It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by PsykoOps
reply to post by Xcathdra
I never said that. Whatever.
Originally posted by Xcathdra
reply to post by The_Phantom
Ya know what.. since you and oth4ers like to stereotype and insult me and recently receving a U2U that contained a threat, I think I will insult people who have no fricking clue as to whats going on. You guys are all over the place, and you refuse to follow anything but your opinion, subsituting it for law.
You guys ignore any law you fell is wrong, regardless of the fact whether you even understand ther law or not.
The charges were dismissed
The Cop did not violate the law, either Local state or FEderal
This lady has a history of baiting / behavior in order to force an encounter.
and even after all of that, you guys still come back with idiotic comments / situations that have nothing to do with whats going on, like equating an AR-15 on the trunk of a police car and saying thats why people hate the cops.
Or Spy who likes to make comments and accusations yet refuses to provide any sources to support his claims while he klings to whatever argument seems to be going on at the moment. Or Gps777 who is so lost when it comes to law and procedure its not even funny.
IF you guys want to hold the Police responsible thats fine.. However, you should learn what the laws are and how they work before opening your mouths.
Im not sure whats more ebarrasing.. Leaving an AR-15 on the trunk of a patrol car, or being ignorant on how laws and your civil rights work while reinforcing the fact the majorty of people in these types of threads dont even know how the government works.
I guess obfuscation is the choice defense by peolpe in these threads who make accusations they cant back up - Spy66 / Gps777 your at the top of that list. I am still waiting for you to provide sources t support your claims. Or would it be easier to jsut acknowledge you made the info up and that you have no sources to support your claims?
Originally posted by The_Phantom
When have I insulted you?
Originally posted by The_Phantom
The only thing I have ever done in relation to you is make an accurate prediction of your behavior pattern. I did it in a calm way though, you on the other hand have called me a troll, a cry baby, ignorant and a donkey (but you used a naughty word, lulz) not to mention that in almost every single one of your posts you call people ignorant and stupid.
Originally posted by The_Phantom
But you claim that I and others insult you? You are the victim of personal attacks? So one person did something to you, and everybody else has to pay the price and get insulted, that's the way it works?
Originally posted by The_Phantom
That's exactly the police mentality that everybody is talking about.
Originally posted by The_Phantom
One person is a criminal so all must be treated like criminals. One person attacks a cop, all people must be treated as if they had or will.
Originally posted by The_Phantom
Again I repeat, we know how our government works, we simply don't like it. It is every bit as good of an opinion as the individuals that created the laws with their opinions that you believe in so strongly.
So what you are saying then is you are above the law and answerable to no other authority but God? If thats the case, then why should people agree with your view on the laws in question you dont like? Are you somehow superior to everyone else in the sense no one can tell you what to do, but you can tell others what to do?
Originally posted by The_Phantom
My rights were given to me by God, therefore no man is above me so that he may establish law over me.
Originally posted by The_Phantom
I do not consent to give my rights and my liberty away in exchange for security. There is one law in America, the Constitution.
Originally posted by The_Phantom
Everything else blows in the wind and is up for grabs. The opinions that you see are in an attempt to spread that message and change what is in the present, your job is clearly to keep the status quo, or even up the ante.
Originally posted by The_Phantom
I and the others that have joined this site are here because we don't trust the government and don't wish to be told what to do. And so over and over we will explain to each person that enters the forum that you can list all of the laws you want until the cows come home and your face turns blue. Right is right and wrong is wrong, and we will take as many insults from you as needed in the process of doing so.
Originally posted by The_Phantom
The cop was wrong to arrest her.
Originally posted by The_Phantom
"In a state where corruption abounds, laws must be very numerous." -Tacitus
Originally posted by The_Phantom
Have a nice day.edit on 29-6-2011 by The_Phantom because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Xcathdra
Ya know what.. since you and oth4ers like to stereotype and insult me and recently receving a U2U that contained a threat, I think I will insult people who have no fricking clue as to whats going on. You guys are all over the place, and you refuse to follow anything but your opinion, subsituting it for law.
Or Gps777 who is so lost when it comes to law and procedure its not even funny.
Originally posted by gps777
I think I understand it clearly enough,the law in the US for a LEO is if he gives a command it is therefore lawful,whether or not its seen as a criminal offense by a judge is beside the point.Is that about right,in a nut shell?
Originally posted by Xcathdra
Yes and no, and I answer that way based off examples others have given. In the op article, I feel the cop was within his autority to tell her to move away. We dont need to rehash that argument, since we both know where we stand on it. If an officer tells you to strip down and run around naked on the highway, then no, its not a lawful command.
Or Gps777 who is so lost when it comes to law and procedure its not even funny.
I guess obfuscation is the choice defense by peolpe in these threads who make accusations they cant back up - Spy66 / Gps777 your at the top of that list.
Originally posted by The_Phantom
Maybe you can help me out, when have I insulted you?
Originally posted by The_Phantom
Like when you call people stupid, or you called me a "donkey"?
Originally posted by The_Phantom
When that happens there is usually a history of reasons for those assertions to exist.
