It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Annee
I know this could be its own thread (feel free) - but I'm just gonna stick it in here on this thread:
In His Own Words: How I Went Undercover at Bachmann's Clinic
COMMENTARY: Truth Wins Out activist John Becker took a hidden camera with him to five therapy sessions at a Christian counseling center run by Marcus Bachmann.
PS: LOVE THE SHIRT!
www.advocate.com...edit on 9-7-2011 by Annee because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by hotbakedtater
I always find it telling when grown men (or any grown adult) is so worried about another human beings sex life. It says to ME that the one so concerned has severe homosexual issues themselves, and is almost always concealing homoerotic feelings himself.
And of course it boils down to this man being a pervert himself, as he is so concerned about how other men sex up their partners. Guess his wife must not be satisfying him, else why the intense interest in where other men put their penii?
Originally posted by TheLoony
So, why do so many folk care, and shout out insane crap like this? Is religion the only cause? It does make one wonder. We have seen the anti-gay politicians turn out to be gay - can't remember names but I know it's happened.
Originally posted by whaaa
Originally posted by TheLoony
So, why do so many folk care, and shout out insane crap like this? Is religion the only cause? It does make one wonder. We have seen the anti-gay politicians turn out to be gay - can't remember names but I know it's happened.
I don't even care if anti gay men turn out to be gay; it's none of my business but there is a hypocrisy factor to be taken into account isn't there?
Here's a list....I'm also a hypocrite..
www.ranker.com...
btw...all the men here that defend Mr. Bachmann.....hhmmmmm!
Originally posted by TheLoony
I'm "The" Loony and these folk make me look like the poster child for sanity.
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
The other side of the equation would seem to be that if these men were not constrained in admitting their sexuality (including to themselves), they might have been good legislators and valuable public servants.
Originally posted by Key-Minder
reply to post by Annee
Well, Annee, we can say the same for you can't we? The only thing immoral is the ignorance and judgement thinking people are naturally born into wanting sex from their same sex. Are some people naturally born to want their dog to lick them too? Should we let them just because they naturally want it? Maybe discuss it in public school during sex education? Or are some people naturally born to want to have sex with a child of 8? Should we discuss that since it's natural that it's ok? What about rape, Annee? Is that ok too if it's natural and the majority allows it? Where's the cut off Annee? Homosexuality dances on the bottom of the can of worms it opened because the pit of hell lays directly under it.
Originally posted by Key-Minder
Homosexuality dances on the bottom of the can of worms it opened because the pit of hell lays directly under it.
Originally posted by autowrench
Where do these people come from anyway? How do they get their faces on TV? How does one become so brainwashed?
In the seventies, the maturing New Rightists started establishing organizations of their own and promoting issues like "traditional values" which enabled them to make common cause with Nixon's silent majority. They also formed alliances with the Religious Right and with disaffected Southern Democrats. However, they remained excluded from political power, a situation which they blamed on the stranglehold of the old East Coast establishment over the Republican Party. It was only with the election of Ronald Reagan in 1980 that the doors were opened to them. Since then, the New Right and its allies have taken credit for delivering a series of electoral victories to the Republicans, to the point where they expect to have a controlling voice in the second Bush administration.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
Originally posted by Scoriada
Sorry but in my opinion, sticking your wee wee in someones booty does not sound moral to me.
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
dictionary.reference.com...
I think you can be moral and gay.
But that is my belief, yours is obviously different. Good thing we don't live under muslim rule or you would have been stoned to death.
Well I am female and I don't have a wee wee to stick anywhere,
Well I am not gay, but I avoid casting stones,
Where did I hear that quote,?
hmmmm
If we want to categorize sin, which one is worse?edit on 083131p://bFriday2011 by Stormdancer777 because: (no reason given)
In case you missed it, the second half of that story goes, "Go and sin no more"....
Not throwing stones is in no way meant to be an endorsement of any particular activity.
Originally posted by CaptChaos
Why is everyone so worked up about gays anyway? I'm not gay, nor do I care. As long as they leave me alone, they can do whatever they want. What difference in my life, or any of yours, does it make if they get married? Methinks they doth protest too much.
And this guy sounds gay for sure. The politicians and evangelists who are the most vitriolic about gays are always the ones that get caught behind the shed with the little boys.