It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Aliensun
More and more the anonymous outfit is showing itself to be a terrorists group, domestic or otherwise. Are they really that reckless and self-centered in their activities just because they can...?
.
I wonder how long is it going to be before the feds go after them in a big way and we also get caught in the crossfire such that the use of the internet for free discourse is taken away from us. Is opening a few cans of worms worth the wrath of Big Brother coming down with justifiable reason In their book?
Actually, I foresee the day that IF you say (type or forward) the wrong material out to others, you will receive either a ticket (such as a speeding or minor drug possession) ticket on your screen or a summons to appear will flash at you to come to such and such court at their convenience.
So what drives anonymous anyway, patriotism, sport, egos or the worldwide distruction of what we have today with the internet? Then, looking deeper as with Wikileaks, is there some alterior motives at play such as false flag agendas?
I certainly don't claim to have any knowledge at all about these shennigans, but they seem counter productive in the long run to me.
Originally posted by angelchanneller
My darling Anons, they will merely put to post another Fed chairman. Instead...
Demand the GOLD STANDARD be re-instated.
There is no currency sovereignty truly available today except by backing it with a commodity. If we (Americans) do this...we will no longer kneel to the global markets or to our debtors. Insist that as a part of raising the debt ceiling, money be allotted to put us back on the gold standard.
Open Fort Knox rebels!
If the following link does not scare the begeesus out of you, I do not know what will.
China's Gold Purchases
Originally posted by Aliensun
More and more the anonymous outfit is showing itself to be a terrorists group, domestic or otherwise. Are they really that reckless and self-centered in their activities just because they can...?
.
I wonder how long is it going to be before the feds go after them in a big way and we also get caught in the crossfire such that the use of the internet for free discourse is taken away from us. Is opening a few cans of worms worth the wrath of Big Brother coming down with justifiable reason In their book?
Actually, I foresee the day that IF you say (type or forward) the wrong material out to others, you will receive either a ticket (such as a speeding or minor drug possession) ticket on your screen or a summons to appear will flash at you to come to such and such court at their convenience.
So what drives anonymous anyway, patriotism, sport, egos or the worldwide distruction of what we have today with the internet? Then, looking deeper as with Wikileaks, is there some alterior motives at play such as false flag agendas?
I certainly don't claim to have any knowledge at all about these shennigans, but they seem counter productive in the long run to me.
Originally posted by MrWendal
What kind of group identifies a target and then warns that target that they are in fact, a target?
For example... and this in only an example...
Let us say that I think Boondock-Saint is purposely misleading people and I set out to prove it. Do I first warn Boondock of my intentions? Or instead do I keep my mouth shut, allow Boondock to continue as he always has, compile my evidence, present it, and take him by surprise?
Again this is only an example, Boon thanks for participating
The more I see from Anon the more I am convinced that they are really nothing more than controlled opposition.
Originally posted by Chewingonmushrooms
What difference does it make whether he is at helm or some other goon? I don't understand the point of it really. That's like forcing a president to resign, when you know very well that whoever becomes president afterwards will do exactly the same thing because the underlining problems are still there (corruption, cronyism, and bribery).
Originally posted by FTD Brat
reply to post by grey580
Be careful saying that. Now the FBI is on to you!
Originally posted by randyvs
Originally posted by Chewingonmushrooms
What difference does it make whether he is at helm or some other goon? I don't understand the point of it really. That's like forcing a president to resign, when you know very well that whoever becomes president afterwards will do exactly the same thing because the underlining problems are still there (corruption, cronyism, and bribery).
Agreed, but do you really believe a peaceful demonstration of our will would end up being peaceful ? There must bea catalyst. There must be martyrs and there must be outrage in the streets. Or we welcome it into our homes.
We have every reason that can be imagined, to fear what may happen, if we continue to cower.edit on 14-6-2011 by randyvs because: (no reason given)
FDR said," The only thing we have to fear is fear itself". That was great for it's time.edit on 14-6-2011 by randyvs because: (no reason given)edit on 14-6-2011 by randyvs because: (no reason given)