Glenn Beck's motive for his entire fraudulent revolutionary movements are towards one thing.......I

reply to post by Chett


What if it is bs that it is you are taking away from people like Glenn Beck. It is amazing how many people have come out in public declaring they are speakers of the truth. This is to deafen the noise the real whistleblowers are making. Some people may be confident in what they find, but you have to be neutral minded, knowledgable, and on your guard, always!

Originally posted by seedofchucky
reply to post by incrediblelousminds

 

"Israel's are NATIONALISTS< not globalists"

lol what are you a comedian?

it only seems like israel (zionists branch not general population of jews) it only APPEARS like they are nationalists but that wouldn't explain all the spying , false flag operations , bullying , arrogance , they don't listien to the u.n , the usa , international community , there own people , they do what they want when they want. These are actions of globalist actions.

Not unless you are radially changing the parameters of what it means to be a 'globalist'.

Rejecting a world body like the UN and 'doing what they want' is a symptom of a NATIONALSIT agenda. Remember, the UN are the Globalists.

Seriously, it's like you people think "NWO" and "Globalist" are just synonyms for something you dislike.

Israel already has its arm in many parts of the world . But they don't like to broadcast it such. Like the taliban they like to blend in with the crowd if you will. Its very stealth and clearly you can see they doing a good job making it seem like its just a natioanlist movement. The zionists are taking the poor jews for a ride on the if your not with us your against us . Most jews have no choice but to follow the herd just like the rest of us .....but just sometimes some break free

What makes them "Nationalists" is not being a supposed state for Jews. It is that their entire existence affirms the idea of Rogue Nations, in direct defiance of the "Globalist" notion of world law.

meh...deleted.

To make my long post short..

They both suck.

Originally posted by SomeCheesyUsername
reply to post by sdcigarpig

 

I'm sorry to disappoint you. Muslim extremists did not attack the U.S on 9/11. You had best get doing some real research and start thinking for yourself. Otherwise, don't spew more disinfo!

ya, ok.



you might be right, tho, it might have been just regular muslims.


listen to beck, he could be a regular political phage or zorgon if he posted here.

eta; sorry guys, just using you to set the bar.

Originally posted by SomeCheesyUsername
reply to post by sdcigarpig

 

This thread is for people who already know the truth behind 9/11, Israel, the Birth Certificate, the Iraq War, the bailouts, the Bilderberg Meetings, etc. There is no room for disinfo agents here because you get caught too easy.

Several things:
1) Attack the argument, not the person. When you attack the person, you lose all credibility to your arguments, and it really cheapens the entire debate and discussion. Insults really are not needed and calling someone a disinformation agent without proof really is something that is not called for.
2) The truth behind 9/11 is like the JFK assassination, we will all be long gone, before it comes out and we have to make up our minds as to what that truth is. I for one believe that radical Muslim extremist pulled off a sneak attack against the USA. They started a war against this country and until there is no shadow of a doubt in my mind along with 90% of the population of this country and the victims and survivors of this attack, the general mind set is that is the truth. The point I made, you did not dispute or even offer some form of reasonable explanation as to why the leader of a group of Muslims did this act, and further more why an 2 Islamic countries were protecting him. That does not bode well to prove that this was anything other than what it appears to be, an attack by the extremist, now terrorist, against the USA.
3) The birth Certificate: And what ultimately makes a citizen of the USA? According to the Constitution of the USA and all federal laws and regulations the following: According to all facts, even before the release of the birth certificate was as follows: He was born in Hawaii, to a mother who is (or was) a citizen of the USA being from Indiana, and a national of Kenya. Now in the laws that are very clear cut, both qualify a person to be a naturalized citizen of the USA. If there is any more qualification than that, it needs to be presented. And according to all legal precedents, that a child who is a naturalized citizen of the USA, reaches 18, and holds a dual citizenship, that child has the right to ask for the citizenship of his choice.
3) And like so many others, you failed to see the context that the speech was given. Many would condemn the US military for doing what they were ordered to, and blaming them, yet fail to point the finger and hold those accountable who are responsible for those actions and allowed such: The US congress, as they hold the purse strings and can ultimately stop any conflicts that they desire at any time.
4) Here again, the argument on the Bilderberg meetings tend to be a point of contention. No one who is not there, can not really say what does or does not go on in there. And would you want to take the blame if one of the very people who attend gets assaulted or assassinated, or a lot of them? No one would want that, and no country would dare want to be put in that position, so would it not make sense that to prevent an international incident, and possible war that security would be of the highest and no one who is not invited left out of it? Like all secret organizations, unless you are in there, you can not really say what all is going on in such.
Every point that was disputed, was done with a combination of common sense, research and first hand knowledge.
For the record, I am not a disinfo agent. Disinfo Agents would do what was claimed, rather they attack the messenger and try to discredit them, not the argument.

