ATS Reality: CoIntelPro, Shills, Freemasons, and Socks: The Definitive Guide

reply to post by Gemwolf


I know the tos.. and Ive had enough issues to know the manner in which I should go about handling the issue.. and as I stated and will state now for the last time.... ALL options that I should have do NOT work. thanks.

reply to post by Gemwolf


I know the tos.. and Ive had enough issues to know the manner in which I should go about handling the issue.. and as I stated and will state now for the last time.... ALL options that I should have do NOT work. thanks.

22) Disclaimer: TAN does not and cannot review all of the content of every message Posted and does not accept responsibility for the contents of any messages. We reserve the right to delete any message and/or restrict Posting rights on the message board for any reason whatsoever. Should you continue to Post messages that violate these Terms and Conditions of Membership, your account may be terminated, your ability to access to the Websites may be restricted or blocked, and your service provider(s) may be contacted about your behavior. Furthermore, TAN expressly reserves the rights under the law to take any other actions deemed necessary.

24) Right of Community Management. This is a privately owned discussion board community. TAN reserves the right to take action against any member, or member Posting, which is deemed to be devoted purely to disruption, represents behavior contrary to community building, or in cases where the content is contrary to the core ideals of the Websites. This action may include removal of your Posting and/or complete banning of your username and IP address. TAN reserves the right to eliminate or edit any content deemed inappropriate for the discussion boards, news network or any affiliated sites. TAN reserves the right to establish limits on topics that may be discussed if, in their opinion, the discussion of those topics attract an audience that is counterproductive to maintaining the ideals set forth in the Terms and Conditions of Use and the Terms and Conditions of Membership.

I wonder if people actually take the time to READ the rules,before they join?

Originally posted by Gemwolf
reply to post by GuidedKill

 

As I said before, we're not going to hand a soap box to someone that wants to dish ATS on ATS.

If someone stuck posters claiming that you are a murderer all over your house, are you going to leave the posters up because you're a "big boy" and able to handle it?

There are countless videos and websites created by members banned from ATS proclaiming that ATS is the big bad wolf. Links to these are posted in threads time and again, and time and again we remove it. This is not new, i.e. it's standard procedure.

I guess I could use ATS tactics and run outside under cover of darkness and remove all the posters as if they didn't exist. Then make my own posters and act like there really aren't accusations against me. That sounds like a much better plan.

But if you really like to know what I would do instead of reading my mind. I would like I said, STAND UP and face the people accusing me. For some reason ATS has chosen your plan......

reply to post by Gemwolf


I know the tos.. and Ive had enough issues to know the manner in which I should go about handling the issue.. and as I stated and will state now for the last time.... ALL options that I should have do NOT work. thanks.

reply to post by benrl


There are several threads discussing this issue. Feel free to use the search function and add your thoughts.

reply to post by Gemwolf


I know the tos.. and Ive had enough issues to know the manner in which I should go about handling the issue.. and as I stated and will state now for the last time.... ALL options that I should have do NOT work. thanks.

reply to post by sonnny1


I would wager, no, many don't, if any.

Just when certain things are questioned, will these points be pointed out.

The fact is, the rules is the rules, period.

I have questioned many things, in my time here, and have come to accept the rules.

It really is not that hard.

vvv

Is there any evidence to prove this is not a governement run site?

reply to post by Gemwolf


Oh okay, i tried to, they all seem to be getting 404'd and or referred to come here to discuss it by the mod, so I guess that is my roundabout answer.

Originally posted by GuidedKill
I guess I could use ATS tactics and run outside under cover of darkness and remove all the posters as if they didn't exist. Then make my own posters and act like there really aren't accusations against me. That sounds like a much better plan.

But if you really like to know what I would do instead of reading my mind. I would like I said, STAND UP and face the people accusing me. For some reason ATS has chosen your plan......

I'm not sure I understand the question. I thought we're here busy discussing the fact that people accuse ATS of being an ATS government agency? Nothing happened "under the cover of darkness". Everyone saw what happened. There are still threads that were not deleted but simply closed. I even made a statement in this thread describing exactly what happened. No one is hiding anything... I'm here facing you and everyone else having a go?

reply to post by VreemdeVlieendeVoorwep


The rules are rules thing is funny...

Especially on a conspiracy site...

More so coming from a site founded in a country based on the violation of rules...

No sire we do not like them rules enforced on us arbitrarily and on the whim of those in power with out explanation...

atleast we americans used to like to have a little representation and or explanation on these type of matters.

But I think the MODS, and the MEMBERS forget where we are, on the internet, in a Fricken conspiracy forum that claims to wish to deny ignorance, perhaps a little more understanding from both the people complaining about this, and from the MODS enforcing it.

Originally posted by GaVinCe
Is there any evidence to prove this is not a governement run site?

What proof do you want?

What evidence is there to be given, to make you believe it is not?

It seems that many have made up their minds already, therefore they have a preconceived idea, of what ATS is or is not.

To try and disproof your point of view, will be quite hard, since no evidence will suffice for those that believe what they want to believe.

This does not just hold true for the topic at hand, but for many topics, be it aliens, ufo's, reptilians, dentists etc etc.

vvv

reply to post by sonnny1


We get that it is within the rules, so much should have been obvious for everyone. We get that this is a private forum and that freedom of speech doesn't apply as such. This is a non-issue. What we are criticizing is how the mods and administrators use these rules to immediately delete any sort of inquiry into who ATS represent, and we want real answers to this obviously totalitarian double standard.

Now, instead of pasting the rules everyone already knew existed, please contribute to these questions. Why do ATS delete instead of addressing? They have to know how bad this looks, and how much we despise our own governments for doing this.

Originally posted by VreemdeVlieendeVoorwep


I have questioned many things, in my time here, and have come to accept the rules.

It really is not that hard.

vvv

Agree.

Not everything is a conspiracy.

Originally posted by GuidedKill
I guess I could use ATS tactics and run outside under cover of darkness and remove all the posters as if they didn't exist. Then make my own posters and act like there really aren't accusations against me. That sounds like a much better plan.

You're still here, aren't you?
So that sort of invalidates your claim.

Originally posted by GuidedKill
But if you really like to know what I would do instead of reading my mind. I would like I said, STAND UP and face the people accusing me. For some reason ATS has chosen your plan......

That's fine for the staff and the site, but it crosses the line when it starts naming normal, non-staff, members. They don't have to defend themselves, and ATS will use its T&C to protect them from such activity.

reply to post by GaVinCe


Did you read any of the links I linked to a page or two ago? Did you even read the opening post of this thread?

reply to post by benrl


My good sir

May I direct you to a thread I made about this very issue.

I was answered by a mod in that thread, and I accepted his answer.

Have a look if you will.

More Transparency is needed.

And no, I am not "pimping" my own thread, it is relevant to the discussion.

vvv

reply to post by Gemwolf


The video is what I'm talking about. Quit deleting it. Let the MOD's accused answer the questions and accusations being made against them. Hiding the video from ATS members does nothing to help ATS or the MOD's mentioned in the video.