Foreskin Man Outrages Jewish Community

Originally posted by Maslo
this sexual stamina thing is just an adverse effect of lower sensitivity, it is not a positive.

I can assure you its positive.

Originally posted by lucid eyes
Being cut carries a number of health benefits as well as other benefits (sexual stamina being one of them). Circumcision is doing a child a great favour.

We wont let ourselves be intimidated by liberals who want to outlaw everything they dont understand or that is remotely connected to religion.

Lmao, this thread is priceless.

Like the last circumcision thread we had. Full of absolutely wild benefits like the above. "Sexual Stamina" !

So far we have:

Circumcision,

. Prevents penis cancer.
. Looks sleek for the ladies.
. Provides sexual stamina.
. Prevents infections and disease.

I would have to wonder why we don't hear about the growing number of cases of penis cancer, and sexually impotent guys with ugly looking willies covered in cauliflowers, so much more...

I'm glad I was left alone. Face it, you guys who are cut just have no idea and are saying anything just to make it sound like you were given a blessing at birth.

lol

reply to post by lucid eyes


I see. I have to admit, I have never heard of that before. PLease, is there any reference material that I may read? I am not thinking of having it done, as I am quite satisfied with what I have now and at 50, I may be a little old for chopping.

As for stamina itself, you can train yourself without chopping your John Thomas. For further info, please U2U me for a great ebook on the subject. (if this violates T&Cs, please remove this section of text).

Originally posted by lucid eyes

Originally posted by Maslo
this sexual stamina thing is just an adverse effect of lower sensitivity, it is not a positive.

I can assure you its positive.

That is just your opinion, plenty of people would consider lower sensitivity to be a negative, myself included. Let the child decide for himself.

Originally posted by TheLoneArcher
reply to post by lucid eyes

 

I see. I have to admit, I have never heard of that before. PLease, is there any reference material that I may read? I am not thinking of having it done, as I am quite satisfied with what I have now and at 50, I may be a little old for chopping.

As for stamina itself, you can train yourself without chopping your John Thomas. For further info, please U2U me for a great ebook on the subject. (if this violates T&Cs, please remove this section of text).

I dont know of any reference material. I do know that people who are cut normally dont complain about it, they are grateful for it. We shouldnt start outlawing stuff that carries no disadvantages.

But I welcome any e-book link you wish to send me on stamina.

Originally posted by Maslo
That is just your opinion, plenty of people would consider lower sensitivity to be a negative, myself included. Let the child decide for himself.

Sensitivity is not lowered that much. If you think its lowered to a point where you cant enjoy sex, the issues lie elsewhere, not in the skin.

Reply to post by Maslo

Lower sensitivity is a negative for sure.

There are plenty of other ways to increase stamina without resorting to mutilation.


Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com

reply to post by lucid eyes


"A liberal thing"???

That's an odd thing to say. How do you figure that?

Tell me, does this man deserve to be killed, or hired to circumcise your little jewish child?

I for one, would kill this man.

I could start a religion within a day and make it require you to chop off your future newborn child's pinky fingers. Imagine how many years you would get in jail for performing such act, so what is the difference between that and circumcision again?

reply to post by MIDNIGHTSUN


OK....here's my take. If it's your religion, then I don't have a problem with it....though to be fair I think you should have it done as an adult rather than as a baby. It would certainly be more intense declaration of your Faith....but that'll likely never happen, so it's beside the point. My problem is circumcisions being done on NON-Jewish kids....I mean I'm cut, and I was not raised Jewish. MOST males in US culture are cut....WHY? I've never understood that. We don't cut off women's breasts when they first form simply because they may develop breast cancer....yet breast cancer is FAR more likely than cancer of the foreskin....there simply seems to be no real rational reason behind cutting a kid if they aren't Jewish.....

Oh but as far as that cartoon went....it was OBVIOUSLY Antisemitic, and I found it fairly reprehensible.

My son is 23 and intact, he has not had any problems. The" look the same in the locker room reason" is the worst to me, how shallow and weak minded does someone have to be to mutilate their child so he will look like the others. I don't understand that, what has happened to parents making sure their child has good self esteem, that would make them proud to be their self.

You guys have to realise that the USA is one of the only countries where it is considered normal for people to be circumcised for non religious reasons. The benefits of circumcision simply do not exist, it is a religious sacrifice for the Jews and I believe Jewish influence in America is the reason for its prevalence. I am not circumcised and neither are most people I know. The foreskin is completely retractable so I simply pull it back when needed, instead of cutting it of completely for reasons either unknown or simply not questioned.

reply to post by MIDNIGHTSUN


Oh God, here we go again with the foreskin thing. There have been many threads on ATS about this issue, and NOTHING ever gets resolved because circumcision in the US is so deeply-entrenched in the population's psyche that it will never be seen as anything other than normal.

Americans have been brain-washed into thinking that Mother Nature somehow got it wrong - that foreskins cause cancer, that foreskins reduce sexual pleasure, that foreskins are unhygienic. No matter how much evidence they are presented with that indicates the contrary, they still refuse to accept that foreskins are there for a purpose.

Also, there's a real male pride issue here too. Most American babies are mutilated in this way simply because daddy was and so was grandpa. It's a way of making the child feel closer to Dad. It's a fact that single mothers circumcise their kids a lot less, because there's no pressure from the father.

Anyway, that's my two cents worth. Nothing anyone says will stop this cruel practice as long as Americans have their collective heads shoved up their behinds.

Originally posted by moonshinegrrl
My son is 23 and intact, he has not had any problems. The" look the same in the locker room reason" is the worst to me, how shallow and weak minded does someone have to be to mutilate their child so he will look like the others. I don't understand that, what has happened to parents making sure their child has good self esteem, that would make them proud to be their self.

You should be proud of yourself for not conforming like all the other sheeple. You've left your son as nature intended and he still appears to be cancer-free and not shunned by society. As such, he's a living, breathing advertisement for good health, and a poke in the eye to all the other misinformed, razor-wielding baby-butchers.

Originally posted by badw0lf

Originally posted by lucid eyes
Being cut carries a number of health benefits as well as other benefits (sexual stamina being one of them). Circumcision is doing a child a great favour.

We wont let ourselves be intimidated by liberals who want to outlaw everything they dont understand or that is remotely connected to religion.

Face it, you guys who are cut just have no idea and are saying anything just to make it sound like you were given a blessing at birth.

lol

This, in spades.

reply to post by amazed


Okay..... hold on your actually saying that removing foreskin will prevent cancer ? and you got stars ? Please send me a link to where you found this golden gem of information

reply to post by topherman420


Fool. Circumcision dramatically reduces transmission of STDs and reduces penile cancer rates.
Plus, men become better, stronger lovers and can last longer inside the woman compared with those who are uncut. Why do you think the medical community recommends this procedure more and more each year?
Take your weak little turtleneck snail elsewhere.

It should be a decision the male makes, when he is old enough to decide for himself.

reply to post by SonofPeleus


If that's all the case (which I don't accept), why not let adolescent males decide themselves whether they want circumcised ? It's their bodies, after all, surely only they have the right to make that decision ?

Just a thought.

^what he says haha^