It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
* A former National Security Adviser told the Senate that a terrorist act might be carried out in the U.S. and falsely blamed on Iran to justify war against that nation.
* A retired 27-year CIA analyst who prepared and presented Presidential Daily Briefs and served as a high-level analyst for several presidents stated that if there was another major attack in the U.S., it would lead to martial law.
[*Snip to trim external content a little bit*]
* Daniel Ellsberg, the famous Pentagon Papers whistleblower, said "if there is another terror attack, "I believe the president will get what he wants", which will include a dictatorship
* Scott Ritter, the former UN Weapons Inspector (an American) - who stated before the Iraq war started that there were no weapons of mass destruction - is now saying that he would not rule out staged government terror by the U.S. government
* And a member of the British Parliament stated that "there is a very real danger" that the American government will stage a false flag terror attack in order to justify war against Iran and to gain complete control domestically
United Press International reported in June 2005:
U.S. intelligence officers are reporting that some of the insurgents in Iraq are using recent-model Beretta 92 pistols, but the pistols seem to have had their serial numbers erased. The numbers do not appear to have been physically removed; the pistols seem to have come off a production line without any serial numbers. Analysts suggest the lack of serial numbers indicates that the weapons were intended for intelligence operations or terrorist cells with substantial government backing. Analysts speculate that these guns are probably from either Mossad or the CIA. Analysts speculate that agent provocateurs may be using the untraceable weapons even as U.S. authorities use insurgent attacks against civilians as evidence of the illegitimacy of the resistance.
What was the "terrorist" group, Al Qaeda in Iraq, doing with US issued weapons? Could it be that the entire group was armed, trained and funded by the US or covert US operations for so called "US interests"? Was this a US or western manufactured group for the sole purpose of justifying the US war in Iraq with the dissatisfied western public? The group did seem awfully convenient for those in support of the war. Some people might say that those weapons were merely taken from the dead bodies of soldiers, killed in theatre but that explanation doesn't seem to ring true.
The weapons in that video alone, are far too brand new to have been taken off of bodies killed in action and what is the chance that they would have all necessary weapons for a squad or platoon sized element? Would we not also see some "terrorists" armed with Russian made weapons as well? This group seems to be armed with all US and western manufactured weapons
Many people have already realized how phony this "terrorist" group is, but now we have a huge piece of evidence to suggest that this group was at least armed by the US government or US interests.
My theory is that this alleged "terrorist" group was manufactured, funded, trained and armed for the sole purpose of making the Iraqi War relevant to the reasons given by Bush & Co. for being there in the first place. In other words, when the people of the Western world just started to realize that this entire war was for the sole purpose of corporate interests and that we were flat-out lied to, to get us into this war of aggression, up pops a terrorist group where the name alone gives credence to at least two if the reasons cited by the Bush Administration for going to war with Iraq in the first place. It's kind of funny (or would be if it wasn't so tragic) that when this group started to be propagated through the MSM airwaves, opposition to the war went down. What do you think?
--airspoon
Originally posted by redrose123
reply to post by MaxNormal
For the greater of whose good? Protect the world from insane people? How can you get more insane than the people planning this crap? All of this show what a bunch of loones have managed to get in control of the US government. Maybe you think its ok to lie, steal, murder, torture, do terrible experiments on american people for instance the MK Ultra scandal. Or radiate childrens brains the list goes on and on. It might be to your good but it definitely isn't good for the average American people.