It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

More Dual suns, this time in Siberia!!

page: 2
5
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 24 2011 @ 07:15 AM
link   
reply to post by wingsfan
 


Honestly, I saw it..the insurance commercial had 2 suns..I was considering posting but figured nobody noticed...I am with you 100%...2 suns in the prudential commercial



posted on Jun, 24 2011 @ 07:34 AM
link   
Well...the first half of the video, definitely lens flare like someone mentioned above.
And as for the cloud phenomenon, pretty amazing that it is. But I'm guessing it will be bought down to the fact that its ice crystals in the atmosphere


Thanks for the video op, i hadn't seen it before.



posted on Jun, 24 2011 @ 10:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by boo1981
Well...the first half of the video, definitely lens flare like someone mentioned above.
And as for the cloud phenomenon, pretty amazing that it is. But I'm guessing it will be bought down to the fact that its ice crystals in the atmosphere


Thanks for the video op, i hadn't seen it before.


The first half was not a lens flare at all!! The second half of his video was.

Here is a lens flare:





posted on Jun, 24 2011 @ 11:01 AM
link   
reply to post by spolvil
 



I thought they were typical bright sundogs seen in northern latitudes in winter. I've seen sun dogs like that. Notice how the objects are shown close to the horizon. After the sun rises higher the sun dog would look more typical.



posted on Jun, 25 2011 @ 03:08 AM
link   
As previously stated if there were two suns in the solar system everyone on the planet would see and feel them.



posted on Jun, 25 2011 @ 02:43 PM
link   
reply to post by Mythkiller
 


How can you be on the fence about two suns? Come on be sensible. Go outside and look. I'll wait right here while you do. Do you see one sun out there or two? Exactly ! Ok now that settles it.



posted on Jun, 25 2011 @ 02:46 PM
link   
reply to post by new_here
 


Deal.
As soon as I see something like this I am on it. I will alert the news media too.



posted on Jun, 25 2011 @ 02:56 PM
link   
I know this is a bit Off topic Dont flame me but..

Really who can take someone srsly when they are having fun with their Webcam , look at me im blue and i look like this, no one will know who i am "harr harr harr harr"

For the duel sun thing i'v been photographing the sun in different spots in Sweden all the way to the south and almost all the way to north and i simple cant get this other sun to get on my cam



posted on Jun, 25 2011 @ 03:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by MrGrimm
Poor guy, good thing he used the negative effect in the beginning. It minimizes the shame.


HAHAHA and ROFL, that is just about the funniest think I've read in a while!!!



posted on Jun, 28 2011 @ 01:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by The Asgard
As previously stated if there were two suns in the solar system everyone on the planet would see and feel them.


Except this approaching object, isn't a SUN.

It might appear to many as such and might be described as such due to its luminosity, but only around August/Sept will it become clear and undeniable to EVERYONE.

Of course I will concede there is no empirical "scientific" evidence that this object (some claim is similar to a brown dwarf) would definitely be easily seen (or even disclosed) in the way you're talking about yet. There's too many unknowns to make any accurate assessments at this time in strict known scientific terms not to mention most alternative sources that claim there's evidence (which yes, i do support), will most likely never be accepted or validated by traditional science let alone any officials/governments even if there was due to the implications of what such an object would do which I believe is causing the increased and bizarre weather patterns and may apparently be an almost "terraforming" of the planet beginning between September to November in near conjunction to the passing of ELENIN.

Now I'm sure the usual obfuscation brigade will be along with the predictable ridicule, denials and arguments to perpetuate the cover-up and diversions, but within 2 months, while the media, skeptics and most government controlled scientists will be dismissing this "second sun" with cover stories of a supernova that have already been set up and imprinted, imo its a final sign and chance for the unveiled to move to safezones far from coasts and urban centers.

So the idea of a second sun appearing this year is NOT something based on sci-fi or an anonymous internet doomsday fanatic... in fact, it was actually brought up and discussed by a news source connected to FOX NEWS and as I said, is a cover-story thats already been set up they can use if necessary.







edit on 28-6-2011 by truthseekr1111 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 28 2011 @ 04:22 PM
link   
reply to post by truthseekr1111
 


Where do you get these really bizarre ideas?

Only Moon has an affect on our system and that is on the tides and a few rare types of low intensity earthquakes. Yet here you claim that something outside of the Earth is affecting the weather. That would be the Sun and only the Sun. If there were another source of energy strong enough to affect the weather it would be easily detected by anyone on Earth.

