A one-world government is inevitable, so why oppose it?

reply to post by MathematicalPhysicist


Simply put, the people in a localized government know how to run their local economy and policies to fit the people of that region. What holds valuable and important in the Congo may not be held to the same standards of people in South Dakota. Federal government has proven itself as a failure time and time again. Social Security, Post Office, Medicare, all going bankrupt. When policies are run at a local level they are more efficient and are more relevant to those groups of people. So what are the benefits of a bigger World Government? More failure, more rules, more policies of people who have no interest or policy of a random group of people. It’s really not a hard concept to grasp. Open a History text; it doesn’t take a graduate to understand that larger government equals larger failures. Stop wasting our time.

Originally posted by incrediblelousminds

Originally posted by liejunkie01


Wake up my friend........We are paying almost $4.00 for one gallon of gasoline? This is not necessary. This is proof that the rich are running the show.

So what do you think a gallon of gas should cost?

You do know that without US taxpayer subsidized price supports those prices would be even higher, right?

uh, pretty much what I said. The oil companies has our governments booting part of the bill.....Who is funding the government.......We pay no matter what....That is rigged.

reply to post by MathematicalPhysicist

A one world government? Who knows what it will be like? Will it be ruled by a democracy or will it be tyranny and slavery? Before the One World Government there will be a revolution and out this revolution could arise tyranny or peace and prosperity. We just don't know. We hope that good will prevail over evil but good doesn't always win.

Originally posted by liejunkie01

Originally posted by incrediblelousminds

Originally posted by liejunkie01


Wake up my friend........We are paying almost $4.00 for one gallon of gasoline? This is not necessary. This is proof that the rich are running the show.

So what do you think a gallon of gas should cost?

You do know that without US taxpayer subsidized price supports those prices would be even higher, right?

uh, pretty much what I said. The oil companies has our governments booting part of the bill.....Who is funding the government.......We pay no matter what....That is rigged.

edit on 10-7-2011 by liejunkie01 because: (no reason given)

Are you sure it's 'pretty much what you said'?

Because it sure read like you were saying it is 'unnecessary' to pay $4 a gallon for gas.

operation bluebeam soon, man made alien invasion / apocalypse scenario

Brain chip = pruning of emotion, intuition and mental conceptualization = willing drone = then and only then is a one world gov possible.

I will crush any organization that Bush Sr. is involved with.

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus


NO! You are wrong. Obama is a Marxist

A Marxist? You sure about that?

Why people keep trying to make Obama out to just be another Bush is beyond me. But truly, whether you want to call it communism, socialism, globalism, capitalism, cronyism, or whatever else, it amounts to the same thing, what Bush Sr said they want is the UN to run everything or right.

So, wait, are you saying he is another Bush, or isnt at all? Which is it?

This reminds me of some advice given to women over rape. Don't shout don't scream just go along with them and they might not kill you.

The prerequisite for one world government is agreement by "the world" that there should be one government.

Are we in danger of that or any other world wide consensus becoming a reality?

If the world's greatest military power took control of the world and imposed one government, that would by default also leave them in control of economic planning for the world. That would be a catastrophic situation, I think.

One world government would be "too big to fail". What would that mean? Never ending tax bailouts designed to rescue the psychopathic loonies at the top from their follies?

Some unsophisticated people say that illegal recreational drugs should be legalized and taxed, and that this would solve the numerous problems associated with criminalization of drug use. They're right of course, but it will never happen because it is not in the interests of those in the banking and law enforcement communities to see the revenue stream from illegal drugs widely dispersed in the economy. So anyone wanting to solve the world's drug "problem" will have to send DEA units, heavily armed, guns blazing, into the executive suites of some of the world's biggest banks.

Similarly a violent takeover of the military industrial complex by heavily armed pacifists would be necessary to impose a one world government, in contravention of their interest in maintaining a never ending series of wars on the planet among its quarreling nations.

Currently "one worldism" is being promoted by the criminal overworld, for their own nefarious profit maximizing reasons and by the naive for a completely different and unrealistic set of reasons.

Diversity is nature's way. We should have a "many government" world.

Originally posted by Rock404
reply to post by MathematicalPhysicist

 

A one world government? Who knows what it will be like? Will it be ruled by a democracy or will it be tyranny and slavery? Before the One World Government there will be a revolution and out this revolution could arise tyranny or peace and prosperity. We just don't know. We hope that good will prevail over evil but good doesn't always win.

That's the thing. Its not 'IF" - - - its How & Who.

It is inevitable - - that we will have a One World Federation. (I will not use the term NWO - because of the conspiracy aspect).

Another poster used the term "Federation" and I like that so I've adopted it.

