It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Alien Building On Dark Side Of Moon Discovered

page: 3
80
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 8 2011 @ 09:41 AM
link   
The pics are clearly photoshopped. There is the big picture of the moon on the right side, and on the left you have layers of dark gray copy pasted on top of each other, you have white dots and you have paint brush. End of thread.



posted on Jun, 8 2011 @ 11:17 AM
link   
If you have the time there are some amazing finds to make. Arizona state university has the luna orbita scans (pre air brushed) if you have a good picture viewer and zoom in there is stuff all over the place.
Happy hunting.
ser.sese.asu.edu...



posted on Jun, 8 2011 @ 11:23 AM
link   

Originally posted by Jonas86
The pics are clearly photoshopped. There is the big picture of the moon on the right side, and on the left you have layers of dark gray copy pasted on top of each other, you have white dots and you have paint brush. End of thread.


^^^Exactly. Here a pic i took from the website. Adjusted the lighting curves and this is what I get:
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/3831b986f85c.jpg[/atsimg]
Sloppy sloppy sloppy!!! Bad Photo editing on the hoaxers part. This is obviously photoshopped.
edit on 6/8/2011 by CastleMadeOfSand because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 8 2011 @ 11:29 AM
link   
What would the shadows be?



posted on Jun, 8 2011 @ 11:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by CastleMadeOfSand

Originally posted by Jonas86
The pics are clearly photoshopped. There is the big picture of the moon on the right side, and on the left you have layers of dark gray copy pasted on top of each other, you have white dots and you have paint brush. End of thread.


^^^Exactly. Here a pic i took from the website. Adjusted the lighting curves and this is what I get:
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/3831b986f85c.jpg[/atsimg]
Sloppy sloppy sloppy!!! Bad Photo editing on the hoaxers part. This is obviously photoshopped.
edit on 6/8/2011 by CastleMadeOfSand because: (no reason given)


Ya we already know that. That was discussed on page 1.

Don't know but chances are it is nothing of relevance.



posted on Jun, 8 2011 @ 12:08 PM
link   
reply to post by pacofunk64
 


Yeah, of course it was discussed, but not shown.

So photoshop brushes visible in the pics are not of relevance? Care to explain that comment?

So if an image shows signs of manipulation, we should disregard the manipulations and continue the speculation?

edit on 6/8/2011 by CastleMadeOfSand because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 8 2011 @ 12:09 PM
link   


















posted on Jun, 8 2011 @ 12:12 PM
link   
reply to post by amaster
 


And your point is ?
Just posting six links to pictures with no comment is pretty pointless.



posted on Jun, 8 2011 @ 12:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by gortex
reply to post by amaster
 


And your point is ?
Just posting six links to pictures with no comment is pretty pointless.

If you looked at the pictures he posted it clearly shows the flaws in the pictures. The "white dots" go off the moon and into space. These pictures are nothing more than flawed. Sorry, no alien buildings on the moon.



posted on Jun, 8 2011 @ 12:32 PM
link   
reply to post by jaydeePNW
 


I did look at them , and it has already been shown by people who could be bothered to make a comment



posted on Jun, 8 2011 @ 12:39 PM
link   
That abandoned MacDonald's was at a Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) facility, the one at Mountain View CA, as I recall. When MacDonald's left, they used the space to store the old reels of film. Ross



posted on Jun, 8 2011 @ 12:46 PM
link   
reply to post by gortex
 


Sorry, I forgot to add my comments before hitting the reply button. I was just showing some similar photos with similar distortions from what seems to be the same batch of photos used in the OP. There really wasn't a point, just some interesting pictures.

Sorry again.



posted on Jun, 8 2011 @ 12:49 PM
link   
reply to post by sir_slide
 


The fact that the original article doesn't link to the source, tells you they likely originated from there and are therefore a hoax.



posted on Jun, 8 2011 @ 01:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by gortex
reply to post by jaydeePNW
 


I did look at them , and it has already been shown by people who could be bothered to make a comment

My bad, I missed the 2nd page. Must have hit the >> thing...



posted on Jun, 8 2011 @ 01:34 PM
link   
reply to post by sir_slide
 


i'm sorry but they look very fake to me, anyone with the latest photoshop could make those pictures. just saying.



posted on Jun, 8 2011 @ 01:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by jaydeePNW

Originally posted by gortex
reply to post by amaster
 


And your point is ?
Just posting six links to pictures with no comment is pretty pointless.

If you looked at the pictures he posted it clearly shows the flaws in the pictures. The "white dots" go off the moon and into space. These pictures are nothing more than flawed. Sorry, no alien buildings on the moon.


but these dots dont have a shadow



posted on Jun, 8 2011 @ 01:39 PM
link   
The Lunar Orbiters used film cameras. The film was automatically processed on board the spacecraft. The film was automatically scanned. The scan (analog) was transmitted to Earth, pretty much a TV image of the film.

The flaws are the result of the film processing.



posted on Jun, 8 2011 @ 01:47 PM
link   
My mistake! The facility in Mountain View CA is Ames Research Center, not JPL. Otherwise, I believe the details about the Lunar Orbiter photo storage, and the abandoned MacDonald's is correct. Ross
edit on 8-6-2011 by Ross 54 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 8 2011 @ 02:02 PM
link   
There's a lot of brush work done there. I'd assume to either cover something up or hoax this. Wonder if they placed the round parts, shadows can be manipulated in PS as well, but with the brushed parts being so obviously PS I don't think the round parts were put in.



posted on Jun, 8 2011 @ 02:06 PM
link   
Time to toss this topic into the [HOAX] bin...



new topics

top topics



 
80
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join