reply to post by SomeCheesyUsername

Either Glenn Beck is an entertainer, a political commentator. . . .

or

a vampire, bildenborg, Nirubu, soul-stealing globalist.

Don't cut yourself on Occams' Razor.

I've heard people call Beck plenty of things, but this has to be a first!
I will look forward to further threads by you. While complex, they are also entertaining.

reply to post by sdcigarpig

Glenn Beck, while many would state he is a fraud has a track record that far exceeds what many others would state. A large percentage of his predictions have come to pass. A man, whose entire show based around research, not reporting the news, so terrified a presidency to the point where they went to war against him. The man has to be doing something right to do that, can surely not be a fraud.

He has no track record at all, I can't remember a single prediction of his on anyone's lips...entire show based on research? Are YOU Glenn Beck using an alias? He is the only one who ever accuses his show of being all about research. Among the rest of the news world his inaccuracy is legendary. A war against him? That has an element of humor in it too. And lastly no he doesn't and yes he can.

All Glenn Beck been able to do from what I can see, is get the already deluded and malleable to follow along but everyone else hating on Israel. If I didn't know better I would say he is working AGAINST Israel since people will transfer their distrust and suspicion of HIM to that country. I already see a big up-tic in antisemitism. You can blame Beck and his rhetoric turning people completely off.

reply to post by sdcigarpig


This isn’t a game. Peoples’ lives are at stake.
It is people like you who are for the agenda and are trying to slow the exposure of truth, but people like you are failing miserably.
1) And yes, I am attacking you. I don’t care who knows it. If you read my thread and have any background research of your own, you would be able to connect the dots (if you weren’t behind some kind of agenda like coming on here and messing with people’s posts). I can see you are also trying to get a negative reaction from people that are very passionate about their world.
2) You shouldn’t base your world off of what other people believe because 90% of the people were misled. I base mine off of logic and evidence. If a plane can’t fit in the whole of the pentagon, no engines were found and a video of a missile hitting the pentagon exists, hmm.
3) What’s his real name?
4) You are right about if you aren’t there, how could you know what they are talking about. Well people that are there LEAK what they talk about and I think the reputation, history, and networking of the people who attend speaks loudly enough.
Your disinfo = fail

reply to post by SomeCheesyUsername


I listen to Beck on the radio sometimes because they are funny but lately they
are doing this satan voice bit that is real creepy so I wouldnt be surprised if
he was illuminati, I never watch his show, the crying is so fake.

reply to post by illuminatiDpress


Please do tell more about this Satan voice.

He also tries to make light of the Bohemian Grove

Originally posted by newcovenant
reply to post by sdcigarpig

 

Glenn Beck, while many would state he is a fraud has a track record that far exceeds what many others would state. A large percentage of his predictions have come to pass. A man, whose entire show based around research, not reporting the news, so terrified a presidency to the point where they went to war against him. The man has to be doing something right to do that, can surely not be a fraud.

He has no track record at all, I can't remember a single prediction of his on anyone's lips...entire show based on research? Are YOU Glenn Beck using an alias? He is the only one who ever accuses his show of being all about research. Among the rest of the news world his inaccuracy is legendary. A war against him? That has an element of humor in it too. And lastly no he doesn't and yes he can.

All Glenn Beck been able to do from what I can see, is get the already deluded and malleable to follow along but everyone else hating on Israel. If I didn't know better I would say he is working AGAINST Israel since people will transfer their distrust and suspicion of HIM to that country. I already see a big up-tic in antisemitism. You can blame Beck and his rhetoric turning people completely off.

