The oldest Metropolis on Earth was built by the Anunnaki! PROOF!

reply to post by Painterz


This sounds most logical, is there anywhere I can find documentation of those studies?

I heard someone talking about these ruins a while ago. Think it was on Ted.com, but i´m not sure, cant seem to find it. What I remember was that many of those structures were built like fractals. Anyone seen that talk?

Originally posted by EvolEric
"Golf"

Guess we didnt read the same article... cos I clearly read "Gulf"
So did CTRL+F (search)
No "Golf" was even in the source

Actually, the article read Persian "Golf" yesterday when I originally read it as well. It was edited sometime between then and now to reflect the proper word.

(I would imagine the extra traffic was cause for extra attention to the article.)

This is pretty much as close to proof as we have gotten today of course it's not "absolute" but if you think about it, it all points to one thing.
Source

This talks about the landing of the annunaki, why they came, and they flood that is talked about in every ancient civilization at least that I know of.

Working from the same archaeological discoveries, artifacts, and recovered records as archaeologists and linguists have for two hundred years, Sitchin propounds – proves, in the opinion of this author -- that the Anunnaki (Sumerian: “those who came down from the heavens”; Old testament Hebrew, Anakeim, Nefilim, Elohim; Egyptian: Neter), an advanced civilization from the tenth planet in our solar system, splashed down in the Persian gulf area around 432,000 years ago, colonized the planet, with the purpose of obtaining large quantities of gold. Some 250,000 years ago, the recovered documents tell us, their lower echelon miners rebelled against the conditions in the mines and the Anunnaki directorate decided to create a creature to take their place. Enki, their chief scientist and Ninhursag their chief medical officer, after getting no satisfactory results splicing animal and Homo Erectus genes, merged their Anunnaki genes with that of Homo Erectus and produced us, Homo Sapiens, a genetically bicameral species, for their purposes as slaves. Because we were a hybrid, we could not procreate. The demand for us as workers became greater and we were genetically manipulated to reproduce.

Eventually, we became so numerous that some of us were expelled from the Anunnaki city centers, gradually spreading over the planet. Having become a stable genetic stock and developing more precociously than, perhaps, the Anunnaki had anticipated, the Anunnaki began to be attracted to humans as sexual partners and children were born of these unions. This was unacceptable to the majority of the Anunnaki high council and it was decided to wipe out the human population through a flood that was predictable when Nibiru, the tenth in our solar system and the Anunnaki home planet, came through the inner solar system again (around 12,500 years ago) on one of its periodic 3600 year returns. Some humans were saved by the action of the Anunnaki official, Enki, who was sympathetic to the humans he had originally genetically created. For thousands of years, we were their slaves, their workers, their servants, and their soldiers in their political battles among themselves. The Anunnaki used us in the construction of their palaces (we retroproject the religious notion of temple on these now), their cities, their mining and refining complexes and their astronomical installations on all the continents. They expanded from Mesopotamia to Egypt to India to South and Central America and the stamp of their presence can be found in the farthest reaches of the planet.

Around 6000 years ago, they, probably realizing that they were going to phase off the planet, began, gradually, to bring humans to independence. Sumer, a human civilization, amazing in its “sudden”, mature, and highly advanced character was set up under their tutelage in Mesopotamia. Human kings were inaugurated as go-betweens, foremen of the human populations answering to the Anunnaki. A strain of humans, genetically enhanced with more Anunnaki genes, a bloodline of rulers in a tradition of “servants of the people” was initiated (Gardner). These designated humans were taught technology, mathematics, astronomy, advanced crafts and the ways of advanced civilized society (in schools, called now “mystery schools” but there was no mystery about them). Gardner has brought to light the fact that there exists a robust, highly documented, genealogical, genetic history carrying all the way back to the Anunnaki, possessed by the heterodox tradition of Christianity, which is only now coming forward, no longer gun-shy of the Inquisition. This tradition, preserving the bloodline, is the one branded “heretical” and murderously persecuted by the Roman Church. There were no Dark Ages for this tradition, only for those whom the Church wanted to keep in the dark about the real nature of human history and destroy the bloodline, a direct threat to the power of the Bishops.

This further supports that they were here for gold.

The recovered records place the location of the Anunnaki laboratory where the first humans were literally produced in east central Africa just above their gold mines. This falls precisely on the map where the mitochondrial DNA “search for Eve” places the first woman Homo Sapiens and in the same period. (The gold mining engineers of Africa have found 100,000-year-old gold mines in that area.) The evidence for, and description of advanced genetic engineering is all there in the ancient documents. Our rapid progress from inception to going to Mars soon, after only 250,000 years, does not correspond to the million year periodicities of slow evolutionary development of other species such as Homo Erectus before us. As so many thinkers have pointed out, we are radically and anomalously different, as discussed in part three.

