It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SFA437
reply to post by Kitilani
No.
They would have secured the scene and one would have headed down to the Magistrate to swear out a warrant for arrest for leaving the scene of an MVA.
Then they would have returned and knocked again. Entering a home for an arrest warrant without an attachment for forced entry is a no-no, so if he refused to answer there is nothing they can legally do.
Depending on the officers on scene, they could have made the case for exigent circumstances in this case (the possibility of subject being injured from the MVA) and they could have forced entry. This has to stand up to judicial review however, and based on the subject's prior actions (running off with a bumper) they'd have been screwed after the fact.
Entry into a residence without a warrant and no justifiable exigent circumstances, as well as forced entry for a property crime, will get any officers involved sued and fired.
In this case I'd assume (I know ASS-U-ME :lol a warrant was sworn out and whatever legal representation the drunk knucklehead had arranged for his surrender. Happens all the time with civilians- nothing out of the ordinary for a simple property crime.
ETA: This is exactly the way it went down: Cop Pleads in Bizarre Crashedit on 5-7-2011 by SFA437 because: (no reason given)
In at least one case where Baker followed a suspected drunken driver to his home, the incident was handled much differently than when he was under investigation. That case, involving a Rock County farmer named Tim Kimmel, eventually resulted in a federal lawsuit being filed against Baker.
The lawsuit, which was eventually dismissed, accused Baker of violating the civil rights of Tim Kimmel’s father, Kim Kimmel, while Baker was a deputy with Rock County. The case had not been resolved before Baker was hired by the city of Mankato.
According to the lawsuit, Baker followed Tim Kimmel home after receiving a report that Kimmel had been driving erratically. He followed Tim Kimmel onto the property of Kim Kimmel’s farm and into Kim Kimmel’s garage.
When Kim Kimmel came out of the house and into the garage, barefoot and wearing only pajamas, he was ordered to the floor of the garage. Kimmel claimed he complied but was hit in the head by Baker’s fist or a police baton. Kimmel said he was handcuffed and Baker’s police dog, Tarzan, was biting him on the neck, head and shoulder when he regained consciousness.
That incident happened on July 14, 2007, and the lawsuit was filed by Kim Kimmel in April 2009. Baker left Rock County after being hired by the Mankato Department of Public Safety in November 2009. The case was settled through a “stipulation for dismissal” that was filed by attorneys for both sides a month after Baker left Rock County. Kimmel’s attorney for the case, Lawrence Crosby, said he couldn’t comment on the terms of the settlement.
Baker’s attorney for the Mankato hit-and-run case, Deborah Ellis of St. Paul, said Baker declined to comment for this story.
“That matter is still under investigation by the department, so he won’t be making any comment,” Ellis said.
Originally posted by Kitilani
Odd that you wrote that then. So you are just posting random nonsense whether you believe it or not?
Originally posted by Kitilani
You expect people to believe that you believe that had that been a civilian, the cops would still have knocked a few times and then just given up?
Originally posted by Kitilani
That sure is a lot of shoulda woulda coulda. How familiar are you with "didna."
Originally posted by Kitilani
No, that does not happen all the time. Do you know how alcohol works? The only reason cops let a suspected drunk driver turn himself in later is to purposely give him time to not blow over the limit. Just like this cop here could no so easily fight just how bad his drunk driving accident was since there is no proof he was drunk.
Originally posted by Kitilani
Just ask this hero of the people you are trying to make look good here.
In at least one case where Baker followed a suspected drunken driver to his home, the incident was handled much differently than when he was under investigation. That case, involving a Rock County farmer named Tim Kimmel, eventually resulted in a federal lawsuit being filed against Baker.
The lawsuit, which was eventually dismissed, accused Baker of violating the civil rights of Tim Kimmel’s father, Kim Kimmel, while Baker was a deputy with Rock County. The case had not been resolved before Baker was hired by the city of Mankato.
According to the lawsuit, Baker followed Tim Kimmel home after receiving a report that Kimmel had been driving erratically. He followed Tim Kimmel onto the property of Kim Kimmel’s farm and into Kim Kimmel’s garage.
When Kim Kimmel came out of the house and into the garage, barefoot and wearing only pajamas, he was ordered to the floor of the garage. Kimmel claimed he complied but was hit in the head by Baker’s fist or a police baton. Kimmel said he was handcuffed and Baker’s police dog, Tarzan, was biting him on the neck, head and shoulder when he regained consciousness.
When a civilian is suspected of driving drunk, this same cop follows him home and beats him in his own garage.
You were saying.
That incident happened on July 14, 2007, and the lawsuit was filed by Kim Kimmel in April 2009. Baker left Rock County after being hired by the Mankato Department of Public Safety in November 2009. The case was settled through a “stipulation for dismissal” that was filed by attorneys for both sides a month after Baker left Rock County. Kimmel’s attorney for the case, Lawrence Crosby, said he couldn’t comment on the terms of the settlement.
Baker’s attorney for the Mankato hit-and-run case, Deborah Ellis of St. Paul, said Baker declined to comment for this story.
“That matter is still under investigation by the department, so he won’t be making any comment,” Ellis said.
Originally posted by Kitilani
Thank you for giving me a link to a story about what a complete scumbag this drunk driving cop is and for linking me to a story that blasts your defense of this man right out of the water.edit on 5-7-2011 by Kitilani because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SFA437
Why is it odd I responded to a direct question directed at me by you?
Originally posted by Kitilani
Originally posted by SFA437
Why is it odd I responded to a direct question directed at me by you?
I never suggested it was odd that you responded.
It was how you responded.
Try again. Read my post this time as your response will be far more fruitful.
Originally posted by Kitilani
reply to post by SFA437
You expect people to believe that you believe that had that been a civilian, the cops would still have knocked a few times and then just given up?
Originally posted by SFA437
Originally posted by AGWskeptic
I was the detox charge nurse on the 11pm to 7am shift in Mankato for 3 years. I could give you dozens of examples where the police did just that, and never got in any trouble.
Please do. I prefer case numbers so they can be verified however dates will suffice.
I'll be waiting.
Originally posted by AGWskeptic
If you have a half a brain you know that could mean the loss of my nursing license, so I'll assume you are not a total retard and were joking.
Originally posted by Kitilani
reply to post by SFA437
Because I asked you about something you said. You then went on to say "no" and explain why you now believe the exact opposite of what you said. If you did not believe it, I am confused as to why you said it.
I am not going to file a complaint,
Originally posted by MikeNice81
. . .
told me that refusing to consent to a search constituted probable cause. He then said that he was going to search my whole car.
. . .
Originally posted by unityemissions
The thread title is a lie, the woman repeatedly lied in the video, and the cops were being civil and humane.
You guys are really trying to poo poo the cops in this thread.
I'm all for calling out police brutality and whatnot, but this isn't a case I'd stand up for.
Originally posted by MikeNice81
Then don't complain about cops that you feel are abusing power. The department can't do anything about the problem untill they are made aware. If citizens would stop sitting around complaining to people that can't help them they might get some where. There is a process for filing a complaint. If you want change make change.