The recession, the fact that the job market was continuing to fall, the points on the debt, the points about the housing market, just to name a few. I am not Glenn Beck, if I was, don't think I would have time to be on this web site, as I would have too much to do in the interim.

glenn beck admitted the crying was fake..
he is I mean was INF0TAINMENT!!!

he said the inescapable end result of conservitvism is communism!
ha ha so much for christian conservatives
that means you are all really godless communists you buggers

and he made predictions usually after the fact as illustrated by his predictions on gold
after it hit 7oo an once, when everyone already knew where it was going...
as were all the prediction listed so far..

ahhh! that is the harm in listening to beck..
you miss the truth from whence it actually comes...

reply to post by SomeCheesyUsername

You claim that peoples lives are at stake, yet provide no proof, or evidence to back up your claim. Ever point you made, a counter point was made that differs from your point of view, and you are upset, cause it proves that just maybe you might be wrong.
There is no absolute proof on either side of the argument, save that which can be shown, and like a judge we must look at each piece and decide if it is correct or incorrect.
Like a disinformation agent, the posting acts like that, while failing to back up the claims with hard evidence, time and time again. As many of us on this board do, we do the research and come up with our own conclusions. The point being the following:
1) Osama Bin Laden, in his own words, took full credit for the attack on 9/11, and other incidents around the world. He did such without being under duress or cohesion. Under those circumstances, it can only be concluded that he is indeed guilty of mass murder and terrorist attacks.
2) If there is a video, then please send the link so it can be reviewed. But then again, is it truth? After all any and all video posted after 9/11 or shortly there after, would be suspect to being fabricated, amazing things what a computer CGI can do. While many would say that the lack of evidence such as a plane wreckage would indicate no such event could happened, the question should be asked, at what temp does it take to vaporize metal and how hot does an explosion of jet fuel get, and go off of those facts. There are so many variables, the question should be asked, such as what type of fuel, the point of explosion, how hot did it get, how fast was it going, at what point does it explode. Course the other little aspect was the taped calls from the different people who were on those planes, panic stricken and begging for help, as well as, stating what all was going on. I guess eye witness accounts from people who are now dead, should play into that.
3) Whose real name?
4) People who leak information, well they should be examined and questioned about their motives. Is it for the public interest, as something really did go wrong, or is it that they seek 15 minutes of fame. Unlike the prior person who put out the pentagon papers, who hid for years, those now days often take credit, and really makes one think, as their motives are suspect at the very beginning.

reply to post by Danbones


infotainmnet has to actual be informative.

Glen Beck is more like DisInfoTainment. Or just disinfo.

reply to post by sdcigarpig



It is far too evident that you have no idea of what you talk. Your rebuttal makes absolutely no sense. There is no logic behind you and you are ignoring the hard evidence that is so easily accessible. You cannot win!

Alex Jones vs. Glen Beck huh?

Is there any chance there will be any proof of anything in this thread or just a bunch of videos about another guys videos?

Originally posted by SomeCheesyUsername
reply to post by sdcigarpig

 

It is far too evident that you have no idea of what you talk. Your rebuttal makes absolutely no sense. There is no logic behind you and you are ignoring the hard evidence that is so easily accessible. You cannot win!

edit on 26-6-2011 by SomeCheesyUsername because: (no reason given)

Ah but the fact that you have attacked someone who does not agree with you, and has point out with common sense shows that I have won. The challenge is simple provide the proof to your statements, the ball is in your court. I have pointed out the arguments, refute them.
Until actual credible facts and proof can be shown, then the argument fails on its own weight without any merits.

reply to post by sdcigarpig


Why don't you show evidence against my evidence. That is the only way to prove I am wrong.

reply to post by SomeCheesyUsername


You have put a lot into your thread. I managed to watch a few of the videos before I got sick to my stomach. I can barely stomach the man. I started watching him a few years ago and watched him progress into a form of insanity. Alex Jones who I have very recently began watching did demonstrate how he was getting his persona from him. Jones said he was an actor which Jones was right. I saw Beck on a program a few years back where he admitted that it was just a show and it was just for the money. which explained why he began to rant more and more on his shows The problem is he not a good actor and definitely isn't good at imitating Alex Jones. Recently Beck simply went over the edge with his stupid rants and a blackboard which made totally no sense. He even became a target of the other MSM and other people on FOX. Not because of his information but the crazy way he was presenting it. In case you didn't notice his programs after it was decided he wasn't going to be on Fox any longer calmed down immensely.