It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Annee
Why are humans who have done nothing wrong - - naturally born with attraction to same gender - - still being persecuted in the 21st century?
Why are human beings of naturally born attraction to same gender being used as political fodder?
It is insane and inhuman. There is no excuse for this. None.
Fortunately - - current polls show a 51% acceptance of gays. It is the first time these polls have tipped in the majority.
Progression is winning over ignorance.
RWB News: In the early 1980s, ex-KGB agent Yuri Besmenov explained the stages of socialist/communist takeover of a country from within. He revealed the propaganda technique of ideological subversion and how it leads to demoralization of a nation to the point of destabilization, until communist takeover can be achieved (this is when they roll in the tanks) in a process they call “normalization.” He discussed the manipulation and inevitable demise of useful idiots once “social justice” is achieved and warned of the impending “world communist conspiracy.” When you watch this interview, see if you can figure out what stage America is in right now. In the subsequent 7-part seminar, Besmenov explains Communist Subversion in detail.
Originally posted by Senteri
That Republican actually gave a rather moving statement about simply valuing the rights of others. I guess that did not happen where some ATS members are coming from.
Originally posted by Senteri
Originally posted by Annee
I personally find it extremely offensive to class acceptance of homosexuality as a liberal issue or even a political issue.
Especially when you consider things like the fact that gay marriage passed in NY state thanks to that last Republican that voted for it, it seems like a weak argument to attempt to limit the belief they have basic rights to just one side of the political spectrum. That Republican actually gave a rather moving statement about simply valuing the rights of others. I guess that did not happen where some ATS members are coming from.
Originally posted by mugger
If you want a Christian viewpoint, it is against the Bible, along with pedophilia. I do know my Bible enough to recall.
Originally posted by mugger
As a Christian, I will pray for your soul, I am not to judge. Please, do not try and make my religion conform to your beliefs. Yeah, the Bible says to love one another, that arguement is moot for the Christian world, if they follow the Gospel.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Why don't you ask the UN people that question.
Originally posted by nuttin4U
I will say this...the homosexual SPIRIT....is nothing nice to play with. If people think, for 1 second...that this is 'normal', . .
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Why don't you ask the UN people that question.
We are not discussing the UN.
Or the NWO.
Originally posted by nuttin4U
I dont understand how you 'think' the BIBLE is not relevant?
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Why don't you ask the UN people that question.
We are not discussing the UN.
Or the NWO.
You mean YOU are not discussing the UN or the NWO,
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Well the Equal Rights Amendment was never passed really. That was for feminism though and not for Gays. Wrong argument. Under the Constitution, we already have equal rights. It's just that the traditional concept of marriage is being hotly debated.
Can you get any sillier. I am fully aware of the ERA. I'm a female of the 60s.
14th Amendment. Its Equal Protection Clause requires each state to provide equal protection under the law to all people within its jurisdiction.
Traditional marriage went out the window with its escalating divorce rate. Traditional marriage is a total cop out argument to deny same gender couples the same right to Legal Marriage.
But - that is getting off topic.
No, it isn't. This is part of the bigger picture, as I have posted on the UN Agenda regarding the Rights of the Child to explain further my point that the issue is being exploited to further the communist agenda of destroying the nuclear family as per the communist Manifesto and the ideas of Karl Marx.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by Annee
Just because he has a Reverend in front of his name does not mean he is a true representative of God's Spirit. He is reflecting the pc religious humanism side of the Humanist Manifesto.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
This is morally reprehensible and your do-gooder attitude won't change that.edit on 2-7-2011 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)edit on 2-7-2011 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)