It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by unityemissions
reply to post by traditionaldrummer
It doesn't have to do with a belief or facts, it has to do with having influence, and the people being behind you is a tremendous force not to reckon with!!
I admit, it could be a mere ploy of greed, but tend to think that population control is too common a thought amongst intellectuals, and more so the common "elite", so am not sure about this as being most probable.
Originally posted by Pervius
See how they can cut the worlds population? Very very simple to accomplish.
Sure, and that's an interesting take on it, one that should perhaps be investigated. I tend to be more interested in certainties than possibilities though. If this is a valid issue we should find out what these substances are and exactly how dangerous they are. Then discover who's using them and why. We need some fundamental facts to hone in the accuracy of our speculation.
Originally posted by BlackStar99
It's hard when the fda won't do any longterm studies on any of these chemicals.
Are dogs meant to only live to about 12 or so or are they all dieing young because they're forced into a backyard their whole lives, given the same tap water we drink, and are made to eat heat processed(which destroys nutrients) chemically enhanced garbage?
Are humans meant to just like to about 90, or are we all dieing young because of chemicals in the food, water, and air, with almost zero physical exercise? Not to mention we're almost all born from mothers who ingest the same things we do.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
...discovering the facts and truth rather than just speculating the possible scenarios. The truth may involve even something we haven't thought of yet! Dunno - we'll have to see where this takes us....
Originally posted by seiva7
how are you planning to discover the truth without speculating?
how are you planning to find the evidence if you don't see the obvious clues?
is that being skeptic, being ignorant of the obvious clues?
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
That's not it at all. I'm simply trying to flesh out the truth of the claim that a genocide is under way via the poisoning of food and water. We might look at increased cancer rates as an indicator though I haven't seen the link between the cancer and the alleged poisoning.
Originally posted by czygyny
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
That's not it at all. I'm simply trying to flesh out the truth of the claim that a genocide is under way via the poisoning of food and water. We might look at increased cancer rates as an indicator though I haven't seen the link between the cancer and the alleged poisoning.
I think on one level it is just business and the bottom line and keeping stock holders happy, but on a much subtler, deeper and insidious level, at least what I have been able to glean from things I've read in the past, that there is a group of powerful people who for generations have been very much concerned with world population and controlling mankind as a whole, who see humans as numbers and either resource-makers or resource-consumers.
...
So, while a rising cancer rate due to the toxic technology in our lives may be on the surface, an unfortunate byproduct of modern living, I think it makes a handy tool to 'poison' and help eliminate the burgeoning human population by those directing the world's future.
Originally posted by seiva7
what if the intention of "food poisoning" is not to kill but to dumb down humans?
that is already happening in the Western world and is spreading everywhere with the new lovely globalization.
we like to call ourselves "advanced" but is it really true.
are we just a cattle?
Originally posted by RightInTwo
Oh by the way. It's called survival of the richest. Why do you think it's so expensive to eat organic?
Originally posted by seiva7
Originally posted by RightInTwo
Oh by the way. It's called survival of the richest. Why do you think it's so expensive to eat organic?
eating healthy, eating expensive...
rich can afford the good food while the poor need to buy cheap bad quality poisonous leftovers.
Originally posted by czygyny
Originally posted by seiva7
Originally posted by RightInTwo
Oh by the way. It's called survival of the richest. Why do you think it's so expensive to eat organic?
eating healthy, eating expensive...
rich can afford the good food while the poor need to buy cheap bad quality poisonous leftovers.
To play a bit of devil's advocate here...most of us in the U.S. could stand to eat a whole lot less than they do now.
Perhaps it's time to consider quality rather than quantity.
As well, those who can, should produce their own. It is time-consuming but certainly worth the effort.
Originally posted by seiva7
but what would be possible means of getting "the good food" back?
Originally posted by Pervius
US Beef is now passed thru a nuclear reactor (gamma emitting radioactive source) to kill all the bacteria/viruses in it.
Originally posted by seiva7
I am simple saying that the things like almost all drinks except water and almost all of processed foods have some (many) additives that are very harmful for the humans.
Originally posted by czygyny
It is time-consuming but certainly worth the effort.