It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Took pictures of a cigar-like craft 30 minutes ago!

page: 5
20
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 14 2011 @ 10:19 AM
link   
reply to post by Lost_Mind
 


I like your post. But I've done some research about ISS.




This is the picture of object 10 degrees above horizon. Now this is the list of opportunities to see ISS from my city:

SATELLITE LOCAL DURATION MAX ELEV APPROACH DEPARTURE
DATE/TIME (MIN) (DEG) (DEG-DIR) (DEG-DIR)

ISS Sun Jun 12/09:46 PM 1 10 10 above SE 10 above ESE
ISS Sun Jun 12/11:19 PM 6 75 10 above WSW 10 above NE
ISS Mon Jun 13/00:56 AM 4 16 10 above WNW 10 above NNE
ISS Mon Jun 13/02:33 AM < 1 10 10 above NNW 10 above NNW

spaceflight1.nasa.gov...

It doesn't quite include the time I saw the object unfortunately, which was at 9:00pm plus minus 5 minutes. And even if this time was included, it stil wouldn't match the degree at which I observed the craft, which qwas at 75 to 80 degrees above horizon. So what do you think, it looks like the hupothesis of ISS is excluded?



posted on Jun, 14 2011 @ 10:47 AM
link   

Originally posted by Amberry
reply to post by Lost_Mind
 

It doesn't quite include the time I saw the object unfortunately, which was at 9:00pm plus minus 5 minutes. And even if this time was included, it still wouldn't match the degree at which I observed the craft, which qwas at 75 to 80 degrees above horizon. So what do you think, it looks like the hupothesis of ISS is excluded?


Yeah, I looked at the same data and no I don't think it was the ISS at all. Or any other satellite for that matter. Until there is some kind of evidence (not speculation) to point me in another direction, I am probably going to stick with a high altitude aircraft of some type mirroring the setting sun to the ground. Its described behavior is consistent with the behavior of an aircraft, although the reflection lasted a bit longer than I am comfortable with. New evidence could pull me away from that line of thought if it shows something non ballistic or non terrestrial about how it behaved, but it would have to be very compelling evidence.



posted on Jun, 14 2011 @ 10:55 AM
link   
reply to post by Lost_Mind
 





This is the result of search I've done to see for the June 12, 9pm any satelite sighting in Fort Wayne.
edit on 14-6-2011 by Amberry because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 14 2011 @ 11:19 AM
link   
reply to post by Amberry
 


All of those satellites would have had a magnitude way in the positive side of the visible light range and would have been too dim to see with that big ball blowing up the sky with all of that light. Like I said -2.4 to -2.2 is as dim as you are going to be able to see and that's with the sun no more than 10 deg. high and no full moon.



posted on Jun, 14 2011 @ 01:41 PM
link   
reply to post by Amberry
 


Clearly there are two light sources which I attribute to triangle Tesla ships.
So no cigar.
Its quite possible more light can be generated and even become flames of light.
All triangle ship photos:

Taken by one photographer.



posted on Jun, 14 2011 @ 01:46 PM
link   
It looks to me like an aircraft reflecting the sun (which i assume was near or below the horizon?).

Of course, what aircraft it might be is another matter.



posted on Jun, 14 2011 @ 02:12 PM
link   
reply to post by TeslaandLyne
 


LOL, TNL is there anything at all you don't attribute to Tesla technology?? By your standards, my underwear and the bottle of antacids in my medicine cabinet was made by some off the shelf Tesla tech. Your a hoot... and consistent hoot at that... you, my man, are the epitome of devout.

You ought to write a book.



posted on Jun, 15 2011 @ 01:11 PM
link   
reply to post by Lost_Mind
 


The anti Tesla cartels won't publish this stuff, enjoy if you can stand it.
Bill Lyne self publishes and still the distributors lose his books.
I am sure Bill thinks the CIA Cartels and those of interest do bad things like that.
So best keep ideas like that from spreading.
Its a free country letting sociopaths from the anti Tesla cartels run loose so why not
check out the Tesla box, it is full of goodies like gravity and such from electrostatic
pulses, who knew, not Einstein or the rest of his ilk.
Check out electrostatics in biology, there should be suppressed careers in that too.



posted on Jun, 15 2011 @ 03:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by Amberry



This pic almost looks like a space shuttle.
Or a Shuttlecock from a badmitton game !



posted on Jun, 15 2011 @ 10:24 PM
link   
Really cool, good job.