This proves they had technology more advanced than ours.

Ooparts is the term used to describe the purportedly out of place in time artifacts, toys, tools, technical devices, depictions and documents which have come to light through archaeological excavation or discovery. Almost everyone is familiar, through published works or documentaries, with the clay pot batteries still containing the electrodes from the Iraqi desert dated at 2500 B.C., the flyable model airplane from a pyramid tomb, the sophisticated machining of stone requiring the most advanced techniques we know today, the 1000 ton precision cut blocks of stone in a temple foundation that we could not even handle, an ancient relief frieze from an Abydos temple depicting rockets, airplanes and even a helicopter, etc. The most recent and quite amazing oopart is the rediscovery of monoatomic gold by David Hudson (Monoatomics are superconductors at room temperature, have anti-gravitic properties and are only now being investigated by the advanced physics community) Hudson’s discovery, correlated with the bringing to light, by Gardner, of the suppressed discovery of the Anunnaki gold processing plant on Mt. Horeb by Sir Flinders Petrie in 1889 demonstrates that the monoatomics were already known at least 3000 years ago. These ooparts coupled with evidence from many disciplines and the historical records indicate that an advanced civilization existed in those times possessing a high technology and that that civilization was indeed the Anunnaki.

Theres even more info at the source

reply to post by gekados


You had me until I read that it must of been the Annunaki without regarding facts. Seems these images are used to prop up some kind of fairy tale that has no factual basis. Why do people take large leaps like this with such astounding finds?

You only serve to prove that you have an agenda and are pushing it, rendering this entire topic useless.

reply to post by mb2591


That source is like reading little red riding hood. It's a story someone wrote with little facts to support the theory.
The title of this topic says PROOF!, but i see not a shred of it and all these source articles fail miserably at the same thing, providing facts thats is proof this theory is truth.

I don't see no truth or a proof. The real truth about our history or our ancestors will be never published...

Originally posted by gekados
Things get even more interesting after combining them with the Sumerian tablets.

(...)

My final conclusion is that Sitchin's translations are accurate enough to consider them genuine.

I have no idea how you came to that conclusion. As I lack the tools to read the stuff myself I have to do with what others who claim to have that expertise tell us:

Exposing Sitchin, part 1: Elohim in the Hebrew Bible

or

SITCHIN IS WRONG.COM

Michael Tellinger is an expert on Adam's Calendar/Enki's Laboratory. The structure is over 75,000 Years old and was indeed built by the Anunnaki, ENKI.


www.youtube.com...

Originally posted by Hachi85
reply to post by Painterz

 

This sounds most logical, is there anywhere I can find documentation of those studies?

I heard someone talking about these ruins a while ago. Think it was on Ted.com, but i´m not sure, cant seem to find it. What I remember was that many of those structures were built like fractals. Anyone seen that talk?

I'm not sure if much has been published yet about them, I'd have to check. I think there may have been some of the dating evidence published in the Proceedings Of The Prehistoric Society, but as I say, not 100% sure. (And I don't have access to a university library from here to check.)

There was a BBC documentary about these particular structures that aired a year or so ago... but again, I forget the name. It was part of the Horizon series I think.

A lot of archaeological papers don't make it onto the internet, so it can be very difficult sometimes to provide web friendly links. The thing is there is just so much archaeology in Africa, and a lot of it is very early, and very exciting, that it could keep generations of archaeologists busy for a thousand years.

It's evidence of a pretty extensive and well developed neolithic society, and on the ground I suppose it can look to laymen like something beyond imagining, but really, the sites are fully archived and have a solid chronology backed up by C14 dating and other dating methodologies. There is no mystery in them, beyond, what a clever group of early farmers these were, and what magnificent things they achieved.

Originally posted by TankWolf
reply to post by Painterz

 

Thanks for your post makes more sense, have you ever heard of this stone calendar mentioned in the article?

The Stone Calender is news to me. I've never heard of it before.

There are however some very sophisticated stone calender systems in Africa. When the Neolithic dawned, and early humans started to become farmers, it became important for them to make big calender systems so they knew what time of year they had to start what crops, and suchlike.

So there are a lot of them. I've never heard of one being dated back as far into prehistory as the OP suggests though, such methodology as described in the article is... questionable to me.