Originally posted by The_Phantom
When did I say all cops are bad? As I said before I recently posted about a cop that was killed searching for truth and I'm not sure a cop has even posted on that thread. I said this individual cop was wrong, but it sounds like you are making broad sweeping allegations against the "ignorant" people on this forum.
Originally posted by The_Phantom
When that happens there is usually a history of reasons for those assertions to exist.
Originally posted by The_Phantom
Incorrect, I have never hurt anybody in my life, why? It's not because of law, but because I believe it is wrong to do so. I believe law is a opinion, but I agree with some of those opinions such as not hurting or stealing from your fellow man. It was said in relation to religion but the principle applies to all things. “But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods, or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg." -Jefferson The point is that if somebody does something and it doesn't hurt me or take from me then who cares what they are doing. Many of the little rules that police enforce go well beyond that basic principle. On the other hand the police do hurt people and they do take money from people, so I find that interesting.
Originally posted by The_Phantom
I'm saying that I'm an American, and as one that gives me the right to challenge laws that other men try to put in place over me, yes. You better believe that real Americans know that they have the right to have the laws they don't like changed.
Originally posted by The_Phantom
If you don't want to play under all of the other laws that's fine with me...in that case you would see what would happen when police start doing that without the "laws" that they created to protect them don't exist. Without those rules nobody would accept your authority because the police aren't part of the Constitution. Without those laws that you love so much, people would just say, the military is kidnapping people in the country and I think you know what comes next. I'm not advocating that type of behavior, I'm just saying things wouldn't go as you suggest.
Originally posted by The_Phantom
We do live in a Constitutional Republic, but it is also Republic through democracy (lowercase) also making it a Democratic Republic, meaning that when the people don't like something they make it know, and demand change.
Originally posted by The_Phantom
I think their is a word in the conspiracy world when somebody that works for the government defends the government point of view all of the time while claiming that nobody else knows what they are talking about...hmmm, what is that word?
Originally posted by The_Phantom
...That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed...That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to ALTER or to abolish it
Originally posted by The_Phantom
Who decides when it has become destructive? The people, its based on public perception, that's the real reason for our debate, you want public perception to be one thing, I wish for it to be another. But as an American, yes I have the right to demand that laws I don't like are altered or removed completely. I don't give my consent, so I give my opinion to have those things changed. With enough people in agreement they can be.
Originally posted by The_Phantom
Tell it to the Judge
Alright, time to get my day started.edit on 29-6-2011 by The_Phantom because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ..5..
reply to post by Xcathdra
You have posted more than anyone else.
Are you really that insecure that you always have to feel you are in control? By having the last word on 'everything'?
A forum is a place to share ideas not be browbeaten by some closed minded individual with a God complex.
People are allowed to have viewpoints that are 'different' from your own. It is called an opinion and everyone has a right to have a different one.
Originally posted by The_Phantom
The point is that if somebody does something and it doesn't hurt me or take from me then who cares what they are doing. Many of the little rules that police enforce go well beyond that basic principle.
Originally posted by SFA437 The goal of a peace officer should be to interfere as little as possible in the lives of those who he is sworn to protect. That protection includes financial harm such as burglary and robbery but also in my mind financial harm from nonsensical citations for violations of the VTL and civil offenses which the town/city may put in place that harm nobody.
Originally posted by Xcathdra
Originally posted by PsykoOps
reply to post by Xcathdra
I never said that. Whatever.
Then what exactly is the point of posting that info in this thread if your intent was not to make a blanket statement / insinuation that because the cops left an AR on the trunk, all cops do it.
Originally posted by PsykoOps
*snip*
It's not police afaik? They are workers at a court house who have arrested someone. They claim that it is a federal law that you cant film them but when asked to produce that law they refuse saying they dont have to show anything.
Originally posted by gps777
. . .
May contain graphic images of the assault and bubbly kind.
Originally posted by anon72
A woman was arrested for videotaping police from her front yard in Rochester, New York
The woman, who is unidentified at this point, was recording a traffic stop where police had a man handcuffed on May 12th. The video was uploaded to Blip TV today. The cops noticed her recording and started hassling her with absurd notions. “I don’t feel safe with you standing behind me, so I’m going to ask you to go into your house,” the cop said. “You seem very anti-police … due to what you said to me before you started taping me.”She was charged with obstructing government administration.
She ended up getting handcuffed and taken away after she refused to walk into her house, even though she was clearly on her own property. Meanwhile, the man they had originally handcuffed was released
Source: www.pixiq.com...
What the hell is our country come to? Honestly? You can't videotape a police officer doing his job from your own front yard? WHY?
If you look at all of the stories about similar incidents you should see am alarming pattern emerging. YOU DON'T HAVE PERSONAL RIGHTS anymore-when a cop decides you don't just because you are video taping.
We have to get a grip on this as a country. The SCOTUS needs to hear a case and make a decision on this. Our country is officially in the toliet, IMO.
This cop was totally in the wrong. Notice how he stopped paying attention to the traffic stop activity to focus on a citizen holding a camera. There were at least 3 police officers there and no mobs/riots etc. That cop decided to violate the citizens rights purely on COP EGOMANIA and/or oppression. I hope she enjoys her money that she will be getting from the city.
edit on 6/22/2011 by anon72 because: (no reason given)edit on 6/22/2011 by anon72 because: (no reason given)