2 more SuperVolcs added today 1th June

Campi Flegrei update 23rd June

Two more EQ's 6.0 @40km 23.00utc and 5.5 @35KM 10.30utc

What's worrying is the depth...too consistent.
Also Etna is showing all signs of blowing.

Rainbows
Jane

reply to post by angelchemuel


I can not seem to find this Mag 6 quake on any other RELIABLE Earthquake monitoring site.
As for the depths, we need to start worrying more when they start to be below 10km deep. Then if it starts to get shallower and more frequent.
This then indicates that magma is moving to the surface and we COULD see an eruption. From what I have seen over the years on RSOE there has been the odd quake at these Super volcanoes and we are all still here and no kind of eruption has occurred.

Also as other members have pointed out, RSOE do not state if the quakes are magma-tic or tectonic.

Thanks

Campi Flegrei update 23rd June

Two more EQ's 6.0 @40km 23.00utc and 5.5 @35KM 10.30utc

hisz.rsoe.hu...

What's worrying is the depth...too consistent.
Also Etna is showing all signs of blowing.

Rainbows
Jane

Campi Flegrei update 25th June

hisz.rsoe.hu...

Campi Flegrei, 4.8 @ 62km

Rainbows
Jane

Campi Flegrei update 26th June

Here's another one 4.7 @ 60km

Greece still rattling but seem to be increasing in velocity slowly.

Rainbows

Jane

Lake Taupo update 27th June

Lake Taupo 2.2 @ 1km

hisz.rsoe.hu...

Rainbows
Jane

Whakamaru update 27th June

Whakamaru 2.2 @1km

hisz.rsoe.hu...

Rainbows
Jane

Raparoa Caldera update 27th June

Raparoa Caldera 2.2 @ 1km

hisz.rsoe.hu...

I suspect the above 3 are linked somehow, or reacting to another EQ in the region.

Rainows
Jane

Long Valley Caldera update 27th June

Long Valley Caldera 2.2 @4.2km

hisz.rsoe.hu...

Rainbows
Jane

Campei Flegrei update 27th June

Campei Flegrei, itssy bittsy 1.9 @ 20km

hisz.rsoe.hu...

Rainbows
Jane

Long Valley Caldera 2 updates 27th & 28th June

Long Valley Caldera 27th 2.1 @ 0.20km

Long Valley Caldera 28th 2.1 @ 0.00km

hisz.rsoe.hu...

Rainbows
Jane

Kikai Caldera update 28th June

Kikai Caldera 4.6 @ 51km

Although Edis date is May...could be a typo as they have put it up today with todays date

hisz.rsoe.hu...

Rainbows
Jane

Campi Flegrei update 28th June

Campi Flegrei 5.0 @ 10km

hisz.rsoe.hu...

Rainbows
jane

Originally posted by angelchemuel

Kikai Caldera update 28th June

Kikai Caldera 4.6 @ 51km

Although Edis date is May...could be a typo as they have put it up today with todays date

hisz.rsoe.hu...

Rainbows
Jane

Kikai caldera correction

My bad....as is todays term!....sorry guys

I don't see why it's necessary to post an update for every quake on the list, as it's getting pretty close to spam. For example, the recent quake at Taupo, Reporoa and Whakamaru calderas were all the same tiny quake with an epicentre well away from the calderas themselves. The quake was centred around Rotorua, and would not even have made local news there.

I can't find reliable information on many of the other quakes, but it is quite possible that they are not related to the super volcanoes that they report on if it happens with the ones here in NZ. Can we verify whether they are actually located close to the volcanoes? Otherwise the updates are inane and not worth reporting as relevant to the volcanoes themselves.

Originally posted by Curious and Concerned
I don't see why it's necessary to post an update for every quake on the list, as it's getting pretty close to spam. For example, the recent quake at Taupo, Reporoa and Whakamaru calderas were all the same tiny quake with an epicentre well away from the calderas themselves. The quake was centred around Rotorua, and would not even have made local news there.

I can't find reliable information on many of the other quakes, but it is quite possible that they are not related to the super volcanoes that they report on if it happens with the ones here in NZ. Can we verify whether they are actually located close to the volcanoes? Otherwise the updates are inane and not worth reporting as relevant to the volcanoes themselves.

