I am Not a Scientist

Ok, I have been urking yes urking here for a while and thought I would just come straight out with it. I am not a scientist. In fact I can not even read or write. I like string and my theroy is it is probably a little rope.

Anyway not sure where this post should go so mods please move to appropriate place? maybe in the bin?

So I am not here to woe you with my superpowers or lead you up the garden path. Hell why would I wanna do that?

No , I am here purely to write about nothing, get heaps of flags and stars and then tell everyone that the whole thing is hilarious.

Ok, mods anytime, the delete button is handy as I am sure this thread will probably go viral. So we better stop it before it takes over the whole wide world.

I am not too sure about where I am going with this but I did make a disclaimer That I was not a Scientist.

In fact I am an astronaught, a sort of astronaught anyway, if you get what I am saying.

Maybe the creative writing section? Mods.....

Anyway yes back to string....

Thanks for your time and I look forward to at least 200 flags and 1 millions stars

reply to post by guessing


Seen it work once before...

strong language

haha nice post S&F. I hope this isn't deleted, you're just introducing yourself as a person who is not a conceited "scientist" that thinks he knows the answer to everything

reply to post by guessing


I'm off to slumber sixth a big grin from this one . Thanks so much.

reply to post by lastbleedingvictim


Well boy am I glad that you put the record straight. I'll be sure to ask you plenty of questions not relating to the LHC and definitely nothing about string theory.







I do enjoy a good parody.

HAHAHA..best thing I have heard all mourning..Now if I could sleep..

This should be in jokes ..star and flag

theroy is not usually my thing but when it is paired with tiny, thin, rope-like mutter it is quite interesting, thanks for enlightening me.

What a waste of bandwidth....

Me neither.. who would have thunk it?

I don't like string, but my theory is the two cats do like it very much. Although sometimes they leave it alone, so I don't think they are addicted to it.

Back to me now .... I'm an aging silly git with weird ideas about things that cannot be proven without direct experience of it.. but hey, what would I know?

Oh.. I lied! I find string comes in handy sometimes.. mostly to tie around my finger so I don't forget to buy more string.

(Having a good giggle is never a waste of bandwidth)

Hrmm, the (1 pentyl-3(2-methoxyphenylacetol)indole) agrees with you, but requires a hint of 1(5-fluropentyl)-3-(1-napthoyl)indole to elicit a chuckle.

I shall throw in a shallow mix of C2H50H for good measure.


or it is burnt bread for us all again.

Originally posted by amongus
What a waste of bandwidth....

less of a waste than that other hoax thread.

Originally posted by badw0lf
Hrmm, the (1 pentyl-3(2-methoxyphenylacetol)indole) agrees with you, but requires a hint of 1(5-fluropentyl)-3-(1-napthoyl)indole to elicit a chuckle.

I shall throw in a shallow mix of C2H50H for good measure.


or it is burnt bread for us all again.

but that would make

pentylmethoxyphenylacetofluropentynapthoyC2H50H23,

I heard it is highly unstable?

Moduli really pissed you people off, didn't he?

*yawn* Seriously why even bother?

lol, thanks for the chuckle
I seriously hope you get your 30 pages and hundreds of stars as well, this deserves it as much as the 'im a scientist thread'
s and f because it made a good start of the day for me!

Originally posted by Tayesin
Me neither.. who would have thunk it?

I don't like string, but my theory is the two cats do like it very much. Although sometimes they leave it alone, so I don't think they are addicted to it.

You simple fools...

Have you tried adding a puppy to the mix? Of choarse not. Two cats and a piece of string is only as efficient as one of the two cats - it's simply cathematics.

You need to add an element to the mix, in order to create perpetual motion.

A puppy.

Then glue your cat to the upper side of a peice of burnt bread, and...



*NOTE* puppy is under you cannot see it. THERE IS A PUPPY.

So.. How does your string(rope) theory work?
Explain indeed

reply to post by badw0lf


It is not possible without the bread right?

It becomes so much clearer in diagram format, with spinning and exciting things to touch and look at.

Originally posted by guessing

Originally posted by badw0lf
Hrmm, the (1 pentyl-3(2-methoxyphenylacetol)indole) agrees with you, but requires a hint of 1(5-fluropentyl)-3-(1-napthoyl)indole to elicit a chuckle.

I shall throw in a shallow mix of C2H50H for good measure.


or it is burnt bread for us all again.

but that would make

pentylmethoxyphenylacetofluropentynapthoyC2H50H23,

I heard it is highly unstable?

lmao ))))))

Now I have my eyes to clear up, my nose to wipe and lets not go down there

Man I needed that chuckle - nah that was a almost break my chair guffaw )

hahahaha you gave me heartburn !!!! lmao


wow, that hurt.. lmao I love it when I laugh so hard I hurt..



I wanna wrap you up and save you for presents, that was awesome!! lmao!!