There are alternative sources? Such as what? Please tell us what nonscientific source you refer to.

I would say you are a part of the "obfuscation brigade" since you are telling tall tales with no evidence and claiming that actual hard work and observation cannot discover this fantasy.


So the idea of a second sun appearing this year is NOT something based on sci-fi or an anonymous internet doomsday fanatic... in fact, it was actually brought up and discussed by a news source connected to FOX NEWS and as I said, is a cover-story thats already been set up they can use if necessary.

So where is this object? It's not in the solar system. No one is seeing more than a few beautiful sun dogs which are due to the atmosphere.



posted on Jun, 29 2011 @ 05:12 PM
link   
I can only boggle that this gets serious consideration.

Two suns. And um.. no one really noticed? It would be visible by anyone who could see the sun. Posssibly for weeks on end.. or longer. Like.. REALLY OBVIOUS. Objects that large don't just pop into existance for a guy in Siberia. They move through space, grow larger and become visible, and are seen by a LOT OF PEOPLE.

Heck, people find asteriods MUCH smaller, farther away. And we miss an entire SUN?

I am thinking not. Use some common sense people.



posted on Jun, 29 2011 @ 05:13 PM
link   
Couple things I need to debunk here.

1. The pentagram shape. Dude says its impossible to be a lense flare because the lenses are round, and would make a round flare. WRONG.

If the shutter is partially shut, it would make a flare look like the photo below. BTW, there are 6 sides on your flares, not 5. Again, just like the photo below.




2. The last part of the video shows the sun behind the clouds. The asian people aren't looking at it cause "somethins behind it" theyre looking at it cause the water vapor coming off the clouds with the sun behind it, it creating a rainbow effect. And would be a pretty neat sight to look at.

You're welcom.
edit on 29-6-2011 by BrnBdry because: (no reason given)

edit on 29-6-2011 by BrnBdry because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 29 2011 @ 05:27 PM
link   
reply to post by truthseekr1111
 


I'm with you. Thanks for speaking up.
2nd line.



posted on Jun, 29 2011 @ 05:32 PM
link   
reply to post by Idonthaveabeard
 


In February 2007 this was witnessed in Kazakhstan

video.mail.ru...



posted on Jun, 29 2011 @ 05:40 PM
link   
forgive me for this but....In the last video he shows, in the OP vid, the one from the Philippines, what exactly is so phenomenal? It looks like the Sun behind some clouds. I know Im missing something because you can see all the people taking pictures and what not i just want to know what im missing.



posted on Jun, 29 2011 @ 09:02 PM
link   
One of the things people love to do on Mt Abu in India is to reach out and pretend to hold the setting sun in their fingers. It's a great photo shoot, but it's a matter of perspective and not real. That's the same with these videos. They are pretty, but not what is claimed - evidence of a second sun. What they are evidence for is the simple notion that people will make crazy claims.



posted on Jun, 29 2011 @ 09:15 PM
link   
Everyone knows that there are two suns on Tatooine...ONLY

Actually, looks very much like a mirage in the mist, or clouds. Reflecting the sun.

Wait, that didn't come out right.

Swamp gas was reflecting the light from....Venus.. and..well.

There is NOT a second sun.



posted on Jun, 29 2011 @ 09:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by Egyptia
reply to post by Idonthaveabeard
 


In February 2007 this was witnessed in Kazakhstan

video.mail.ru...


www.atoptics.co.uk...
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/29fe38f504c3.jpg[/atsimg]

A 120° parhelion brightens the parhelic circle. Far from the sun, these parhelia arise from multiple reflections inside relatively thick oriented plate crystals. To the right of the 120° parhelion, the otherwise colourless parhelic circle is very slightly blue ~ the 'blue spot'. Further right around the anthelic point (the point opposite to the sun but at the same altitude), singly oriented columns generate even more exotic halos. HaloSim simulation centered 150° from a 15° high sun.


120° parhelion ray path through a near horizontal plate crystal.
Always look carefully for 120° parhelia whenever the ordinary 22° sundogs are very bright. They are not particularly rare, but when they are diffuse they can sometimes be difficult to distinguish from bright areas of cloud.

The parhelia result from at least two internal reflections. Rays enter the plate crystal top face, internally reflect off two adjacent side faces then leave through the lower face. The horizontal deflection of the ray is always 120° regardless of the angle of incidence of the incoming ray ~ hence the parhelion rather than yet another parhelic circle ray.




top topics



 
5
<< 1   >>

log in

join