Originally posted by Dannijca
reply to post by NeverSleepingEyes

 

So can you tell what could be for you a proof in this case? only a example

no

I'll repeat it one more time, hoping to get it across this time:
I didn't claim anything
I don't have to proof

it's a simple as this so stop that discursive trick used by those who can't stand others calling their reasoning anything but proof.

It bores me

However, as I aim to please, here's a link for you (mind you, it's wikipedia):
en.wikipedia.org...(truth)

please note that none of my replies actually dismissed any of the statements in the OP, other than it is "PROOF".
Please also note my suggestion to replace "proof" with "possibility". but this might be too boring for all these imaginative brains that marvel in finding patterns and come to the wrong conclusions (I'm a scientist, I do this all the time: being wrong about reality.)

Thanks for the pics OP
Nice rock circles. Where are the alien mines. Where is there any evidence, little tiny evidence, anything please.
Annunaki, left us with nothing. Those greedy Annunaki they took all of our gold...We need it to reasure the dollar
Anyway I love these stories but to proclaim evidence of aliens with such inperfect rock circles is making Sxxt up.
It was a good story.. Thanks OP

reply to post by gekados


Interesting read. My file cabinet has just been filled with more documentaion

reply to post by gekados


i love the stories BUT

u have no evidence at all...

walls made of small stones, wide 1 meter only??

wtf are you talking, its no eveidence

i dont know where that came from.. but stories about gold mining for atmosphere on other planet and connecting everything to fill your theory is a BS

its not how science works.

I have seen this article constructively debunked from several angles, but one that has not been mentioned that jumped out to me was when the article was talking about all of the ancient roads.

This is not a "special" location -- just one we picked at random, within the previously described area. It shows artifacts that are everywhere and we encourage you to search the area with this great internet technology.

The circular stone structures are obvious from this view, even though they may not be visible from ground level. Notice that there are many very long roads [B] that connect groups of the circular structures. If you zoom out and follow these "roads" they travel for many miles.

Why in the world would a group of people that can zip across the universe in space ships need primitive stone roads to move from point A to point B? It would be much more practical to extract the gold and zip it off to space.

Then again, talking about giant aliens harvesting gold from our planet 400,000 years ago is not too practical in the first place.

Originally posted by EspyderMan
reply to post by mb2591

 

That source is like reading little red riding hood. It's a story someone wrote with little facts to support the theory.
The title of this topic says PROOF!, but i see not a shred of it and all these source articles fail miserably at the same thing, providing facts thats is proof this theory is truth.

Great post!

Why don't you try disproving some of what is written than just saying what you think it is. What makes you all knowing and better than everyone else. You probably didn't even bother to read my entire post yet you discredit the entire thing.

what in the earth shows on that pictures, that those stone walls were built by aliens?

chinese wall build by aliens too? its much greater object..


su dude, dont spread BS, ppl are stupid enough allready

reply to post by SneakySleuth911


Don't forget the Annunnaki were so advanced they used stone axes and antler picks to dig for gold and needed to visibly line up the Giza pyramids with Mt Ararat in order to find where their space port was. Cos they hadn't invented mechanical drills or discovered the compass.

(well, according to Mr Sitchin's novels, anyway )

I don't know if this is proof that the Annunaki built it, but it sure as hell proves that someone did, but who?

For all of those people saying ETs would have built something better...well, you have a point. But, what is better? A smart race won't built something that "looks" good, they'll build something that is good, something that's practical.

If I were an alien coming to a strange land to do labour, I won't spend much time and resources building some fancy looking place. Think about it, if you want fancy...you go back to the ship and relax. We're not staying here forever, we just mining some rocks. The peons will have to make do with a temporary structure...and when you're in the need to lounge, head back to the ship and kick your feet up. Your planet is dying...what time do you have to build elaborate, nicely furnished palaces...for peons to slave in? Besides, this won't take very long. We don't plan on living on this planet...we're just passing through. Maybe, if we planned on staying here, we'd build it to resemble what we have at home...but we're not staying here...we're going back home afterward. So...
By some of you people's logic, building anything more than what they supposedly built would actually be a very stupid idea.

And lastly, if these things are indeed 400, 000 to 200,000 years old, I'm sure we're probably looking at a fraction of what it once was.

Common sense people, it doesn't hurt to try it sometimes. Smh

reply to post by sdrawkcabII


I would add that if it still stands after that many years, the backward architectural capacities of the "Annunaki" isn't so bad... How many thinks the Empire State Building will still be standing in 400 000 years?