It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Anonymous Avatar
reply to post by fixer1967
If I remember correctly anything with under a 16 inch barrel is considered a pistol according to the BATFE. Again I am not 100 percent on this.
Obviously you can configure ARs and AKs and many other "rifles" with shorter barrels. If you have less than than 16 inch barrel you can not have a butt stock on the gun since it is considered a pistol.
Originally posted by Masinger
Originally posted by Anonymous Avatar
reply to post by fixer1967
If I remember correctly anything with under a 16 inch barrel is considered a pistol according to the BATFE. Again I am not 100 percent on this.
Obviously you can configure ARs and AKs and many other "rifles" with shorter barrels. If you have less than than 16 inch barrel you can not have a butt stock on the gun since it is considered a pistol.
For the armor piercing ammo law to affect a given caliber from what I understand unless something changed, there has to be a pistol with a 6 inch long or less barrel available to fire it. 7.62x39mm (AK-47) steel core ammo used to be widely available until Olympic Arms came out with a 6 inch barreled pistol for the caliber, for instance..
Originally posted by Screwed
Everytime i go to the gun range I am reminded of just how many people are in this country who own high powered firearms and that makes for alot of ammunition.
If the ATF is going to confiscate ammo I think it might me a little too late.
Most fire arm enthusiasts have plenty to get the job done.
Originally posted by macman
reply to post by fixer1967
Both kind of wrong.
A pistol is defined as a firearm basically being without forward grip and/or rear butt stock. Take for example an AR15 pistol. The barrel can be any length, long or short. It is manufactured as a pistol and engraved "Pistol" on the frame. Now, the AR pistol can't have a rear butt stock, but the AR does have a rear buffer tube, that can be shouldered. When either a vertical forward grip and/or butt stock is attached, the owner can complete a BATF tax stamp/form for $200 and walla, you have yourself an SBR (Short Barreled Rifle).
All this is, is a slow erosion of the 2nd amendment.
Plain and simple.
Originally posted by wonderworld
reply to post by Anonymous Avatar
I’m still waiting for coded ammo/serialized ammo with the database. It still may be on the table. If they cant grab the guns they will go after the ammo!
Originally posted by isthisreallife
Did I just read they're calling .223 rounds pistol ammunition?
How does that work? That's not even close to a pistol round....
Originally posted by Aim64C
It's just another bureaucratic bunch of nonsense.
For some weird reason, this type of round (I am not familiar with this class of weapon or ammunition - I'm only slightly more intelligent regarding this matter than the average politician/bureaucrat) has now been reclassified as a pistol round. Apparently, pistol-class ammunition has different regulations that apply to them - and these rounds are believed to be, by ATF command, to now fall outside of what is permitted, and hence considered illegal. Which means production stopped and a program for allowing current owners to turn in these rounds without penalty.
I see no reason to get all up in arms over it. It's not a 'gun grab' or an 'ammo grab' - just an ass-grab in politics.
The real issue is whether or not the government has the authority to regulate firearms and their ammunition.
On that token - if we are concerned about the government attempting to take away firearms/ammunition - it doesn't make sense that, if they cannot practically 'take away' firearms with dozens of moving parts and precision-milled components - they are not going to be able to take away the comparably far more simple ammunition produced in quantities several orders of magnitude greater than firearms.
Originally posted by Shamatt
Um.... could some kind soul please explain a couple of things for an uneducated Englishman who knows nothing about guns, ammo, or what AP and AR and all that other stuff means please?
Also, I have read the first 2 and a half pages, but can't figure out the issue, kind of..... I understand they are banning .223 bullets because they can be used in hand guns. But hand guns are legal in the US, so I don't understand the logic behind this. Why not just ban .223 pistols and everything else can stay the same?
If someone could clue me in I would be very apreciative! :O)
Thanks!
Originally posted by Shamatt
................I can't see the logic.
Originally posted by Shamatt
reply to post by ecoparity
Thank you, now things make more sence.
Actually, no, they still make as little sence as they ever did, but at least I now understand the issue lol.
On the one hand I totally agree that it should not be possible for the thugs to outgun the police in any way - who would feel safe in that scenario? - the problem comes when the thugs are actually the police. There is a trend in the West (not just the US) and I expect it will be American public, armed up and angry, who will be the last ones standing when SHTF. Not that it will do you any good of course, but at least you guys will get to go down fighting.edit on 12-7-2011 by Shamatt because: (no reason given)