It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
I study Mexico: a diverse and fascinating country which, when it makes the news, usually does so because of narco-violence – an important phenomenon, to be sure, but one that deserves sober reflection, not sensationalism.
Juárez is not typical of the country. In fact, it is a grotesque aberration – seven times more homicidal than Mexico as a whole, 13 times more than Mexico City (the capital's homicide rate, by the way, is about one-third that of Washington DC). In other words, drug-related violence is highly variable within Mexico; Yucatán's homicide rate is less than Canada's.
Of course, the manner of conducting contraband (a very old story along the border) depends not only on demand in the US, but also on political and criminal organisation in Mexico (another old story). Thus, while demand has grown, central political control – once exercised by the mighty ruling party, the PRI – has given way to chaotic, decentralised conflict, in which rival cartels and their gang affiliates battle for power and profit.
Legalisation, Vulliamy says, is of "tangential importance". However, increasingly, informed opinion in Latin America – including Mexico – is seriously discussing it. Two ex-presidents (Zedillo and Fox) advocate this course; and Mexican public opinion favours an open debate, which President Calderón – his military crackdown having, thus far, failed – now also encourages.
Nogales, the main city in the region, which shares a border with the Arizona city of the same name, has had 131 murders so far this year, nearly surpassing 135 for all of 2009, according to a tally by the newspaper Diario de Sonora. That includes two heads found Thursday stuffed side-by-side between the bars of a cemetery fence.
Nogales, Mexico which is just across the border from Nogales, Arizona has had 131 murders during the first 6 months of 2010 compared to 135 for the entire year 2009.
Originally posted by NightGypsy
OP, I'm not understanding what your headline on this thread is supposed to imply. "A distorted picture of Mexico's drug wars?" I seem to read quite often about beheadings in Mexico. In fact, it seems to me Mexican drug cartels love to chop off heads. Is this not a reality? Are you saying this is a lie? How is this a distortion? I understand that this stuff isn't going on all across Mexico, but the murder stats speak for themselves. They are through the roof. Is this a fabrication? Frankly, I wouldn't travel to Mexico for any reason with all this drug cartel violence.
It's unfortunate that all of Mexico has to be bear the burden for what these drug cartels are doing, but unless you are gonna prove that the statistics are wrong, that top law enforcement officials and politicians haven't been murdered, and some police departments have had almost all their officers quit out of fear, then this "Mexico is getting a bad rap" argument is rather weak.
Originally posted by charles1952
My brain is very fuzzy tonight (maybe I shouldn't be posting), but I'd like to check if my understanding is correct.
Parts of Mexico are relatively normal, and parts have muder and crime rates I can only imagine (such as over four times the homicide rate of D.C. per the OP). The solution being put forth is for the police to stop agresively hunting the cartels, and the cartels will not kill as many civilians. (I suppose it would be allowed for one cartel to attack members of the other cartels.)
The reason for the Mexican violence is the War on Drugs, which should be stopped.
As I say, I'm fuzzier than usual. Have I got the discussion right?
The reason for the Mexican violence is the War on Drugs, which should be stopped.
Originally posted by Erongaricuaro
Headless corpses? Acid baths? This is a distorted picture of Mexico's drug wars
www.guardian.co.uk
(visit the link for the full news article)
I study Mexico: a diverse and fascinating country which, when it makes the news, usually does so because of narco-violence – an important phenomenon, to be sure, but one that deserves sober reflection, not sensationalism.
Juárez is not typical of the country. In fact, it is a grotesque aberration – seven times more homicidal than Mexico as a whole, 13 times more than Mexico City (the capital's homicide rate, by the way, is about one-third that of Washington DC). In other words, drug-related violence is highly variable within Mexico; Yucatán's homicide rate is less than Canada's.
If Mexico violence drops out of the news and we only see some cartel bosses being paraded then escorted away one can expect this is what is happening. I am predicting things will be much quieter here for awhile. Part of the deal would be to keep prohibition in-place and let the black market continue on but without the pressures of the past few years. The alternative would be for some real drug policy reform but that would not be the favored solution of either the government nor the cartels. Continued prohibition benefits them both.