I choose to be progressive and work toward a better world - - - which IMO is a One World Federation.

reply to post by MathematicalPhysicist


Why not oppose it?

Originally posted by ShadowZion

Originally posted by awareness10
Ok.. lets begin from the human perspective

We live in the Now - Eckhart Tolle

Time is an Illusion - Nasa 'and other notable scientists.

What you fight against, you create FASTER - Various brilliant minds ex. authors etc from The Secret Movie.

So what you THINK ABOUT YOU BRING ABOUT.

Do you really think fighting against the very thing you DONT wish to create will somehow Uncreate it?

No, not on this plane of existance.

The only way to undo this place is to refuse to focus your energy onto it and believe in it as reality. For that very act will create the reality you do not want!

Peace

edit on 10-7-2011 by awareness10 because: (no reason given)

Neither me, nor you, nor nasa know about the true meaning of energy and reality!

The Truth is.. ShadowZion.... Is that none of this is Real. So fighting against Dream Reality is Futile. You don't try to convince people your dreams are real do you? Ok maybe you do... nuff said.

Well done OP, I couldn't agree with you more. Unfortunately the misguided association between a one world government and a perceived corrupt dystopian world consisting of elite rulers and enslaved populations will be the basis of most of the arguments you will find.

Originally posted by MathematicalPhysicist

Originally posted by TechUnique

You have absolutely no evidence to support your ridiculous assertions. There are no "global elites" that want to control the world and reduce the population. No human organization can perpetuate this "ultimate plan" for years and years without any thing going wrong. That just not plausible.

''There are no ''global elites'' that want to control the world and reduce the population''.
Can I have some of what you are smoking!!!!
What about the CFR, IMF,FEMA, The Fabian Society etc etc. They are just doing whats best for everyone???
Do some research into these organisations and the people involved with them (because with your viewpoint you obviously have'nt looked into them) and then come back and try and defend the allegation you made above.

Originally posted by TattooedWarrior

Do some research into these organisations and the people involved with them (because with your viewpoint you obviously have'nt looked into them) and then come back and try and defend the allegation you made above.

Yes - - there are "power people" in the world.

But - conspiracy is not fact.

Will a One World Federation need powerful leaders? Yes.

reply to post by incrediblelousminds


Alright man, I see you want to pick an argument. Fire away. Even though this is off topic.

I do believe that it is uneccessary to pay $4.00 a gallon for gasoline. This is absurd, the world would prosper better with cheaper fuel prices.........But we can't have this now can we......Oil companies are making record profits with higher than needed prices............

The only way you can think that oil prices are fair, is if you own stock in one or some of the companies.

I am not buying that $4.00 a gallon is fair......You should'nt either.

Tell me please, why this is fair.

Originally posted by liejunkie01
reply to post by incrediblelousminds

 

Alright man, I see you want to pick an argument. Fire away. Even though this is off topic.

I do believe that it is uneccessary to pay $4.00 a gallon for gasoline. This is absurd, the world would prosper better with cheaper fuel prices.........But we can't have this now can we......Oil companies are making record profits with higher than needed prices............

The only way you can think that oil prices are fair, is if you own stock in one or some of the companies.

I am not buying that $4.00 a gallon is fair......You should'nt either.

Tell me please, why this is fair.

So you think the government should forcibly set the price of gasoline below market value?

Originally posted by HanoverFat
Well done OP, I couldn't agree with you more. Unfortunately the misguided association between a one world government and a perceived corrupt dystopian world consisting of elite rulers and enslaved populations will be the basis of most of the arguments you will find.

Are you trying to tell me that in a one world government senario that would'nt be the case?

For a one world government to be accepted by all means that EVERYONE will have to do as they are told, have the same ideals and morals - basically giving up your selfhood, you individuality, your religion and anything else that might be different.
The only way I can see this sort of control coming about is through the use of fear and through the use of drugs, because there are too many people who like me value what little freedoms we still have left and would rather die than live in a dictatorship, as in my view a one world government can only ever be a dictatorship.
What about the countries that resist this push towards a one world government? Will they be the victims of Western military campaigns like so many of the Arab nations are at the moment?

Originally posted by TattooedWarrior
For a one world government to be accepted by all means that EVERYONE will have to do as they are told, have the same ideals and morals - basically giving up your selfhood, you individuality, your religion and anything else that might be different.

No it doesn't it just means that there is authority just like the Feds over the individual states or the EU over it's member nations. No one is taking anyones individuality.

Originally posted by TattooedWarrior


For a one world government to be accepted by all means that EVERYONE will have to do as they are told, have the same ideals and morals - basically giving up your selfhood, you individuality, your religion and anything else that might be different.

Really? Based on what? Says who?