It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MasterAndrew
you are deluded. ever heard of physics. Look it up.
No offense but if you continue to think the weren't demolished. It just proves they could rely on how gullible people like you are.
Originally posted by MasterAndrew
you are deluded. ever heard of physics. Look it up.
No offense but if you continue to think the weren't demolished. It just proves they could rely on how gullible people like you are.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
Explain Bldg 7. That is the start, middle and end of the debate. If that ONE building can be explained by natural forces and occurrence through the events of that morning, then all the theories fall apart. If however, it cannot be explained as a cause/effect of two planes hitting Bldg 1 and 2, then it's all a load of crap. It's really that simple and that cut and dry.
So..... Explain Bldg 7.
Originally posted by Buford2
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
Building Seven was brought down by Alien forces. Makes as much sense as the BS MSM is telling us. BTW I remember the buildings turning into dust right before our eyes. No one saw metal collapsing. I am not sure why people keep talking about a sandwich effect. A sandwich effect would not turn metal into dust.edit on 18-6-2011 by Buford2 because: (no reason given)
You need to see the pictures of columns cut on an angle from ground zero the twin towers were demolished
Originally posted by ANOK
You are not taking into account the laws of motion that govern all objects in movement and what happens to them when subjected to other forces.