It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by incrediblelousminds
reply to post by The Old American
Hmmmm... Im starting to think you might be trying to avoid my very simple and straight-forward line of questioning.
But you bring up a great point, nonetheless. He campaigned on sending more troops into Afghanistan, and yet one of the criticisms republicans-in-hiding enjoy leveling at him is that he 'lied' about 'ending war'. Just one more example of the baseless, substance-less critiques from the hyper partisan former Bush supporting Republicans-in-hiding who now pretend to be Ron Paul supporting Libertarians.edit on 25-6-2011 by incrediblelousminds because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by incrediblelousminds
reply to post by The Old American
I merely asked you to list some of the lies you are referring to, but you seem unable to do so.
Originally posted by incrediblelousminds
reply to post by The Old American
Do you really feel it effective to continue with this clearly transparent deflection from such a simple request on my part?
Originally posted by incrediblelousminds
reply to post by The Old American
No, my initial request was to list what he claimed to 'change', which he hasn't. Youve had more than ample opportunity to answer such a simple request, and there are several sites like factcheck.org which could likely do this for you, but I'm beginning to suspect you havent clue of where to even start.
Please, prove me wrong in such myopic disdain and cynicism.
Originally posted by TheImmaculateD1
What is his vision supposed to be?
Continually let the rich do whatever the flip it wants? Continue the wars over energy? Have the US involved with every Arabic nation? Allow banks to do whatever the flip it wants to unchequed? Deregulate everything and anything? Or is it that there is a black man in The White House and the racists hate that?
To deny him a success means you deny The United States a sucess and to continually play into the "Left-v-Right" paradigm immediately disqualifies you from being involved in political discourse as you clearly are not proficient nor competent enough to firmly grasp what is going on!edit on 25-6-2011 by TheImmaculateD1 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by The Old American
Originally posted by TheImmaculateD1
What is his vision supposed to be?
Continually let the rich do whatever the flip it wants? Continue the wars over energy? Have the US involved with every Arabic nation? Allow banks to do whatever the flip it wants to unchequed? Deregulate everything and anything? Or is it that there is a black man in The White House and the racists hate that?
To deny him a success means you deny The United States a sucess and to continually play into the "Left-v-Right" paradigm immediately disqualifies you from being involved in political discourse as you clearly are not proficient nor competent enough to firmly grasp what is going on!edit on 25-6-2011 by TheImmaculateD1 because: (no reason given)
Good job. You just killed any credibility you had by bringing race into a debate about Obama. That argument is old, tired, and has been beaten to death with its own left leg. His race means zero. His policies are everything. A black man isn't on the throne, a self aggrandizing godling is. Later.
/TOA
Originally posted by kro32
He specifically campaigned on his ability to pass bills that would lower unemployment below 8%. We are now at 9.1.
That is a specific lie as he had no idea if his policy's would work or not.
Originally posted by kro32
Obama also promised to run the most openly transparant administration every yet anyone watching the health care debacle will obviously know this is far from the truth.
Out right lie.
Originally posted by incrediblelousminds
Originally posted by kro32
Obama also promised to run the most openly transparant administration every yet anyone watching the health care debacle will obviously know this is far from the truth.
Out right lie.
Is it a lie? His claim is he would be more transparent than any other administration, and I'm pretty sure he has been.
I totally agree that there ae serious problems with this admin's transpareny, but they are leaps and bounds ahead of anything preceding them, which was the origional claim.