It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Prime Minister Julia Gillard has said there will not be a tax on carbon while she leads the federal government. Deputy Prime Minister Wayne Swan last week said if Labor won the August 21 poll, there would not be a carbon tax during its next three years in power. Ms Gillard seemed to go a step further on Monday. "There will be no carbon tax under the government I lead," she told Network Ten.
Originally posted by ChaoticOrder
Here are the facts:
* Humans are destroying the environment is many, many disturbing and devastating ways.
* The Australian carbon tax does very little to nothing to slow down carbon pollution.
Originally posted by Janky Red
What's wrong with pollution anyways???
There is nothing to be done really, stop punishing
Polluters for being successful!
Clearly big business owners have conspired to
Increase their costs by devising this scheme.
You cannot stop pollution.
This is a sad day for the worldedit on 10-7-2011 by Janky Red because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Originally posted by Janky Red
What's wrong with pollution anyways???
There is nothing to be done really, stop punishing
Polluters for being successful!
Clearly big business owners have conspired to
Increase their costs by devising this scheme.
You cannot stop pollution.
This is a sad day for the worldedit on 10-7-2011 by Janky Red because: (no reason given)
Wow, what an ignorant view of the world!!
I know some people who disagree with your views:
Pollution concerns all of us. Look up the rates of cancer increasing, with many studies claiming pollutants being the cause. The cases of astma are on the rise as well.
To say we shouldn't act is beyond lunacy!!
Now, the real question is, does the tax help? Well, if it forces companies to come up with new innovative ideas to cut down on harmful emissions, YES. Another positive outcome would be to use that money to make up for all or at least some of the harm caused. Find new and innovative ways to offset the emissions somehow.
The disappointing outcome would be, if all that money raised by taxes would be used for something completely non-related, like defence expenditures, or building roads.
I haven't read up on that tax enough to know what they're going to do with the money, and if it's being used to offset pollution, or just as a deterrent.edit on 10-7-2011 by MrXYZ because: (no reason given)