It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Juanxlink
Originally posted by SkepticAndBeliever
Originally posted by Juanxlink
No refutation needed for some fantasy facts, let us know when the guy gets an engineering degree. To add, why dont the OP try to explain the cutted-melted core columns? That must be a result of the pancaking too right?
I already provided a video explaining this too, please pay attention.
www.youtube.com...
Would you mind bringing some FACTS? Not "we dont know if they were cutted during the rubble removal works", if you consider that an answer, well then I can see why you took the OS hook line and sinker...
ATS motto should be changed "Ignorance Is Bliss".
Originally posted by liejunkie01
Originally posted by dadgad
Originally posted by liejunkie01
reply to post by dadgad
Actually they were. Stop making things up.
Link please.
Show me where it says that the floors were made to support the upper floors downward force.
Again if you would read a little, instead of watching someone's made up youtube vids you might learn something.
You show me links instead.
As said above. The weight did not at all provide the kinetic energy you are fantasizing about.
Furthermore, even if the fires weakened the trusses and caused a collapse (of that particular story), the collapse would have been stopped by the other floors because those trusses were not exposed to any significant heat. Neither would there have been enough kinetic energy to support your claim since this entire scenario (science-fiction) took place at the top of the building.
You have shown no facts to back up your claims.
I use wiki sometimes because the info is there and it is quick. I read it before I used it. The information is all there.
Why are you dodging my question from before. I would like to see some actual proof of what you say is true. I see nothing that you have contributed to be of any factual evidence.
At least I use wiki.
Again you are talking in circles. The lower floors were not designed to handle the downward stresses of the falling floors above. That is not how the buildings are designed.
This is really my last post to you.edit on 18-6-2011 by liejunkie01 because: spelling, sorry
Originally posted by dadgad
Originally posted by liejunkie01
Originally posted by dadgad
Originally posted by liejunkie01
reply to post by dadgad
Actually they were. Stop making things up.
Link please.
Show me where it says that the floors were made to support the upper floors downward force.
Again if you would read a little, instead of watching someone's made up youtube vids you might learn something.
You show me links instead.
As said above. The weight did not at all provide the kinetic energy you are fantasizing about.
Furthermore, even if the fires weakened the trusses and caused a collapse (of that particular story), the collapse would have been stopped by the other floors because those trusses were not exposed to any significant heat. Neither would there have been enough kinetic energy to support your claim since this entire scenario (science-fiction) took place at the top of the building.
You have shown no facts to back up your claims.
I use wiki sometimes because the info is there and it is quick. I read it before I used it. The information is all there.
Why are you dodging my question from before. I would like to see some actual proof of what you say is true. I see nothing that you have contributed to be of any factual evidence.
At least I use wiki.
Again you are talking in circles. The lower floors were not designed to handle the downward stresses of the falling floors above. That is not how the buildings are designed.
This is really my last post to you.edit on 18-6-2011 by liejunkie01 because: spelling, sorry
They where not designed? Any building is, by nature. That is why buildings dont suddenly collapse and that is why steel structures can burn violently for days without ever collapsing. That is why bombs can go of without it collapsing (oklahoma)
Stop fantasizing. This happened because the columns where carefully cut.
And even if your fantasy scenario would have taken place, the speed of the collapse could not have been free fall acceleration, you see, because the collapsing stories would interact with other stories, slowing them down.
Besides, where is all the steel, if this was kinetic energy at work, what happened to the steel? It just folded up?
That's funny, because all the respected scientists and physics experts agree with the updated NIST Report (unbiased). Obviously truth scholars are biased trying to press what they believe is the truth while ignoring proof. I guess you fail to recognize that...and "dis-info agent" REALLY? I'm just a person with a computer not part of any 911 cover up operation I swear you have no logic and are severely mentally impaired if you honestly believe that.
The top fifteen floors, even if they were in free fall, would not weigh enough to let the remaining floors fall with such velocity, giving no resistance.
Originally posted by jimnuggits
Apparently, no one on the side of the 9/11 pancake collapse side wants to argue with me directly, so will
someone else please ask them how they account for the speed at which the top fifteen floors fell, without so
much as a modicum of resistance from the eighty floors beneath them?
And where did the steel core columns go, if they were sheered away from the falling floors?
Originally posted by Averysmallfoxx
reply to post by SkepticAndBeliever
Umm no, it doesn't, what lead to structural integrity being lost huh? If I have to point stuff out your not going to get it all nice and neat. I'm not your mom and I wont hold your hand through your confusion. If you want to insist that the towers dropped because of the fire, explain the unit underneath the first plane that connected with WTC, it is NOT standard on any commercial jet, ESPECIALLY on passenger airliners.
see the similarity?
But let me find a better pic of the pod on the plane in question, you might find the article attached to the photos informative too...Stop being so crass.
Pod attached to impacting plane
Lets no kid ourselves,we are mislead, this right now seems the only thing that's obvious!edit on 18-6-2011 by Averysmallfoxx because: fixed link
Originally posted by liejunkie01
I am looking for how much they weighed........ Can you provide a link for this?
I would like to see some math.
Forgive me if I do not take your word for it........The truthers have taken over any information regarding 9/11.