Looks like a nice photo with a lot of resolution, so weird that in the middle of the day with barely a cloud in sight and you catch a rod UFO like it is lighting up.



posted on Jul, 9 2011 @ 11:43 PM
link   
When its cleared up and zoomed in on photo number 3 in the thread it looks like a UFO that was photographed in London like this one here



posted on Jul, 10 2011 @ 05:23 AM
link   
reply to post by Amberry
 


Hey i know what it is...kinda well im pretty sure, have you ever read the Lacerta files? i dont care if sceptics say they are fake. They arnt, anyway the earth reptilians fly cylindrical dark reflective silver tube like ships ( or cigar shaped ships)
anyway its odd that it was flying visible to the city, they usually cloak their hull as an airliner or are not visible at all. maybey they dont worry anymore because they read these threads and laugh at how many doubters there are :p jokes, anyway nice capture



posted on Jul, 10 2011 @ 05:37 AM
link   
There is no way to tell from the photograph what the object is or isn't. There simply isn't enough resolution. You seem genuine though so kudos for not hoaxing.

Nobody with a standard normal camera set up is ever going to get a good photo of a ufo.

You need to be using what the Aircraft Photographers use. Its all about the lens and the lense can cost more than the camera. This is why the increase in camera use worldwide is only producing an explosion in photos of blurred blobs.



posted on Jul, 10 2011 @ 05:40 AM
link   
reply to post by Stayundertheradar
 


It is more likely it has an earthly explanation.
Google: "Andromeda-Gerät".

edit on 10-7-2011 by Regenstorm because: grammar



posted on Jul, 10 2011 @ 09:48 AM
link   


They arnt, anyway the earth reptilians fly cylindrical dark reflective silver tube like ships ( or cigar shaped ships)


Yes, you are right. Because we can of course not accept the most obvious explanation that it was cigar shaped balloon. (Respective two balloons wrapped together in what appears a bigger bag.)

There are what is called "solar balloons" which are silverish/grayish/dark...they are cigar shaped and about 10-15ft long.You put them out in the sun, the sun heats them up and they go up in the sky. I myself once had one of those and let it fly - and in fact it caused a local newspaper to report an "UFO"


But if you think the "earth reptilians" are a more plausible explanation, so be it....lol...



posted on Jul, 10 2011 @ 11:17 AM
link   
reply to post by Amberry
 


I think this might be a plane. Yesterday I saw a plane that I mistakened for a cigar shaped craft. It was so high up and the way it was tilted that I could not see the wings, until it leveled out. But, I will say the craft I witnessed was traveling slightly faster than the top speed of a commercial jet. And it looked liked it was about to crash into an airplane that was passing by. Maybe it was morphing ufo... but when I first noticed the craft it looked exactly like the pictures you posted.



posted on Jul, 10 2011 @ 11:20 AM
link   
lol..looks like a plane to me



posted on Jul, 12 2011 @ 01:31 AM
link   
reply to post by HispanicPanic
 
It's producing to much light to look like a plane. usually Planes dont shine that way when reflecting sunlight unless they are made of aluminum foil or solar panels. but they dont usually have planes made of that stuff. Usually when a U.F.O. shines like that in daylight it's giving off it's energy from the power source or its engines.



posted on Jul, 12 2011 @ 02:32 AM
link   
probably nothing your story doesn't make to much sense either..
You said you ran in to get 2 cameras just in case but you weren't even thinking about taking pictures when you got back because you were so amazed and didn't want to take your eyes off it?
Personally I think its just another case of someone wanting to see one so bad that whatever they see move in the sky and can't explain it believe that its a UFO.



posted on Jul, 25 2011 @ 11:07 AM
link   

Originally posted by paranormal78
When its cleared up and zoomed in on photo number 3 in the thread it looks like a UFO that was photographed in London like this one here


I didn't notice that one.
Perhaps there is concentration at the ends.
For a tubular ship you might see stripes or waves going end to end like rainbows.
The bright light as suggested by the inventor is the action of gases hitting the hull.
So we know there are pressure vibrations going on.




top topics



 
20
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join