously when your surfing on your internet, your government has never done anything for you?

Ah yes...the good old nipple-twister...always delivers

Originally posted by unityemissions
reply to post by boncho

 

You keep switching the goalpost, man.

I'm not going to try and debate with a liar.

Explain and I will readdress the issue.

i had to chuckle as i read the headliner.

unfortunately this wasn't a grope, it was an assault. a nice little feel would have been more on the standards with the "pat downs". but NOT grabbing with both hands and twisting. remember "purple nurples"? well they hurt like hell, and i'm a guy. i understand that for a female this would be grabbing a guys testicles and squeezing and twisting, definitely NOT COOL. the old hag deserves to go to jail on assault charges. seriously anyone ever consider that in today's job market this may be the only job they were able to get? i've been assaulted at work, and that is something that should NEVER happen. i rather hope they throw the book at her HARD, no less than she deserves.

people out there just need to CALM DOWN about these "pat downs", it's not hurting anyone. does the TSA go a bit overboard, well of course they do, just a product of all the fear mongering about terrorists that the government created. if you want to assault someone for it, i suggest the head of the TSA or even better the head of the government (good luck ,you will need it [umm maybe not the president all those guys with guns around not too healthy ] ). don't torment the line staff they don't make the policy but do have to follow it to keep food on the table and roof over their heads just like the rest of us.

reply to post by kykweer


It's quite simple really. I'm not afraid to die. I'm not a coward.

I'd rather have freedom than tyranny.