It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A new Rasmussen poll out today found that 75 percent of respondents support a law requiring voters to show ID at the polls. Or, as DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz recently put it, a law that would “drag us all the way back to the Jim Crow” era.
In fairness:
Wasserman Schultz walked back her hyperbole slightly earlier this week, conceding that “Jim Crow was the wrong analogy to use.” But she still claims that requirements to show ID at the polls – which are designed to cut down on election fraud – are racially discriminatory.
Originally posted by mishigas
I cannot think of a reason why someone would oppose Voter ID, except if they planned on using voter fraud to rig an election.
Originally posted by Antiquated1
Originally posted by mishigas
I cannot think of a reason why someone would oppose Voter ID, except if they planned on using voter fraud to rig an election.
Because they do not have an ID but still want to exercise their rights as an American citizen?
Originally posted by daddyroo45
Could you give a good reason why someone that is a citizen of this country,would not have some form of identification ? I mean if they will take the time to vote,why not take the time to get a proper id.
A recent national survey sponsored by the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law reveals that millions of American citizens do not have readily available documentary proof of citizenship. Many more – primarily women – do not have proof of citizenship with their current name. The survey also showed that millions of American citizens do not have government-issued photo identification, such as a driver’s license or passport. Finally, the survey demonstrated that certain groups – primarily poor, elderly, and minority citizens – are less likely to possess these forms of documentation than the general population.
As many as 11 percent of United States citizens – more than 21 million individuals – do not have government-issued photo identification.
Elderly citizens are less likely to possess government-issued photo identification.
Minority citizens are less likely to possess government-issued photo identification.
Citizens with comparatively low incomes are less likely to possess photo identification.
Originally posted by mishigas
But she still claims that requirements to show ID at the polls – which are designed to cut down on election fraud – are racially discriminatory.
Originally posted by Antiquated1
Originally posted by daddyroo45
Could you give a good reason why someone that is a citizen of this country,would not have some form of identification ? I mean if they will take the time to vote,why not take the time to get a proper id.
Can you explain to me why someone that is a citizen of this country would have a photo ID? This is about photo ID. Not a SS card or birth certificate. PHOTO ID. Why would a citizen have a photo ID?
A recent national survey sponsored by the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law reveals that millions of American citizens do not have readily available documentary proof of citizenship. Many more – primarily women – do not have proof of citizenship with their current name. The survey also showed that millions of American citizens do not have government-issued photo identification, such as a driver’s license or passport. Finally, the survey demonstrated that certain groups – primarily poor, elderly, and minority citizens – are less likely to possess these forms of documentation than the general population.
As many as 11 percent of United States citizens – more than 21 million individuals – do not have government-issued photo identification.
Elderly citizens are less likely to possess government-issued photo identification.
Minority citizens are less likely to possess government-issued photo identification.
Citizens with comparatively low incomes are less likely to possess photo identification.
Read moreedit on 10-6-2011 by Antiquated1 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by daddyroo45
reply to post by Antiquated1
What is the problem with a photo id ?
Most people I know take their face with them wherever they go. I am not advocating RFID by any means,but a simple photo id,come on. What right is that infringing upon ?
Originally posted by mishigas
reply to post by Antiquated1
All those figures you presented mean very little.
Those people probably don't vote to begin with.
But this is a wonderful opportunity for them to get something they never had - a picture ID.
Originally posted by macman
reply to post by Antiquated1
So you provide a survey as a counter point?
Ok. Anything else?