It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
There is no antichrist in Revelation. The Beast the image and the false Prophet.
Why would Jesus destroy the Antichrist if he hasn't reigned yet.
Paul makes illusions to Old Testament references that speak as if there was a man who would fill these roles that would usher in the end of the world.
I doubt this man of sin can live for thousands of years. Jesus called him the Abomination of desolation.
You have not posted a single scripture to explain why Jesus said everything in Matthew 24:4-28 has to happen before he can come back. And you know what, i'm about to post the whole thing.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by HolyandClean
Paul makes illusions to Old Testament references that speak as if there was a man who would fill these roles that would usher in the end of the world.
I doubt this man of sin can live for thousands of years. Jesus called him the Abomination of desolation.
Back in the Old Testament, they did not have a whole theology built around the concept of a Satan.
Paul does not want to appear to be contradicting the older scripture so he defines this person in terms so that the reader would immediately draw the conclusion that he clearly meant Satan.
They represent systems made up of individual people, who are mortal. Satan is naturally immortal and requires a bit more killing, except my explanation sort of buys into your timeline, which I do not accept.
Then why is the beast and false prophet thrown into the lake of fire at His 2nd coming yet satan isn't cast there until 1,000 years later?
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by jmdewey60
Well, the beast isn't satan. Satan indwells the beast for a time as he did with Judas. The beast and his false prophet are cast into the lake of fire 1,000 years before satan is cast there.
Looking for a future individual human being to be the antichrist is disinformation and misdirection.
So?
No, the times that the term "THE" antichrist appears is "ho anticristos" in the Greek. The definite article "ho" (The) in Greek signifies a specific one. It's a minor thing in the English, Greek is fundamentally different with the usage of definite articles.
The opposite of the Son of God, or the "anti", is the Son of Perdition, meaning Satan.
Originally posted by HolyandClean
reply to post by NOTurTypical
If you don't have any scriptures, you have no reason to be here, understand? I DON'T CARE ABOUT YOUR OPINION. Haven't I made that clear yet?
Matthew 24:1-4
King James Version (KJV)
1And Jesus went out, and departed from the temple: and his disciples came to him for to shew him the buildings of the temple.
2And Jesus said unto them, See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down.
3And as he sat upon the mount of Olives, the disciples came unto him privately, saying, Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world?
4And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you.
I bolded it where they asked about the end of the world, and Jesus's 2nd coming. You have to be blind not to see it. If you cannot disprove every scripture I just posted, then you have no reason to be here.