You have obviously whizzed through the headlines and not bothered to read the single sentence I wrote which says what took you a whole paragraph to do.

Rainbows
Jane

Originally posted by angelchemuel
You have obviously whizzed through the headlines and not bothered to read the single sentence I wrote which says what took you a whole paragraph to do.

Rainbows
Jane

Rainbows to you too.
Sorry, I don't like making short posts which lack substance. It took me a paragraph to explain what I knew from my own research and basic knowledge. I checked myself and found the quake here, hence I wrote what I found and why it has no relevance to the "super volcanoes" in the updates. The quake was very close, or within the caldera which is Lake Rotorua, but not Reporoa, Whakamaru or Taupo.

But you seem to have missed (or not bothered to read) my question on whether the quakes you are updating have any relevance to the "super volcano" that they are being attributed to. I have shown that the quakes in the updates for the New Zealand volcanoes are not related at all to the volcanoes themselves. So do you know how relevant the others are to their respective volcanoes?

reply to post by Curious and Concerned


I will have to agree with you. As this thread can be misleading and cause in my opinion worry to some new members or even members that have no knowledge of quake/volcanic activity. For example: If i was a member that did not have a clue about Earthquakes then this thread would scary the hell out of me.

OP you can not seem to back up your information with facts such as, are these quakes magmatic or tectonic? As we all know there are most of the time harmonic tremors that increase in size and move closer to the surface. Also we will have other signs of volcanic awakening.

As I have said in previous posts, some of the quakes you are listing do not show up on reliables quake data sites.

A question to you op, have you done research on all the "super volcanoes" you have listed here in your thread?

Thanks

Originally posted by Curious and Concerned

Originally posted by angelchemuel
You have obviously whizzed through the headlines and not bothered to read the single sentence I wrote which says what took you a whole paragraph to do.

Rainbows
Jane

Rainbows to you too.
Sorry, I don't like making short posts which lack substance. It took me a paragraph to explain what I knew from my own research and basic knowledge. I checked myself and found the quake here, hence I wrote what I found and why it has no relevance to the "super volcanoes" in the updates. The quake was very close, or within the caldera which is Lake Rotorua, but not Reporoa, Whakamaru or Taupo.



But you seem to have missed (or not bothered to read) my question on whether the quakes you are updating have any relevance to the "super volcano" that they are being attributed to. I have shown that the quakes in the updates for the New Zealand volcanoes are not related at all to the volcanoes themselves. So do you know how relevant the others are to their respective volcanoes?

I have been away for a few days so please forgive my delay in getting back to you.
Will this do?

Risk factors: The dynamism between the Pacific Plate and the Australian plate is growing. There are many visible signs of this including increased seismic tension along the Alpine Fault, the transform boundary that runs through New Zealand’s South Island. The dynamism from the subduction of the Pacific Plate below the Australian Plate will also ignite more activity in the volcanic arcs of Tonga and Kermadec. Escalating activity in this turbulent underwater volcanic valley is our first indication that dangers are increasing for New Zealand- volcanic and seismic risks for the North Island and shallow seismic quake risks for the South Island. Yesterday’s three earthquakes a 4.8, a 5.1 and a 5.5 in Tonga are an indication of the morphing progression of this geologic catastrophism that is gradually altering the face of the region. -The Extinction Protocol

I am also checking out some other GEOLOGICAL/SEISMIC sites/forums run by seismologists and volcanologists to see if they have any updates. I will get back to you.

Rainbows
Jane

Originally posted by boo1981
reply to post by Curious and Concerned

 

I will have to agree with you. As this thread can be misleading and cause in my opinion worry to some new members or even members that have no knowledge of quake/volcanic activity. For example: If i was a member that did not have a clue about Earthquakes then this thread would scary the hell out of me.

OP you can not seem to back up your information with facts such as, are these quakes magmatic or tectonic? As we all know there are most of the time harmonic tremors that increase in size and move closer to the surface. Also we will have other signs of volcanic awakening.

As I have said in previous posts, some of the quakes you are listing do not show up on reliables quake data sites.

A question to you op, have you done research on all the "super volcanoes" you have listed here in your thread?

Thanks

Sorry to be brief at the moment, but please see posting above, thanks

Rainbows
Jane