It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SpaDe_
Problem easily solved with very little effort on the part of the voter. Get ID! Go to your local municipality and get a copy of your birth certificate, or just simply go down and apply for a state ID. There problem solved and now you can vote like the rest of us.
Geesh how lazy can people be, I mean really. And please don't come back with the argument that some people have no record of their birth.
There are ways to get ID, and if they want to vote or need ID that badly they would do it. In most states now you are required to carry identification with you anyhow, so they would be doing themselves a favor.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
As long as identification cards cost money, a requirement for them to vote technically classifies as a poll tax. Though I'm not opposed to the idea necessarily, I'm uncertain if it would pass legal muster.
Originally posted by Antiquated1
Originally posted by daddyroo45
reply to post by Antiquated1
What is the problem with a photo id ?
They are not free nor handed out because you exist.
Most people I know take their face with them wherever they go. I am not advocating RFID by any means,but a simple photo id,come on. What right is that infringing upon ?
That would be the government forcing everyone to purchase something, wouldn't it?
If you do not have one of the six acceptable forms of photo ID, the State of Georgia offers a FREE Voter Identification Card. An identification card can be issued at any county registrar's office or Department of Driver Services Office free of charge.
Originally posted by mike_trivisonno
reply to post by Antiquated1
An individual's presence at the polling place does not imply of confer citizenship.
And just to be just, citizens accepting federal or state assistance should not be eligible to participate in the election process. Only employed, tax-paying citizens over the age of 25 should be able to vote.
Originally posted by Antiquated1
Originally posted by SpaDe_
Problem easily solved with very little effort on the part of the voter. Get ID! Go to your local municipality and get a copy of your birth certificate, or just simply go down and apply for a state ID. There problem solved and now you can vote like the rest of us.
Both cost money and birth certificates have never had a photo on them.
Geesh how lazy can people be, I mean really. And please don't come back with the argument that some people have no record of their birth.
I never said that. Can you show me a photo ID birth certificate and what state issues such a thing? Do not put words in my posts I did not say to make an argument. That is a huge sign of lacking on the part of your argument.
There are ways to get ID, and if they want to vote or need ID that badly they would do it. In most states now you are required to carry identification with you anyhow, so they would be doing themselves a favor.
Yes, there are many way to get ID but you are not required by law to have have one. They cost money.
Originally posted by macman
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
As long as identification cards cost money, a requirement for them to vote technically classifies as a poll tax. Though I'm not opposed to the idea necessarily, I'm uncertain if it would pass legal muster.
While your response is a great argument point, I think that linking the 2 together is splitting very fine hairs.
Originally posted by macman
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
As long as identification cards cost money, a requirement for them to vote technically classifies as a poll tax. Though I'm not opposed to the idea necessarily, I'm uncertain if it would pass legal muster.
While your response is a great argument point, I think that linking the 2 together is splitting very fine hairs.
Originally posted by mike_trivisonno
reply to post by Antiquated1
An individual's presence at the polling place does not imply of confer citizenship.
I never said it did but I bet when you showed up and found someone had already signed your registration for you, you would notice right quick.
Originally posted by Antiquated1
Originally posted by macman
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
As long as identification cards cost money, a requirement for them to vote technically classifies as a poll tax. Though I'm not opposed to the idea necessarily, I'm uncertain if it would pass legal muster.
While your response is a great argument point, I think that linking the 2 together is splitting very fine hairs.
The only way to unlink the two is to make photo ID free for everyone. Are you ok with that? It will probably mean a tax hike somewhere.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by macman
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
As long as identification cards cost money, a requirement for them to vote technically classifies as a poll tax. Though I'm not opposed to the idea necessarily, I'm uncertain if it would pass legal muster.
While your response is a great argument point, I think that linking the 2 together is splitting very fine hairs.
Perhaps so, but I did hear this argument presented when the debate over this issue came to Georgia. I believe they ultimately issued free ID cards to seniors and others to comply.
Originally posted by Antiquated1
Originally posted by SpaDe_
Problem easily solved with very little effort on the part of the voter. Get ID! Go to your local municipality and get a copy of your birth certificate, or just simply go down and apply for a state ID. There problem solved and now you can vote like the rest of us.
Both cost money and birth certificates have never had a photo on them.
Geesh how lazy can people be, I mean really. And please don't come back with the argument that some people have no record of their birth.
I never said that. Can you show me a photo ID birth certificate and what state issues such a thing? Do not put words in my posts I did not say to make an argument. That is a huge sign of lacking on the part of your argument.
There are ways to get ID, and if they want to vote or need ID that badly they would do it. In most states now you are required to carry identification with you anyhow, so they would be doing themselves a favor.
Yes, there are many way to get ID but you are not required by law to have have one. They cost money.
Originally posted by Antiquated1
Originally posted by macman
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
As long as identification cards cost money, a requirement for them to vote technically classifies as a poll tax. Though I'm not opposed to the idea necessarily, I'm uncertain if it would pass legal muster.
While your response is a great argument point, I think that linking the 2 together is splitting very fine hairs.
The only way to unlink the two is to make photo ID free for everyone. Are you ok with that? It will probably mean a tax hike somewhere.
Real "AMERICAN" citizens have easy access to I.D.'s they simply go to your friendly neighborhood driver's license office, show proof of residency/citizenship/birth certificate, pay your $15 dollars and they take your picture and give you a valid I.D.
Originally posted by Antiquated1
Originally posted by mishigas
I cannot think of a reason why someone would oppose Voter ID, except if they planned on using voter fraud to rig an election.
Because they do not have an ID but still want to exercise their rights as an American citizen?
Seriously? If they can't afford $15 bucks for an I.D. they have bigger issues than voting!
Originally posted by Antiquated1
Originally posted by macman
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
As long as identification cards cost money, a requirement for them to vote technically classifies as a poll tax. Though I'm not opposed to the idea necessarily, I'm uncertain if it would pass legal muster.
While your response is a great argument point, I think that linking the 2 together is splitting very fine hairs.
The only way to unlink the two is to make photo ID free for everyone. Are you ok with that? It will probably mean a tax hike somewhere.